Tuesday, February 18, 2025

The Rig Veda's Tenth Sukta: Shiva, Hari, Garuda, Kamadeva & the Holy Relationship



We now come to the Rig Veda's tenth Sukta, which felt like a milestone -- until I remembered how many more lay ahead. Yikes. Will I finish the job before I drop my body? Will I even get through the first Mandala? Only time will tell -- and best to leave the future in God's hands, I daresay.

Historically, this Sukta has been characterized as a song of praise addressed to King Indra, who we now know to be the Red Ray or Blood Ray -- the Logos or Word of God, more or less, whose "sparks" are our individual Souls (Adam or Atman). Like the nine Riks previously translated and interpreted, Rv 1.10 is a wisdom teaching rather than a hymn or poem. Poetic in its use of language in places, to be sure, but narrative in structure rather than metered. King Indra is indeed discussed throughout, but mentioned as well are Vishnu, Shiva, Krishna (possibly), Brahma, Kamadeva, the Vasu, and Anu (among others). The main subject is, however, the Om/Aum vibration and the critical role it plays in the illusion-destroying and reality-restoring processes leading to Moksha.

So, let's get to it without further ado. Consistent with Max Muller's formatting, the Rik's first verse reads as follows in transliterated Sanskrit: gayanti tva gayatrino 'rcanty arkam arkinah brahmanas tva satakrata ud vamsam iva yemire.

My translation:

The sacred-syllable drives the Self to acquire the stillness of God-incarnate, the ray of light illuminating the higher thoughts of the Self, the true thoughts of God up above the descendants seemingly in the waters of sin.

My syllable breaks and definitions:

gā-yanti (the sacred-syllable drives) tvā (the Self) gāya-triṇo (to acquire the stillness) '(a)rcanty (of God-incarnate) arkam (the ray of light) arkiṇaḥ (illuminating) brah-māṇas (the higher thoughts) tvā (of the Self) śatakrata (the True Thought of God that is Indra, the Logos) ud (up above) vaṃśam (the descendants or lineage) iva (seemingly in)
The next line (Rv 1.10.2) reads: yat sanoh sanum aruhad bhury aspasta kartvam tad indro artham cetati vuthena vrsnir ejati.

My translation:

Strive to rise level by level astride the Mighty Horse stabilizing the Great Purusha's cycles of the universe, which drive the selfless purpose of the mind to connect the sparks of the rays born of Vishnu, the Holy One.
My divisions and definitions:

yat ( strive or endeavor) sānoḥ (to rise) sānum (level by level) āruhad (astride) bhūry (the mighty) aspa-ṣṭa (horse stabilizing) ka-rtvam (the Great Purusha's cycles) tad (of the universe) in-dro (driving the selfless) arthaṃ (purpose) cetati (of the mind) yū-thena (to connect the sparks) vṛṣṇir (of the rays) e-jati (born of Vishnu, the Holy One)

My notes:

The Sanskrit word "aspa" or "asva" means "horse," rather than "horses," so the rishis probably don't mean the four horses seen by the Biblical prophets. The horse referenced is almost certainly Uchaihshravas, the seven-headed flying equine that emerged from the churning of the Ocean of Milk. According to the lore, King Indra seized the horse as it rose and claimed it as his vehicle.
Wikipedia and other sources tell us the name Uchaihshravas means "long ears" or "neighing aloud," neither of which reveals anything about what the horse represents allegorically. Not sure how they came up with those definitions, because the name is, in actuality, a three-way compound of "uch" (to end), "chaih" (dividing) and "shravas" (the glory of the All). So, Uchaihshravas represents the Atonement (in principle), which King Indra, the Logos, claimed as his "vehicle" after the Holy Spirit changed the purpose of the dream. And that change of purpose, which took place in and remains encapsulated in the Holy Instant, is what the Samudra Manthana fable is really about.
Uchchaihshravas, as depicted in Hindu iconography. Do his ears look long to you?

When the Holy Spirit changed the world's purpose (from insane and chaotic miscreating in conflict to restoring divine order, sanity, and peace), he allowed us to choose between the two worlds (for a time), to preserve our God-given free-will. And, as Course-Jesus explains:

It is still up to you to choose to join with truth or with illusion. But remember that to choose one is to let the other go. Which one you choose you will endow with beauty and reality, because the choice depends on which you value more. The spark of beauty or the veil of ugliness, the real world or the world of guilt and fear, truth or illusion, freedom or slavery—it is all the same. For you can never choose except between God and the ego. Thought systems are but true or false, and all their attributes come simply from what they are. Only the Thoughts of God are true. And all that follows from them comes from what they are, and is as true as is the holy Source from which they came.

My holy brother, I would enter into all your relationships, and step between you and your fantasies. Let my relationship to you be real to you, and let me bring reality to your perception of your brothers. They were not created to enable you to hurt yourself through them. They were created to create with you. This is the truth that I would interpose between you and your goal of madness. Be not separate from me, and let not the holy purpose of Atonement be lost to you in dreams of vengeance. Relationships in which such dreams are cherished have excluded me. Let me enter in the Name of God and bring you peace, that you may offer peace to me.

(ACIM, T-17.III.9:1–10:8)

And just so we're on the same page, the Holy Relationship Jesus discusses above and at length in the Course is indeed "the selfless purpose of the mind to connect the sparks of the rays born of Vishnu, the Holy One." So, once again, the Rig Veda and the Course are simpatico, which is as it should be, since both were, of course, divinely revealed by the same Source. And the Holy Spirit's teachings are always consistent in content, even if they differ in form.

If it helps cement the concept, think of the Holy Relationship as a pearl necklace. Our Souls are the pearls, Vishnu is the string running through the pearls to hold them together, and Shiva is the box protecting the necklace.

Let's move on to the Rik's third line, which describes the Holy Relationship in more detail. In transliterated Sanskrit, the line should read: yuksva hi kesina hari vrsana kaksyapra athana Indra somapa giram upasrutim cara. Not how Max Muller structured the line, but the only way it both makes sense and communicates Higher Truth.

My translation:

Join as Souls to stimulate the Lion of God, Hari, the power of grace encircling and advancing the reach of King Indra's Living Water, the voice from above heard to obtain knowledge of God.

My divisions and definitions:

yukṣvā (join as Souls) hi (to stimulate) keśin-ā (the Lion of God), harī (Hari) vṛṣ-aṇā (the power of grace) kakṣya-prā (encircling and advancing) athānah (the reach of) Indra (Indra's) som-apā (life water or living water) girām (the voice from) upa-śrutiṃ (above heard ) car-a (to obtain knowledge of God)

My notes:

Herein we learn that "Hari" is the Lion of God, as well as the power of grace extending the reach of the Living Water generated by King Indra, the Word of God. Technically, the Sanskrit word "kesin" means "long hair," but the word also is used to describe lions and horses, because of their manes.

I went with "lion" instead of "long hair" or "horse" for several reasons. The first is that God's strength, power, and authority are compared to a lion's roar or growl -- metaphors for the Om vibration -- several places in the Bible. The second is that Ezekiel saw a lion on the right-hand or eastern side of the circle in his vision of the four Living Beings. The third is that, in the Kabbalah, the archangel Uriel is described as the Lion of God, and Uriel -- the archangel of the Atonement -- is (as discussed many posts ago) the black-ram "vahana" or "vehicle" of Agni, the Fire of God. Uriel is, in fact, both the gentle Lamb of God and the powerful Lion of God, which "lie down together" to bring about our deliverance.

Or, to quote Course-Jesus:

The lion and the lamb lying down together symbolize that strength and innocence are not in conflict, but naturally live in peace. “Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God” is another way of saying the same thing. A pure mind knows the truth and this is its strength. It does not confuse destruction with innocence because it associates innocence with strength, not with weakness. (ACIM, T-3.I.5:3-6)

In Hinduism, "Hari" is primarily used to describe Lord Vishnu, the Vishwapurusha aspect of the Holy Spirit of Grace. The word means "one who takes away (sin)" or "the remover of obstacles (to enlightenment)," making Lord Vishnu the deific figure in Hinduism equivalent to Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God.

On the subject of the symbolic Lamb, Course-Jesus says:

I have been correctly referred to as “the lamb of God who taketh away the sins of the world,” but those who represent the lamb as blood-stained do not understand the meaning of the symbol. Correctly understood, it is a very simple symbol that speaks of my innocence. (ACIM, T-3.I.5:1-2)

Like I said several posts back, Jesus and Vishnu both represent the Vishwapurusha "aspect" of the Christ Mind striving to awaken its dreaming parts. In the Biblical Book of Revelations, Jesus also is called "the Lion of Judah," meaning that, like Vishnu, he represents the power of Hari on the right-hand or eastern side of the Wheel of the circle-journey. Ergo, Jesus and Vishnu both symbolize the Lion and the Lamb -- God's strength and innocence working in tandem to wake us up. 
As most non-Hindus are aware (thanks to the Hare Krishna movement), the term "Hari" (in its "vocative form" of "Hare") is used to address and/or invoke Lord Vishnu's seventh and eighth "avatars" or "incarnations" (Rama and Krishna, respectively). Both are praised repeatedly in what is known as the Maha or Great Mantra. Chanting the mantra is said to destroy the inauspiciousness of the Kali age, help control the mind, and reveal spiritual reality.

The sixteen-word Vaishnava mantra first appeared in the Kali-Santarana Upanishad, which was scribed sometime prior to 1500 CE. In the 15th century, it rose to importance in the Bhakti movement founded by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. Wikipedia tells us the mantra is composed of three Sanskrit names: Krishna, Rama, and Hare. But Hare isn't technically a name; it's (as I said) the "vocative" form of Hari; meaning it's how the personified forms of Hari are addressed or invoked. If, for example, Hari meant "lord," Hare would be akin to "your lordship." (That's how I see it, anyway.)

But wait, there's more ... because Lord Vishnu's fourth avatar is Narasimha -- the "man-lion" who killed Hiranyakashipu, ending religious persecution and calamity on earth and restoring Dharma. What Narasimha represents is pretty obvious when we apprehend that 1) Hiranyakashipu means "the desire for material wealth and comforts" and 2) "Nara" refers to the Purusha -- the Nataraja aspect of Shiva "dancing" underneath the illusion to move God's Plan forward. So "Narasimha" more accurately and meaningfully translates as the Atonement Lion or the Lion of those seeking Atonement through Christ (the meaning of "Judah" in scriptural code) than as "man-lion."

As I read the symbols, Narasimha represents the strength of God, which gradually restores the Soul's spiritual sight. And that strength takes the form of the Om vibration, which we begin to hear very faintly in the first quadrant of the circle-journey -- the quadrant of Dharma. Hearing the sound, which dissolves the desire for material wealth and comforts -- the valueless things of the world, in Course terms -- purifies us enough to cross the threshold into the second quadrant of "Artha." Since my post on the circle-journey, I've learned that "Artha" means "purpose" rather than "wealth," which makes a whole lot more sense. Why? Because the second quadrant is where we begin to fulfill our holy purpose in the Circle of Forgiveness, by giving and receiving the Living Water that washes away the perceptions of sin and its ensuing guilt and karmic debts.

Here we see Narashima-Lakshmi, one of five personas Vishnu's fourth avatar assumes in Hindu iconography. As Narashima-Lakshmi, he isn't a form of Lakshmi, he's her partner (in her green-clad Bhumi "aspect") in the first quadrant of the circle-journey. 

Let's proceed to the next verse (Rv 1.10.4), which reads: ehi stomam abhi svarabhi grnihy a ruva brahma cano vaso sacendra yajnam ca vardhaya uktham indraya samsyam vardhanam purunisidhe sakro. (At this point, Max Muller's "chanda-chariot" loses its wheels, so to speak, because his imposed line-breaks no longer hold sway.)

My translation:

Lord Vishnu stimulates the chorus praising the Red Ray, the Highest Self sending forth the Light of God to obstruct Brahma (the Ego Mind) to enable dwelling together in the Majesty bestowing the knowledge connecting the divided quarters mentioned (in previous Suktas); Indra's four parts to be completed by choosing the wealth of Heaven unhindering the fullness of the Rays.

My divisions and definitions:

stomām̐ (the chorus praising) abhi (the Red Ray) svarāb-hi (the highest self sending forth) gṛṇīhy = grinihi (the light) ā (of God) ruva = ruya (to obstruct) brahma (the Ego Mind, "the creator" of material unreality) cano (to enable) vaso (dwelling) sac-endra (together in the Majesty) ya-jñaṃ (bestowing the knowledge) ca (connecting) vardh-aya (the divided quarters) uktham (mentioned previously) indrāya (Indra's four) śaṃsyaṃ (parts to be completed) var-dhanam (by choosing the wealth of) puru-niṣidhe (Heaven unhindering) śak(a)ro (the fullness of the rays)

My notes:

"Ehi," the word starting this verse, is widely believed to mean "come" or "come near" -- in the sense of a command or entreaty. That may be so in some cases, but those definitions don't work here. Dividing the word as "e" and "hi," on the other hand, not only works, but also affirms many things just explained about Vishnu and Hari. In case I failed to say this earlier, the stand-alone letter "E" designates Vishnu, the Holy One or Holy Spirit, in Vedic shorthand.

What's particularly noteworthy here is that the rishis use the name Brahma for the Ego Mind. I can't be wrong about this, given the context. I mean, what else could the Light of God "obstruct" to enable us to dwell together in the Majesty the Ego Mind hides from our awareness?

In the Course, Jesus never mentions the four Living Beings. He does, however, use the specific term "Majesty" in a similar capacity at least eight times. In one place, he says:

When a mind has only light, it knows only light. Its own radiance shines all around it, and extends out into the darkness of other minds, transforming them into Majesty. The Majesty of God is there, for you to recognize and appreciate and know. Recognizing the Majesty of God in your brother is to accept your own inheritance. God gives only equally. If you recognize His gift in anyone, you have acknowledged what He has given you. Nothing is so easy to recognize as truth. This is the recognition that is immediate, clear and natural. You have trained yourself not to recognize it, and this has been very difficult for you. (ACIM, T-7.XI.5:1-9)

Course-Jesus may not mention the Living Beings, but in another section of the Text, he uses words almost identical to those found in this verse. To demonstrate what I mean, I've underlined the relevant phrasing in the citation below:

This tiny spot of sin that stands between you and your brother still is holding back the happy opening of Heaven’s gate. How little is the hindrance that withholds the wealth of Heaven from you. And how great will be the joy in Heaven when you join the mighty chorus to the Love of God! (ACIM, T-26.IV.6:1-3)

The Sukta's next verse also deviates radically from Max Muller's inflicted metric structure. To make sense and communicate truth, Rv 1.10.5 should read: yatha sutesu no raranat sakhyesu ca tam it imahe tam raye tam suvirye sa sakra uta nah sakat indro vasu dayamanah.

My translation:

In accord with the charioteer of Holy Vishnu streaming the radiant sound, the Holy Relationship connects the Soul-selves in brotherhood to ask the One Self streaming in four parts -- the holy and heroic Word of God, the Mighty One protecting the whole wheeled vehicle driving the selfless Vasu -- to grant Yama wholeness.

My divisions and definitions:

yathā (in accordance with) sut-eṣu (the charioteer of "esu" = Holy Vishnu) ṇo (streaming) rā-raṇat (the radiant sound) sakhye-ṣu (the Holy Relationship) ca (connects) tam (the one Self) it (in) sakhitva (brotherhood) īmahe (to request or ask) taṃ (the one Self) rāye (streaming) taṃ (in four parts) suvīrye (the holy and heroic) sa (word of god) śakra (the Mighty One) uta (speaking for) naḥ (the whole) śakat (wheeled vehicle) indro (driving the selfless) vasu (Vasu) da-yamā-naḥ (to grant Yama wholeness)

My notes:

The meaning of "sutesu" eluded me for quite some time. I tried dividing it every possible way, but nothing seemed right until I discovered that "sut" means "charioteer," while "Esu" can mean Jesus Christ. And, as we've established, Jesus Christ and Vishnu are two symbolic forms of the Vishwapurusha. Furthermore, "E" is Vedic shorthand for Vishnu, so "E-su" can only mean "Holy Vishnu."

Okay, so ... if Esu is Vishnu, who is his charioteer?

At first, I thought it might be Krishna, the charioteer in the Bhavagad Gita. But all the sources I consulted identified Vishnu's charioteer as Garuda, Hari's divine golden-eagle "vahana." And that makes a lot of sense, especially since Lakshmi is often depicted "riding along" with Vishnu on Garuda in Hindu iconography. 

Vishnu and Lakshmi astride Garuda.
What does Garuda represent in the vast and complex Hindu pantheon? Once again, the name provides the answer. Garuda is a compound of "ga" (the sacred-syllable, Om) and "ruda" (crying or weeping). So, the name means either "the Om weeping" or "the cry of the Om." Either way, our friend Garuda personifies the Living Water that is indeed Lord Vishnu's "vehicle" or "charioteer" in the dream-realm.

In the Mahabharata epic, which tells the story of Garuda's birth, the gold-winged eagle-man is identified as the younger brother of Aruna, the charioteer of Surya-dev, the Sun God. And Aruna, as we've established, is another form of the Red Ray, which "drives" or "carries" the Sun (Son) of God -- the Greater Light of the connected God and Christ Minds -- in the dream-realm. So, the Living Water is the "little brother" of the Red Ray.

From the Mahabharata epic, we also learn that Garuda’s mother, Vinata, was tricked into becoming the slave of her sister, Kadru, the mother of the nagas -- the snakes associated with Shiva. Kudra means "the Great Purusha's pole-star," while Vinata means "the dance of duality" or "the dance of separation." So, Kadru -- the "star" of God's Thought at the top of the dream -- "tricked" the dream-world into becoming her slave. And to free the dream-world from her clutches, Garuda (the Living Water) had to give the nagas a taste of Amrita -- the Blood Ray. Garuda performed that feat, thereby giving the snakes the ability to slough off their old skins (i.e., the ability to make the free-will choice to remain asleep in "the dance of duality" or to wake-up and remember the star).

And, as Course-Jesus explains in no-uncertain terms, "The Holy Spirit and the ego are the only choices open to you. God created one, and so you cannot eradicate it. You made the other, and so you can." (ACIM, T-5.V.6:8-10)

Seen in this light, the story of Garuda's birth is really about how the Holy Spirit 1) changed the world's purpose, 2) put the spark of the Red Ray in us to encourage and enable the choice to awaken, 3) generated the sin-dissolving Om, and 4) preserved our free-will.

Now that we better understand what Garuda represents, let's explore what this verse communicates on the whole. It is Garuda, the Living Water, who radiates the sound that connects our Soul-selves in Holy Relationship "to ask the One Self streaming in four parts ... to grant Yama wholeness."

The One Self streaming in four parts is King Indra, the Red Ray, Logos, and/or Word of God. When we chose the Ego Mind over God, we kicked King Indra off his throne by denying our True Identity as God's One Son. To return to his rightful place, Indra broke into quarters to "walk" the circle-journey back to the "throne room" on the Seventh Plane. Those quarters are "the selfless Vasu" -- the four aspects of Lakshmi embodying the quadrants. By joining in the brotherhood of the Holy Relationship, our Soul-selves move "the wheeled-vehicle" -- the Wheel of Life on which the circle-journey takes place -- forward in time. And only by returning King Indra to his throne can we grant Yama wholeness; Yama, the spark of the Red Ray and "seed of the True Vine" in all Living Beings (NOT the god of death).

Now, compare all I've just explained to what Course-Jesus says below:

The Thought of God surrounds your little kingdom, waiting at the barrier you built to come inside and shine upon the barren ground. See how life springs up everywhere! The desert becomes a garden, green and deep and quiet, offering rest to those who lost their way and wander in the dust. Give them a place of refuge, prepared by love for them where once a desert was. And everyone you welcome will bring love with him from Heaven for you. They enter one by one into this holy place, but they will not depart as they had come, alone. The love they brought with them will stay with them, as it will stay with you. And under its beneficence your little garden will expand, and reach out to everyone who thirsts for Living Water, but has grown too weary to go on alone. (ACIM, T-18.VIII.9:1-8)

Before we move on, I want to say two quick things. The first is that the Living Being with "the likeness of an eagle" in the Book of Revelations has to be related to Garuda. I'll have to go back and check, but I believe the eagle-like Living Being was Dhana, the Lakshmi aspect of the second quadrant, wherein we give and receive the Living Water to heal each other in the Circle of Forgiveness. So, that association makes sense.

The second thing I want to point out is that the Bhavacakra or Wheel of Life in Buddhism is held by Yama, the presumed "god of death." And that's why he looks like a demon. Unfortunately, that misconception of Yama has far-reaching tentacles. A central figure in Buddhist mythology, Yama also is (erroneously) perceived as the god of death by Buddhists in China, Tibet, and Japan. More accurately, Yama is the "marker" our Souls move around the circle-journey. How far we moved that "marker" forward or backward in each incarnation determines where we start the journey in the next one. And that is, I believe, why Yama is perceived as both "the god of death" and "the judge" of where Souls go after death.

The Buddhist Bhavacakra, held by a demonic-looking Yama.

With the new formatting, Rv 1.10.6 now reads: suvivrtam sunirajam indra tvadatam id vasah gavam apa vrajam vrdhi krnusva radho.

My translation:

Holiness made manifest, holiness without impurity, Indra is the one who gives to you the supreme Power and Glory of the Om-dispensing water-cistern (Shiva) to build interest in self-creating through loving kindness and devotion.

My word divisions and definitions:

su-vivṛtaṃ (holiness made manifest) su-nirajam (holiness without impurities) indra (Indra) tvādātam (is the one who gives to you) id (the supreme power) yaśaḥ (and glory) ga-vām (of the Om-dispensing -- NOT "belonging to the cows") apa (water) vrajaṃ (cistern) vṛdhi (to build interest in) kṛṇu-ṣva (self-creating) rādho (through loving kindness and devotion)

My notes:

As I understand things, the Om-dispensing water cistern also is the wellspring, the Golden Egg, the Spiritual Moon, and the water-palanquin of Vishnu-Narayana-Ishvara -- all of which are Shiva, the "mouth" through which King Indra calls us to remember the Oneness we share with each other and God (in the everlasting Covenant of Love).

Shiva is, therefore, the Holy Spirit. But so are Vishnu and Indra. And this is one reason I prefer Hinduism and its complex pantheon of deities, confusing though they are, to Christianity's overly simplified and altogether erroneous Holy Trinity. Rightmindedly perceived, the Holy Spirit of Grace is the ONLY Holy Power operating inside the Temple of our dreaming minds. S/he simply takes different forms or performs various functions to "unhinder" or "unobstruct" the channel through which God communicates with His Creations -- the channel we blocked when we chose the Ego Mind (Brahma) as our co-creator over God (Brahman).

Or, to quote Course-Jesus:

Perception did not exist until the separation introduced degrees, aspects and intervals. Spirit has no levels, and all conflict arises from the concept of levels. Only the Levels of the Trinity are capable of unity. The levels created by the separation cannot but conflict. This is because they are meaningless to each other.
Still operating in the lower levels of perception, we can't really grasp what he means by this. Neither can we know if he's speaking of the Holy Trinity in Heaven proper (God, the Father, Cause, or Creator; Christ; the Son, Effect, or Created; and Agape, the Creative Force binding the two together in the Covenant of Perfect Creation) or the Atonement Trinity working together in the dream to wake us up (the Red Ray, the Water Ray, and the "forgiveness vehicle" through which they move and operate within the Temple).
One way we might view the second or Lesser-Light Trinity working in three-in-one unity is this:

Indra, the Red Ray = the Word of God
Shiva, the Atonement or Forgiveness "vehicle" = the Mouth of God
Vishnu, the Water Ray = the Voice of God

Vishnu (the Water Ray) speaks of and for Indra (the Blood Ray) through Shiva (the already accomplished Atonement Plan playing out in the dream of time).

In Hinduism, Shiva and Vishnu are correctly perceived as two complementary, harmonious, and inseparable aspects of the same cosmic function -- the function of freeing our Souls from the Wheel of Karma and/or Rebirth through love and forgiveness. Yes, the two deific powers are joined at the hip, so to speak, but they still play unique roles in the Atonement process.

Shiva is the cistern, while Vishnu is the water pouring out of the cistern. Shiva is the water-palanquin, while Vishnu is the passenger he carries and protects (along with Lakshmi) in the dark waters of ego thought; Shiva is the Golden Egg, while Vishnu is the embryo growing and evolving within its protective shell; Shiva is the Moon, while Vishnu is the moonbeams shining down on the world; Shiva is the chalice, while Vishnu is the wine within the cup we must drink and absorb to remember the Truth of our Being; Shiva is the toolbox, while Vishnu embodies the tools; Shiva is the passive or inert aspect of the Atonement, while Vishnu is his hard-working Om-budsman (pun intended).

Vishnu, displaying the tools of Atonement he both provides and embodies.

After writing some of this yesterday, I had dinner and watched a little television with my husband before retiring for the evening. About 2:30 a.m., I awoke and decided to meditate on the Living Water. As I silently chanted "Om Hari Om," questions about Shiva and Vishnu danced through my mind. What is their true relationship to each other? What are they really? I prayed for clarity. And then, I saw -- or simply knew. Shiva is the all-powerful Ark of the Covenant that destroys the ILLUSION of enmity, conflict, and separation. And that is why the Ark was believed to destroy armies if and when it led the way into battle. There are no enemies forgiveness can't destroy because all our perceived enemies are figments of the distorted perception True Forgiveness corrects.

God would not have His Son embattled, and so His Son’s imagined “enemy” is totally unreal. You are but trying to escape a bitter war from which you HAVE escaped. The war is gone. For you have heard the hymn of freedom rising unto Heaven. Gladness and joy belong to God for your release, because you made it not. Yet as you made not freedom, so you made not a war that could endanger freedom. Nothing destructive ever was or will be. The war, the guilt, the past are gone as one into the unreality from which they came. (ACIM, T-13.XI.2:1-8)

The Ark of the Covenant is Shiva, the transformational "vehicle" of True Forgiveness, which is the miracle or rightminded perception.

And that explains why Shiva is called "the destroyer" in Hinduism. Rightly understood, Shiva destroys the false perceptions of enmity and conflict chaining us to the Wheel of Karma.

Vishnu, meanwhile, dwells within the Shiva-Ark with our Souls to preserve the Covenant of Love that is the Holy Relationship. And that is the true reason he is called "the preserver." Hari preserves the "covenant" of the shared Higher Mind, NOT the false creations of Brahma.

To destroy the truth-blocking Ego Mind we have to join in Holy Relationship in the Circle of Forgiveness. And that Holy Circle also is Shiva, the "vehicle" through which True Forgiveness is achieved. Course-Jesus discusses that "ark" at length in two places in the Text, under the headings "Entering the Ark" and "The Ark of Safety." I urge you to read both sections carefully.

This symbiotic relationship between Shiva and Vishnu makes clear why their various personas are so often linked in the Hindu lore: As Hari-Hara, Nara-Narayana, and Ishana-Ishvara, to name a few. I'm sure there are more examples, but those are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head.

Keeping in mind that Indra, Shiva, and Vishnu are three interwoven "aspects" of the Holy Spirit of God's Grace, let's read a passage from the Course wherein Jesus explains the Holy Spirit's genesis and function. As a teaching aid, I've added the Hindu names representing each "aspect" in brackets.

The Holy Spirit is the Christ Mind [Indra] which is aware of the knowledge that lies beyond perception. He came into being with the separation as a protection, inspiring the atonement principle [Shiva] at the same time. Before that there was no need for healing, for no one was comfortless. The Voice of the Holy Spirit [Vishnu] is the Call to Atonement, or the restoration of the integrity of the mind. When the Atonement is complete and the whole Sonship is healed, there will be no Call to Return. But what God creates is eternal. The Holy Spirit will remain with the Sons of God, to bless their creations and keep them in the Light of Joy. (ACIM, T-5.I.5:1-7)

Here's my take on what he says: Indra, the Christ Mind's representative in the dream-realm, "came into being with the separation as a protection" (of Creation's wholeness or oneness). Indra, the Blood Ray, didn't, therefore, exist before the separation. But God's Word (the thought God extended to create the Sonship) certainly did. So the Blood Ray embodies and protects the Word of God in the dream, but isn't the original Word of God (which is still in Heaven). He's the embodiment of Grace, in other words, the gentler restorative aspect of Agape.

At the same time Indra came into being, he inspired the Atonement principle of forgiveness (Shiva). And it is that aspect that sounds the Call to Awaken (Vishnu). Before all this happened, there was no Holy Spirit in Heaven. Ergo, the Holy Spirit isn't part of the True Trinity. But, having been created by God, the Spirit of Grace will continue to exist even after the separation ends -- to guide our joint creative endeavors and ensure the mad idea of self-creating (apart from God) never infects the Sonship again. And that's how we know the nightmare won't happen again or keep repeating "to endlessly evolve the universe," as some spiritual teachers ignorantly profess.

The Rik's next line, Rv 1.10.7, now reads: adrivah nah itva rodasi ubhe rghayamanam invatah jesah svaratir apah sam ga.

My translation:

To manifest Kamadeva (the Love of God) bearing the whole state of being -- Heaven and Earth, together in unified oneness -- cultivate the deep inner-peace bringing forward the now-moment to open the mouth of God, the celestial vessel producing the Living Water of God's Word, the sacred-syllable, Om.

My word divisions and definitions:

adr-ivaḥ (to manifest "i-vah" = kamadeva -- the love of God, rather than the god of love -- bearing or conveying) nah-itvā, rather than nahi-tva (the whole state of being) rodasī (Heaven and earth) ubhe (together) ṛghāy-amāṇam (cultivate the deep inner-peace) inv-ataḥ (bringing forward the now-moment) jeṣaḥ (to open the mouth of God) svarvat-īr (the celestial vessel producing) apaḥ (the Living Water) saṃ (of the Word of God) gā (the Sacred Syllable, Om)
My notes:

This verse not only affirms everything I just explained, it also clarifies how the system works. To manifest the Perfect Love holding Creation together as a whole, we need to cultivate the deep inner peace the Blood Ray (Indra) embodies. Course-Jesus tells us the same thing -- often and emphatically. And it just so happens that today, my workbook lesson is a review of Lesson 185: I want the peace of God.
In the review, Jesus gives us a prayer to recite, which pretty much says it all:

The peace of God is everything I want. The peace of God is my one goal; the aim of all my living here, the end I seek, my purpose and my function and my life, while I abide where I am not at home.

What this Vedic verse also explains is that to cultivate that deep inner-peace, we must open the mouth of God in the now-moment or Holy Instant (in Course terms) to receive the Living Water of God's Word -- the sacred-syllable, Om. So, Shiva (the Mouth), releases Vishnu (the Voice), which is produced by Indra (the Word). And the Word is Om. So, Indra is the Om, which "trickles down" to us, so to speak, through Shiva and Vishnu.

To translate this verse correctly, I had to know a couple of key things. The first is that "I" is the Vedic cypher for Kamadeva; and the second is that Kamadeva represents the Love of God (rather than the god of love) in the original teachings of Hinduism.

Like Agni and so many other Hindu gods, what Kamadeva truly personifies reversed when we projected the idea of Perfect Love out of our minds into the world we made to feel "special." And just as we blocked the Fire of God's Presence (Agni) with the projection of elemental fire, we blocked God's all-encompassing, all-inclusive, and equally-bestowed Perfect or Divine Love with our futile outward-focused search for what Course-Jesus calls "special love."

As he eloquently explains at one point:

You cannot love parts of reality and understand what love means. If you would love unlike to God, Who knows no special love, how can you understand it? To believe that SPECIAL relationships, with SPECIAL love, can offer you salvation is the belief that separation is salvation. For it is the complete equality of the Atonement in which salvation lies. How can you decide that special aspects of the Sonship can give you more than others? The past has taught you this. Yet the Holy Instant teaches you it is not so. (ACIM, T-15.V.3:1-7

The erroneous belief that Kamadeva represents "erotic love, pleasure, and desire" and is, therefore, the Hindu equivalent of Cupid is alarmingly ubiquitous. Google tells us this; Wikipedia tells us this; the Wisdom Library tells us this; Sacred Texts tells us this; and so does pretty much everything else on the Internet, of Hindu origin or otherwise. What, then, makes me so sure they've all got it wrong?

Kamadeva carrying the four aspects of Lakshmi aboard a time-eating peacock.

The name "Kamadeva," for starters. I'm convinced that "kam" means not desire or lust, but "love." Add the "a" at the end to make "kama" and you've got "Love of God," plus "deva" -- a word meaning "exalted being" or "heavenly being." So, the name "Kamadeva" literally translates as "the Love of God as exalted being." The word "kama" also can be divided as "ka" (the Great Purusha) and "ma" (producing or creating). Either way, lust never enters the picture.

In the Hindu lore, Kamadeva also is assigned three other names: Manmatha, Madana, and Anaga. Look them up and you'll (unhelpfully) find them defined as "love," "the Indian Cupid," or "the god of love." You might further (misleadingly) learn that "Manmatha" means "that which agitates the mind," which can certainly be said of "special love." But Manmatha -- a marriage of "man(a)" and "matha" -- actually means "the Mind of the Temple of Learning." And the Temple of Learning is the Spiritual Body. Likewise, Madana means not "love," but "producing selfless giving," while "Anaga" means "faultless," "without sin," or "pure."

Need I say more?

Kamadeva and Rati on their green-parrot vahana, Suka.

Well, yes ... I suppose I must, because Kamadeva's consort, constant companion, and fellow teacher is Rati, who (like Mary Magdalene, the wife of Jesus) has been painted as a whore by the slanderous Ego Mind and its agents. And someone needs to defend the poor devi's honor. Google "Rati," and you'll find her described as "the Hindu goddess of love, carnal desire, lust, passion, and sexual pleasure," when nothing could be farther from the truth.

Contrary to what Wikipedia reports, the name Rati is a marriage of "ra" (that which is radiant within) and "ti" (three). So, what Rati actually represents are the three "radiances" or "rays" emanating from, but still firmly attached to, God's Love within the Temple of Learning. Those three rays are Peace (Indra), Joy (Vishnu), and Forgiveness (Shiva) -- the latter of which is the closest we can come to Divine Love in the dream, according to Course-Jesus. And that is why Rati and Kamadeva are correctly characterized in the Hindu literature as "inseparable companions" and "co-teachers."

Far from being "the Hindu goddess of love, carnal desire, lust, passion, and sexual pleasure," Rati represents the Atonement Trinity working together under the power of God's Will and Authority to wake us up. She is, in essence, Kamadeva's partner and proxy in the dream of separation.

A particularly beautiful depiction of Kamadeva astride his vahana.

To convince you beyond a shadow of a doubt that Kamadeva represents Divine Love, let's briefly explore the symbols generally associated with the so-called "Indian Cupid." First and foremost, he rides a green parrot called "Suka" -- a compound of "su" (holy or sacred) and "ka" (the Great Purusha). And the Purusha is the Cosmic Being, Universal Principle, or Light of God underneath the illusion of form. And that "being," "principle," or "light" is Perfect Love -- ergo, Kamadeva, the Love of God, "bears the whole state of being, of Heaven and earth together," as stated in this Vedic verse. As a symbol in and of itself, the parrot represents communication or, more specifically, God's pure communications, while the color green is associated with the Anahata or Heart Chakra -- the proverbial mouth through which Indra speaks God's "heart-cave" thoughts inside the Temple (through Shiva and Vishnu).
That Kamadeva carries a bow and arrow might be one reason he's confused with Cupid. Unlike Cupid's weapon, however, Kamadeva's bow is made from sugarcane, with a beeline for a string -- symbols representing "the sweet and constant communication" (to quote Course-Jesus) God shares with us through the Atonement Trinity.
Also unlike Cupid, Kamadeva doesn't shoot arrows to make mischief among humans. His quiver holds flowers, but not any-old flowers; five very specific flowers: a white lotus, a blue lotus, a mango-tree flower, an Ashoka-tree flower, and jasmine flowers. I'm certain they each represent something more spiritually meaningful than what the Google-bot tells us they represent, all of which are aspects of ego-inspired "special love."

Let's proceed to the next verse. Rv 1.10.8 contains several words we've encountered before, as well as a handful of "unsolved mysteries" in Vedic and Sanskrit scholarship (all of which I've striven to decipher). Far away from Muller's standard construction, the line reads: asmabhyam dhunuhi asrutkarna srudhi havam nu dadhisva me girah indra stomam imam mama krsva.

My translation:
The grindstone of fear, the continuous sound of the "U" compels attentive listening to that which is heard; the call of now-consciousness granting knowledge of one's own Higher Self to restore the voice of King Indra speaking from the mouth of the Dear Friend, Krishna-Shiva.
My divisions and definitions:

asma-bhyaṃ (the grindstone of fear) dhūn-u-hi (the continuous sound of "U" compels) āśrutkarṇa (attentive listening) śrudhī (to that which is heard) havaṃ (the call of) nū (now) cid (consciousness) dadhiṣva (granting knowledge of one's own Higher Self) me (to restore) giraḥ (the voice of) indra (King Indra, the Red Ray) stomam (speaking from) imam (the mouth of) mama (the dear friend) kṛ-ṣvā (aiding the Soul or Krishna-Shiva)
My notes:
In the Course, Jesus tells us the Holy Spirit is both the Call to Awaken and the Dear Friend. In Hinduism, the Call to Awaken is personified as Vishnu, coming from Shiva, while "dear friend" is a description applied to both Shiva and Krishna (the eighth incarnation of Vishnu). So, the enigmatic "krsva," which appears five times in the Rig Veda, could easily mean "Krishna and Shiva," who are indeed closely linked in the Hindu literature. Krishna is, in fact, the Christ-realized form of Vishnu.
In the following from the Course, Jesus parrots this Vedic verse (and the next one) in mind-blowing ways:

I have assured you that the Mind that decided for me is also in you, and that you can let it change you just as it changed me. This Mind is unequivocal, because it hears only one Voice and answers in only one way. You are the light of the world with me. Rest does not come from sleeping but from waking. The Holy Spirit is the Call to awaken and be glad. The world is very tired, because it is the idea of weariness. Our task is the joyous one of waking it to the Call for God. Everyone will answer the Call of the Holy Spirit, or the Sonship cannot be as one. What better vocation could there be for any part of the Kingdom than to restore it to the perfect integration that can make it whole? Hear only this through the Holy Spirit within you, and teach your brothers to listen as I am teaching you. When you are tempted by the wrong voice, call on me to remind you how to heal by sharing my decision and making it stronger. As we share this goal, we increase its power to attract the whole Sonship, and to bring it back into the oneness in which it was created. Remember that “yoke” means “join together,” and “burden” means “message.” Let us restate “My yoke is easy and my burden light” in this way; “Let us join together, for my message is light.” (ACIM, T-5.II.10:1–11:4)
According to the Agni Purana, the letter "U" means both "Shiva" and "protection." Other sources say the stand-alone letter "U" also can denote the moon. And that's right, figuratively speaking, because Shiva is indeed another name for Soma, the Golden Circle of Forgiveness glowing in the "Night" of ego ignorance. And, as we've learned in previous Suktas, Shiva also is Shesha, the five-headed serpent water-palanquin keeping Vishnu-Narayana afloat in the thought-waters of perception.
Confusing, isn't it?
The "U" referenced herein is almost certainly the "U" in both Anu, the three-part Name of God, and AUM, an alternative spelling of Om. There's a lot of speculation out there about what AUM and its three letters represent, very little of which is accurate. Om/Aum is not, for example, the primordial sound that brought material creation into being. Rather, Om/Aum is God's gentle-yet-effective remedy for the madness provoking material miscreation. The vibratory "song" of the Red Ray, Om/Aum gently and gradually dissolves, layer by layer, the projected thought-forms imprisoning our Soul-minds in the dream of separation. The sound is, in effect, God speaking to us, through the Christ Mind, at a frequency that acts upon our minds in the manner of a vibratory cleaning device.

Or, as Course-Jesus explains:

The principle of Atonement [Shiva] and the separation began at the same time. When the ego was made, God placed in the mind the Call to joy. This Call is so strong that the ego always dissolves at Its sound. That is why you must choose to hear one of two voices within you. One you made yourself, and that one is not of God. But the other is given you by God, Who asks you only to listen to it. The Holy Spirit is in you in a very literal sense. His is the Voice that calls you back to where you were before and will be again. It is possible even in this world to hear only that Voice and no other. It takes effort and great willingness to learn. It is the final lesson that I learned, and God’s Sons are as equal as learners as they are as Sons. (ACIM, T-5.II.3:1-11)

Om/Aum is the "music" Nataraja-Shiva broadcasts to advance the Wheel of the Soul's spiritual journey at the universal level. As Jesus and the rishis all explain, listening to the sound turns the wheel faster for everybody.

Nearer the truth is that the "U" in AUM "represents the steadiness that carries us along (in the dream-state), and maintains Creation in a state of equilibrium" -- but only if by "creation" we mean Brahman's "big-C" Creation, and NOT Brahma's cheap and tawdry truth-blocking substitute. The "U" stands for, I believe, Uchchaihshravas, "the Mighty Horse stabilizing the Great Purusha's cycles of the universe." And Uchchaihshravas -- "that which ends dividing the glory of the All" -- is Shiva, the "forgiveness" aspect of the Atonement Trinity. And that is why Shiva is known as both "the destroyer" and "the transcendent aspect of Brahman."

Because, as Course-Jesus explains: 

Forgiveness is the healing of the perception of separation. Correct perception of your brother is necessary, because minds have chosen to see themselves as separate. Spirit knows God completely. That is its miraculous power. The fact that each one has this power completely is a condition entirely alien to the world’s thinking. The world believes that if anyone has everything, there is nothing left. But God’s miracles are as total as His Thoughts because they ARE His Thoughts. (ACIM, T-3.V.9:1-7)

In another part of the Course, he says:

From knowledge, where He has been placed by God, the Holy Spirit calls to you, to let forgiveness rest upon your dreams, and be restored to sanity and peace of mind. Without forgiveness will your dreams remain to terrify you. And the memory of all your Father’s Love will not return to signify the end of dreams has come.

Accept your Father’s gift. It is a Call from Love to Love, that It be but Itself. The Holy Spirit is His gift, by which the quietness of Heaven is restored to God’s beloved Son. Would you refuse to take the function of completing God, when all He wills is that you be complete?

(ACIM, W-pII.7.4:1–5:4)  

Most things I've read equate the "U" in AUM with Vishnu, the "preserver," and the "M" with Shiva, "the destroyer." Not sure why, but it makes more sense the other way around. Not that we can really separate the Voice from the Mouth.

Even so, the AUM is a powerful tool for our salvation, given to us by God through the Holy Spirit. And since all the tools of salvation arose from the churning of the Ocean of Milk, it only stands to reason that the three components the letters represent can be found in that vitally important allegory.

Rather than leave you guessing, I'll tell you outright what I believe they are:

A = Amrita, "the elixir of immortality" that is the Call to Awaken (Indra)

U = Uchchaihshravas, the "Mighty Horse" conveying the Call (Shiva)

M = Madeira, the wine of truth we "hear" and "drink" to undo the perceived separation and restore the Covenant of Love that is the Holy Relationship (Vishnu)

If you've been following my blog, you'll know that the phrase "wine of truth" came up in a previous discussion, when I retranslated on the fly a verse from Rv 1.19 to prove a point. The verse read:

The first red ray of dawn, the true state of being in the Walled City protecting the Creator's dream-destroying Wine of Truth, produces the sound arising from the fiery baptism of God's family name. 

The Sanskrit word translated as "wine of truth" was "madhu," which occurs about twenty times in the Rig Veda (according to Google-bot). As explained in the post where it came up, the definition of "madhu" has evolved over time. Presumed today to mean "honey" or "sweet," the word originally meant "mead" -- a wine made from honey, which, in ancient times, was known as the "wine of truth." 


Madeira, the "wine of truth" that emerged from the Ocean of Milk, is personified in Hinduism as Varuni, the goddess of "spiritual wine" that brings joy to the Soul. And that "madeira" or "madhu" is the true "drink" provided by Soma. It's also the symbolic "wine" in the equally symbolic "chalice" Jesus passed among his disciples at the Last Supper. And that "wine" is indeed "the blood of the new and everlasting covenant." Not the "blood" from the veins of Jesus, the man; but the "Amrita" from the Red Ray -- the Word of God or Logos, whose vibratory Call to Forgive preserves the Covenant of Love by "washing away the perceptual errors of the world."

 

Now that we better apprehend what AUM represents, let's debunk one of the most common misnomers surrounding the sound. The Yogic Encyclopedia, for example, explains:

All of manifestation is created, preserved in the created state for some time, then eventually destroyed. AUM, therefore, encompasses the three vibratory energies required to create, preserve, and destroy, and each of these energies vibrates at a different frequency.

The three letters of AUM represent these three vibrations inherent in creation. (Even through the variant spelling in English is "Om," AUM is more accurate.) "A (Akaar)" represents the vibration that brings into manifestation the created universe; "U (Ukaar)" represents the vibration that preserves the creation; and "M" (Makaar)" represents the destructive vibration that dissolves the manifested universe back into Infinite Spirit.

Partly right and partly wrong, this definition suffers from what Course-Jesus calls "level confusion." AUM is a gift from Brahman, who has nothing to do with material creation -- apart from providing us with the tools to end the madness. Only Brahma, the Ego Mind,  "creates to destroy." Brahman's creations are eternal, unchanging, and formless. The three letters of AUM represent, therefore, not "the three vibrations inherent in creation," but the three-in-one vibratory powers sounding in unison to bring about our liberation from self-creating madness run amok.

Like I said in a much earlier post, those are the three Holy Powers making up the real Atonement Trinity, which does NOT include the imposter-creator Brahma. In run-of-the-mill Hinduism (if such a thing exists), Shiva is more often called "the destroyer" than "the protector." In truth, he is both. Rightly understood (as this verse explains), Shiva protects the wholeness of God's Holy Creation by destroying the dark, deceptive, and divisive "self-creations" promoted by Brahma.

Okay, so ... if "krsva" does indeed mean "Krishna and Shiva," this Vedic verse also explains that Shiva and Krishna join forces to speak for King Indra, the Red Ray. And that jibes in many respects with the story of King Indra surrendering his earthly authority to Krishna (as told in the Harivamsha Purana, an appendix to the Mahabharata epic delineating the lineage of Krishna).

Let's move on to the next verse (Rv 1.10.9), which now reads: yujas cid antaram hi tva vrsantamam vajesu havanasrutam vrsantamasya humaha utim sahasrasatamam a tuna.

My translation:

Unite in thought within the shared mind compelling the self obstructing the peaceful holy vibration to offer the oblation received through hearing Shiva, the mouth of the one Self, the Great God protecting the mighty essence of wholeness in God's quiver.

My divisions and definitions:

yujaś (unite to receive) cid (the consciousness) antaram (within) vidmā (the shared mind) hi (compelling) tvā (the self) vṛ-ṣantamaṃ (obstructing the peaceful) vājeṣu (holy vibration) havana-śrutam (to offer the oblation received through hearing) vṛṣan-tam-asya (Indra or Shiva, the mouth of the one self) hūmaha (the Great God) ūtiṃ (protecting) sahas-rasā-tamām (the mighty essence of wholeness) ā (in God's) tūna (quiver).

My notes:

Some sources say "vrsan" is a name for Indra, while others say it refers to Shiva. I went with Shiva for these reasons: 1) Vrsan also means "bull" and Shiva's vahana is a bull; 2) Shiva rather than Indra is known as "the Great God"; 3) Shiva is recognized in Hinduism as the protector of Creation's wholeness; and 4) Shiva is the mouth of the One Self that is Indra. 
Unacquainted with the metaphor "God's quiver," I looked it up. And guess what? The same figure of speech is used three times in the Old Testament of the Holy Bible. In Isaiah 49:2, Psalms 127:5, and Lamentations 3:13. Having read the latter two, I distrust their translations, so I'll only share and comment on the following from Isaiah:

And he hath made my mouth like a sharp sword; in the shadow of his hand hath he hid me, and made me a polished shaft; in his quiver hath he hid me; and said unto me, "Thou art my servant, O Israel, in whom I will be glorified."
We were, in other words, born into this world to serve and glorify God -- not to do our own thing. And everything we experience is designed to hone us into sharp arrows in God's quiver, to be shot from His Bow at the right time in the dream to move the Atonement Plan forward.


One more verse to go, and it's a whopper.  There are, in fact, only ten lines in the tenth Sukta, rather than the twelve designated by Max Muller. The final line, which is rather long, reads: indra ka-uśika mandasānaḥ sutam  piba navyam āyuḥ pra sū tira kṛdhī sahas-rasām ṛṣim pari tvā girvaṇo gira imā bhavantu viśva-taḥ vṛd-dhā-yum anu vṛd-dhayo juṣṭā bhavantu juṣṭayaḥ.

My translation:

Indra, the silent Purusha; the fire of life in the sacred sound; the drinking vessel of life advancing holiness through creative thought, the mighty essence of the Rishi Circle; the Self speaking in praise of the Om, the voice from the Mouth of the All, the whole underneath, growing upwards in glory to connect with Anu, the Ancient One endowing the All with Divine Light.

My word divisions and definitions:

indra (Indra) ka-uśika (the silent purusha) mandasānaḥ (the fire of life) sutam (in the sacred sound) piba (the drinking) navyam (vessel) āyuḥ (of life) pra (advancing) sū (holiness) tira (through) kṛdhī (creative thought) sahas-rasām (the mighty essence of) ṛṣim (the rishi) pari (circle) tvā (the Self) girvaṇo (speaking in praise of the Om) gira (the voice) imā (from the mouth of) bhavantu (the all) viśva-taḥ (the whole underneath) vṛd-dhā-yum (growing upwards in glory to connect with) anu (Anu) vṛd-dhayo (the ancient one ) juṣṭā (endowing) bhavantu (the all) juṣṭayaḥ (with divine light)

My notes:

Wow. Told you this was a humdinger of a finale. It's also a fantastic encyclopedic definition of what Indra represents in the Hindu pantheon. Such a shame he isn't worshipped anymore in India. But maybe he will be again after more people find my blog.

Most of this echoes our previous discussions about Indra. The two things that stand out as worthy of further investigation and discussion are the phrases "the silent Purusha" and "the Rishi Circle."  To my mind, identifying Indra as "the silent Purusha" suggests that the Red Ray exists in the state of being known as "the silence beyond Om." I won't comment further until I do more research, but my intuition tells me that's right. 

The Rishi Circle is another mystery. My gut tells me it's a reference to the circle of miracle-workers on a higher plane sending healing energy into the world through the Om vibration. I also suspect the Rishi Circle is somehow related to the circle of elders John the Elder describes in Revelations 4:4, as well as (perhaps) the Teachers of Teachers Course-Jesus discusses in the Manual for Teachers. Again, I'll say no more until I receive further clarification.

Okay, so ... that's the tenth Sukta, done and dusted.  And what a beautiful and insightful teaching! I'm in awe, truly, and so grateful for this gift.

Until next time, Om Hari Om and God bless.

Monday, February 3, 2025

The Rig Veda's Ninth Sukta: Who are Matsya, Prithvi & Prithu?



We've now come to the Rig Veda's ninth Sukta -- and I wish I could say the translation process is getting easier. But that wouldn't be wholly true. What I can say -- in complete honesty -- is that I'm still learning and expanding my understanding of the labyrinthian morass that is Hinduism. I'm also embracing Hinduism and its accoutrements in ways I don't fully understand. But so be it. As in the image above from the story of Matsya and Manu Satyavrata (which we'll explore shortly), my little boat full of rishis is being pulled through the waters by Lord Vishnu, the Vishwapurusha in his "fish" form -- a form representing the Living Water.

This will all make sense in a minute, so let's get to it without further ado. In transliterated Sanskrit, Rv 1.9.1 reads: indrehi matsy(a) '(e)ndhaso visvebhih soma-parvanhih maham abhistir ojasa. Those words translate into English thusly:

King Indra, the Holy One, sends forth Matsya, the water of joy, to kindle the Om, the light of wholeness Soma's cycles bring to fullness in the scattered sparks of God's radiant energy.

[H. H. Wilson translated the same words as: Come, Indra, and be regaled with all viands libations, and thence, mighty in strength, be victorious (over your foes).]

My definitions: 

indrehi (King Indra, the Holy One, sends forth ) matsy(a) (Matsya, "the joyous one" or "water of joy") '(e)ndhas-o (to kindle the Om) viśve-bhiḥ (the light of wholeness) soma-parvan-hiḥ (Soma's cycles bring to) mahām̐ (fullness) abhiṣṭir (in the scattered sparks of) ojas-ā (God's radiant energy)

My notes: 

Let's start with the name. Matsya is, I believe, a marriage of "ma" (producing) and "t(a)sya" (the Holy Name or the Name of God). And it is indeed the Water Ray or Light of Joy that produces the Living Water we hear. In Hinduism, Matsya is the first of ten avatars, incarnations, or manifestations assigned to Lord Vishnu, the Vishwapurusha (the Atonement "spirit" of the Christ Mind). Those ten avatars or "Dasavantaras" are (in order of appearance) 1) Matsya (a fish), 2) Kurma (a turtle), 3) Varaha (the boar-form that rescued and married Bhumi), 4) Narasimha (a man-lion hybrid), 5) Vamana (a dwarf), 6) Parasurama (Rama with an axe), 7) Rama himself, 8) Krishna (the Teacher of God), 9) Buddha (the Enlightened Being), and 10) Kalki, the prophesied final avatar, who will appear at the end of "Kali Yuga" (the current age lasting 432,000 years) to restore righteousness and order.

In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna (the seventh avatar of Vishnu) explains to his pupil, Arjuna: "Whenever there is a decline of righteousness and rise of unrighteousness ... I send forth Myself." And he did, indeed, "send forth" his Self in the second half of the 20th Century -- at a time when, according to Jesus, many Souls were moving backward on the journey. He sent himself forth in the form of "the voice" that dictated A Course in Miracles to Helen Schucman between 1965 and 1974. 


In his Matsya or "fish" persona, Vishnu looks like a merman.


The allegorical legend of Matsya bears a striking resemblance to the Biblical story of Noah's Ark. Hardly surprising, given that Truth is One. The protagonist is Manu Satyavrata (meaning "the mind's true purpose"), who is said to be the first man, as well as the progenitor of the human race. As the story goes, Manu was offering oblations by a river one day when a tiny fish jumped out of the water into his hands. Before he could throw it back, the fish asked for Manu's protection. To comply, Manu placed the fish in an earthenware jar, which it soon outgrew. He then returned the fish to the river, but that too proved too small very quickly. The same thing happened after he moved the fish to the much-larger Ganges River and, later, to the ocean. 

Eventually, the fish admitted to being an avatar of Lord Vishnu. After telling Manu the world would soon be destroyed by a great flood, the fish advised his protector to build a sizeable boat, into which he should put the seven rishis, a variety of plants, and one of each type of animal. When the flood started, Manu fastened the boat to the horn of the fish, using as a "tether" Vasuki, the divine snake coiled around Shiva's neck. The fish then pulled the boat through the floodwaters, until they reached the peaks of the Himalayas.

The story makes perfect sense when we comprehend the symbolism. Matsya, "the joyous one," represents the Water Ray, which "sings" the Song of Heaven or Call to Joy into our inner-ears to dissolve the parasitical Ego Mind. That Water Ray of Joy goes forth from King Indra, the Blood Ray of Peace, to "kindle the Om," as this Vedic verse explains. As Manu Satyavrata "protected" the sound within his mind, his consciousness grew beyond its previous limitations (as indicated by the progressively larger bodies of water into which he placed the growing fish).

What the story really represents is the four legs of the Soul's Journey. At the start of the allegory, we learn that Manu Satyavrata has been practicing spiritual austerities for thousands of years. He has, that is to say, been traveling for some time the Lotus Path of "Dharma" -- the first quarter of the circle-journey.

The fish jumping into Manu's hands represents his newly realized ability to hear the Living Water -- the obstacle-removing Om vibration. His willingness to protect the fish marks the start of the circle-journey's second leg of "Artha" -- giving to receive the priceless INTERNAL treasures of God, rather than seeking to obtain the worthless EXTERNAL fantasy-riches and false idols of the world. 

The boat represents the water-palanquin, Golden Egg, or cistern we enter on the third leg of the circle-journey -- the leg of "Kama." Guided by Vishnu, Manu takes refuge in the boat with the seven "seers" (the seven spirits or lamps "before the throne") and the "wholeness" consciousness of the Golden Circle (symbolized by the animals and plants).

Matsya then pulls Manu's boat to the peaks of the Himalayas, a long-time symbol of enlightenment. So, reaching the Himalayas represents his entrance into the quadrant of "Moksha," the circle's fourth and final "leg." The "tether" binding Matsya to the boat is, meaningfully, Vasuki -- the "naga" representing the purifying serpent-fire, Kundalini. This suggests that it's by the power of Kundalini that we graduate from the third to the fourth quadrant. Somewhere in the story, Matsya gives the Vedas to Manu to share with the human race, which he later "spawned" to restore "the mind's true purpose." The Water Ray, with Kundalini's help, in other words, gave higher Self-Knowledge to Manu to share with and illuminate all the dreaming parts of the Universal Mind.

Makes sense, right? And it also tells us the Holy Spirit's first "manifestation" in the formless void was the Water Ray or Mem power of Elohim. And that's precisely what the Bible also explains in Genesis 1:2, which reads: And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness (was) upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God [the Ruach of Elohim in the original Hebrew] moved upon the face of the waters [of thought, not H2O]. 


Let's move on to Rv 1.9.2, which reads: em evam srjata sute mandim indraya mandine cakrim visvani cakraye. By my calculations, those words read along these lines:

The course of the Holy Spirit (the at-one-ment or universal curriculum), created in the now-moment (the Holy Instant), begot the light body Indra's four embody in the circle of the totality of existence (the Golden Circle) belonging to the wheel (of the Soul's Journey).

(H. H. Wilson's virtually meaningless translation of the same line reads: The libation being prepared, present the exhilaration and efficacious (draught) to the rejoicing Indra, the accomplisher of all things.)

My definitions:

em (the course, path, or way) evaṃ (of the Holy Spirit) sṛj-ata (created in the now-moment) sute (begot) mandim (the light body or Temple) indr-āya (Indra's four "aspects") mandine (embody) cakriṃ (in the circle) viśvāni (of the totality of existence) cakraye (belonging to the wheel)

My notes: 

The Sanskrit experts tell us "em" almost always precedes the word "eva" when found in the Vedas -- and here we have the first instance of that verbal pairing. They further tell us the combination of "em" and "eva" means "indeed," "thusly," or "in this manner" -- the same thing "eva" allegedly means on its own. And that, quite frankly, defies logic. As explained in my last post, "eva" is almost certainly the Sanskrit word for the Holy Spirit. So, what might the oft-forerunning "em" mean?  Sadly, there's no clear answer, even in languages rooted in Sanskrit. The closely related Sanskrit word "ema," however, means "course, path, or way." It might also mean "universal wholeness" or "universal oneness," which is the real definition of "emma" in Hebrew (rather than "mother"). Because there's no way of knowing, let's go with "course" for now and see where it takes us.

In this line, we also encounter the perplexing and seemingly related words "mandim" and "mandine," which I've defined as "light body" and "embody," respectively. Indra's "four," could refer back to the "horses" referenced in the previous Sukta, but my money's on the Living Beings known in Hinduism as the "Chatuvidha Lakshmi." Why? Because those four "aspects" do indeed "embody" the circle-journey that IS the Holy Spirit's path, way, or course.


The Sukta's third line reads: matsya susipra mandibhih stomebhir visvacarsane sacaisu savanesva, which translates something akin to this:

Matsya (the Water Ray) is the power advancing the illuminating light preserving the spiritual vision of the universal being of the true and holy Word of God encircling the Higher Self.

(H. H. Wilson's cringe-worthy translation: Indra with the handsome chin, be pleased with these animating praises; do though, who art to be reverenced by all mankind (come) to these rites (with the gods.)

My definitions: 

matsyā (the joyous one) suśi-pra (is the power advancing) mandibhiḥ (the illuminating light) stomebhir (preserving the spiritual vision) viśva-carṣaṇe (of the universal being) sacai-ṣu (of the true and holy) sa-vane-ṣva = (Word of God encircling the Self)

My notes:

Okay, wait ... because, while searching for a cleaner copy of Wilson's translation, I was (mis)informed by the Google-bot that Wilson translated Rv 1.9.3 thusly: "Humility, not arrogance, is the path to highest wisdom." As astute as that sentiment is, it is NOT either a) how Wilson translated this line or b) what the line says in any way, shape, or form.

Try though I did, I could not solve the mystery of how this mix-up originated -- or where that teaching actually comes from -- because all my searches took me in circles. What I did discover is that Hindus put a lot of stock in the idea behind that quote -- as they should. Because humbling the ego is indeed an important step on the path to Higher Wisdom. It is not, however, the path itself, as the mysterious misquote seems to imply.

To quote Jesus: 

Of your ego you can do nothing to save yourself or others, but of your spirit you can do everything for the salvation of both. Humility is a lesson for the ego, not for the spirit. Spirit is beyond humility, because it recognizes its radiance and gladly sheds its light everywhere. The meek shall inherit the earth because their egos are humble, and this gives them truer perception. The Kingdom of Heaven is the spirit’s right, whose beauty and dignity are far beyond doubt, beyond perception, and stand forever as the mark of the Love of God for His creations, who are wholly worthy of Him and only of Him. Nothing else is sufficiently worthy to be a gift for a creation of God Himself. (ACIM, T-4.I.12:1-6

I made an educated guess that "mandibhih" meant something akin to "illuminating light" -- a foundational concept in Hindu theology. According to my research, the term refers to the symbolic representation of divine knowledge, enlightenment, and the victory of good, light, truth, and strength over evil, darkness, ignorance, and weakness. And it is this Hindus celebrate on Diwali (among other festivals), as well as what lighting the traditional "diya" is meant to signify. The flame itself represents the presence of divine energy -- and our connection to it -- during prayers and rituals.

Remarkably, Jesus never once uses the specific phrase "illuminating light" in the Course. He does, however, speak at length in several places about the light that facilitates vision. One such place is Workbook Lesson 92: Miracles are seen in light, and light and strength are one. In that lesson, he says:

It is God’s strength in you that is the light in which you see, as it is His Mind with which you think. His strength denies your weakness. It is your weakness that sees through the body’s eyes, peering about in darkness to behold the likeness of itself; the small, the weak, the sickly and the dying, those in need, the helpless and afraid, the sad, the poor, the starving and the joyless. These are seen through eyes that cannot see and cannot bless.

Strength overlooks these things by seeing past appearances. It keeps its steady gaze upon the light that lies beyond them. It unites with light, of which it is a part. It sees itself. It brings the light in which your Self appears. In darkness you perceive a self that is not there. Strength is the truth about you; weakness is an idol falsely worshipped and adored that strength may be dispelled, and darkness rule where God appointed that there should be light.

Strength comes from truth, and shines with light its Source has given it; weakness reflects the darkness of its maker. It is sick and looks on sickness, which is like itself. Truth is a savior and can only will for happiness and peace for everyone. It gives its strength to everyone who asks, in limitless supply. It sees that lack in anyone would be a lack in all. And so it gives its light that all may see and benefit as one. Its strength is shared, that it may bring to all the miracle in which they will unite in purpose and forgiveness and in love.

(ACIM, W-92.3:1–5:7)

Returning to the Vedic verse under discussion, "the true and holy Word of God encircling the Higher Self" is LOVE or, more accurately, AGAPE -- a form of love the Ego Mind can't comprehend. Agape, Perfect Love, or Divine Love also is a force too potent to be used to wake us up without 1) scaring the bejeezus out of us and 2) desecrating our free will. So, Indra-Elohim divided that supreme creative energy into the Joy Ray and the Peace Ray. The Joy Ray is the Water Ray and the Peace Ray is the Blood Ray. Thus, we experience "the Peace of God that defies (human) understanding" after the Water Ray cleanses our Soul-Spirit of all the Ego Mind's "chitta" -- the obstacles to peace housed in the ego-body or "human" unconscious-mind "storage container."

As Course-Jesus tells us, light and strength are one. And so are joy, peace, and love, because joy and peace retain all the attributes of their source -- just as we retain all the attributes of ours. Stated another way, we are still as perfect, innocent, powerful, and glorious as God, but in a slightly toned-down capacity (while in the dream-realm) -- just as joy and peace are still as powerful and glorious as Love, but in a slightly toned-down capacity. The moment we return to FULL capacity Agape (which is what we ARE), we are absorbed back into Heaven proper. And, just like that, the dream is over and forgotten in the proverbial Holy Instant.


Having explained to us what Matsya, the Water Ray, does, the Vedic rishis now tell us more about Indra, the Blood Ray. Rv 1.9.4 reads asrjram indra te girah prati tvam ud ahasata ajosavrsabham patim, which translates thusly:

The Blood Ray, Indra is the one speaking in the likeness of the Self higher up, belonging to the Greater Light up there, perpetually raining down the light of the Bridegroom.

[H. H. Wilson's translation: I have addressed to thee, Indra, the showerer (of blessings), the protector (of thy worshipers), praises which have reached thee, and of which thou hast approved.]

My definitions:

asṛj-ram (the Blood Ray) indra (Indra) te (is the one) giraḥ (speaking) prati (in the likeness) tvām (of the Self) ud (higher up) ahāsata (belonging to the Greater Light up there) ajoṣā = ajassa (eternally or perpetually) vṛṣabham (raining down the light) patim (of the Lord, Master, or Bridegroom).

My notes: 

Okay, so ... Indra, the Blood Ray, is God's vehicle in the dream of separation. God can't speak to us directly (because we blocked His channel with fire and ice), but He can still communicate with us through the Christ Mind (since Jesus reopened the channel). Thus, Indra speaks for the awake "Self higher up" and also "rains down" the Living Water, vibratory essence, and/or "illuminating light" coming from "the Bridegroom." And, as already established, Indra also is Elohim, "the One" on the chariot-throne. And that makes two things VERY clear. The first is that King Indra does indeed represent the Red Ray, Blood Ray, or "Blood of Christ" in the Hindu pantheon. The second is that Elohim does the same in the Old Testament.

What it doesn't make clear is why Indra is no longer worshipped in India. We might not be able to reach Indra (the Blood Ray that IS the Great Purusha) without going through the mediating Vishwapurusha, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't honor God's Host as we would honor God Himself. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think so.


Let's move on because, in the very next line (Rv 1.9.5) we learn the identity of the "four" beings mentioned a few verses back. We also solve the mystery of the Vasu -- or at least part of the mystery. The verse reads: sam codaya citram arvag radha indra varenyam asad it te vibhu prabhu asman. My research suggests those words translate as follows:

The Word of God urges forward the four Bright Ones, the spokes of the wheel speaking for selfless devotion and service to Indra, the chosen vehicle in unreality for the Supreme Lord of the Highest Heaven.

(Wilson's translation: Place before us, Indra, precious and multiform riches, for enough and more than enough are assuredly thine.) 

My definitions: 

saṃ (the Word of God) cod-aya (urges forward the four) citram (bright ones or celestial maidens) ar-vāg (the spokes of the wheel speaking for) rādha (selfless devotion and service) indra (to Indra) vareṇyam (the chosen vehicle) asad (in unreality) it (for) te (the) vibhu (Supreme) prabhu (Lord) asmān (of the highest heaven).

My notes:

Here, the rishis affirm that Indra is indeed God's vehicle in the dream of separation. They also tell us how the Wheel of the Soul's Journey moves forward. The Word of God -- the Om vibration coming down from Heaven -- advances the Wheel by "urging forward" the four Bright Ones -- the four Living Beings and/or aspects of Lakshmi who are also (I strongly suspect) the Vasu. Four of them, anyway -- if indeed there are eight, as commonly believed. And, FYI, Indra is also Allah, and the four "Bright Ones" are the "amlat al-arsh" -- the throne-bearers of Allah mentioned in the Qur'an. 


The four "aspects" of the Soul are the Living Creatures Ezekiel called Cherubim.


The four "aspects" of the Soul are the throne-bearers seen by Muhammed.


The four "aspects" (or their guardians) are also probably the four symbols of Chinese mythology.

Let's take a minute to revisit the Vasu, a word meaning "Bright Ones" in Sanskrit. According to Wikipedia, "The Vasu are a group of deities in Hinduism associated with fire and light. They are described as the attendant deities of Indra, and later Vishnu. Generally numbering eight and classified as the Ashtavasu, they are described in the Ramayana [epic] as the children of Kashyapa and Aditi, and in the Mahabharata as the sons of Manu or Dharma and a daughter of Daksha named Vasu. They are eight among the thirty-three gods mentioned in the Vedas."

(For lots of reasons, I question that there are in fact thirty-three gods mentioned in the Vedas. But that's neither here nor there in terms of our present topic of discussion.)

Let's start with Kashyapa, the father of the Vasu, as per the Ramayana epic. The name supposedly means "turtle" or "tortoise" (which doesn't tell us much), but it's actually a compound of "kashi" (light) and "apa" (water). So, Kashyapa almost certainly represents the two Great Rays, rather than "the first human rishi" or any Vedic scribe. His wife, Aditi is believed to be the Mother of the Cosmos, more or less; but her name tells a different story. A marriage of "adi" (the first) and "ti" (three), Aditi probably represents the Atonement Trinity -- the first three powers Indra/Elohim produced after entering the void to carry out God's Great Awakening Plan. If my interpretations are correct, the Vasu were created by the Great Rays in partnership with the Atonement Trinity. They can not, therefore, BE any of those five powers.

Since Indra is Elohim, the Atonement Trinity would be the Hindu equivalent of Aleph, Lamed, and Hey. Hard to say for sure, but I believe their Vedic counterparts are Agni (the Fire of God), Nara-Narayana (the redemption aspect of the Christ Mind), and Vayu (the Breath of God). If I'm right about this, then Indra, Varuna, Vishnu, Shiva, and Vayu -- in all their forms -- can't be among the Vasu.

Let's examine the evidence. This verse says there are four "Bright Ones" -- and that those four form the spokes of "the Wheel" the Word of God moves forward. The Wheel they mean has to be the Dharmachakra -- the Wheel of Samsara-Maya, Earthly Existence, Karma, Dharma, or Reincarnation (depending on the school of thought). For our purposes, it's the "wheel" around which the Soul (in four parts) makes its circle-journey from Dharma to Moksha.

A quick Internet search suggests the Dharmachakra features more prominently in Buddhism than in Hinduism. In Buddhism, the Wheel is generally assigned eight spokes representing the "legs" of the Noble Eightfold Path. But the Wheel can also have four spokes. And when that's the case, those four spokes represent the four stages of meditation. Those four stages are known as either the Dhyanas (a Sanskrit word meaning "meditative absorption") or the Jhanas (a Pali word meaning "meditation").

Now, what strikes me right off is that "Dhyana" is the name of one of the four Lakshmi aspects. And that suggests a couple of things. The first is that the four Dhyanas in Buddhism are probably related to the four legs of the Soul's Journey. The second is that Dhyana -- the third "aspect" of Lakshmi -- walks the path of "meditative absorption" on the circle-journey's third leg; the leg inside the Golden Egg; the leg during which, according to Course-Jesus, we have to give up every use the ego has for the body. So, "meditative absorption" probably is the order of the day. 


Dhyana-Lakshmi walks the path of "meditative absorption" to "water the seeds," so to speak, of her dreaming brethren. Is that why she's often depicted with baskets of grain?

 In case you're interested, the four Dhyanas/Jhanas are these (in a nutshell):

1) Freedom from desire: Freeing the mind from lower-mind thoughts and desires.

2) Freedom from discursive thoughts: Freeing the mind from thoughts involving reasoning and investigation (scholarship and scientific inquiry, for example).

3) Freedom from blissful states: Expanding the consciousness beyond blissful meditative states.

4) Perfect equanimity and wakefulness

(Clearly, I have a long way yet to go on the second leg of freeing the mind from reasoning and investigation. Lol. But maybe spiritual reasoning and investigation are exceptions to the rule.)

Let's jump back to the Vasu, because they're also commonly associated with the elements. What few grasp is that the associated elements are the sensory intangible and internal spiritual "elements" we've projected outward as sensory tangible and external material elements. As I see it, there are two celestial "beings" occupying each quadrant; the Lakshmi-aspect or Vasu assigned to that quarter of the circle and the deity governing or watching over that quadrant and aspect. And that's partly why it's all so bloody confusing, as well as the reason the "aspects" and their "guardians" are so often conflated.

Here's how I envision the element-aspect-guardian trios: 

First Quadrant = Spiritual Earth = Bhumi, watched over and aided by Prithvi

Second Quadrant = Spiritual Wind = Dhana, watched over and aided by Vayu

Third Quadrant = Spiritual Water = Dhyana, watched over and aided by Ishvara (Vishnu-Narayana) inside Ishana (Shiva-Nara)

Fourth Quadrant = Spiritual Fire = Gaja, watched over and aided by Agni

I'm just conjecturing at this point, but it makes more sense this way, IMHO.

I further suspect that the Dikpalas or Lokapalas (the guardians of the cardinal directions) and the Dvarapalas (the "door" protectors) might have gotten confused over the centuries. The Dikpalas are said to be Indra (east), Yama (south), Kubera (north), and Varuna (west), but it's pretty clear to me that these are the four powers guarding the doors between the quadrants. Kubera's a bit of an oddity, both because he's pretty obscure and because he's depicted as a pot-bellied dwarf riding a human being. And yet, he guards the door into the Golden Egg. If I had to guess, I'd say the two sets of "gods" are partners who, in actuality, are two different poles on the same scale. Indra, the Blood Ray, is the "realized" partner of Varuna, the Water Ray, while Kubera, the "god of wealth," represents the "realized" state of Yama, the divine spark.

Understood this way, their positions on the Wheel make sense. Yama guards the "door" into the first quadrant because we have to germinate the "seed of the True Vine" he represents in order to enter the Temple. Varuna guards the door into the second quadrant, because we have to hear the Om before we can begin that leg of the journey. Kubera guards the door into the third quadrant, because we have to reclaim our Holy Inheritance -- and overcome the ego -- before we can enter the Upper World. And Indra guards the door into the fourth quadrant because we have to remember the Truth of our Oneness of Being before we can fulfill our higher function in the Atonement Crusade. 


This little diagram shows the positions of the eight "guardian" powers on the Wheel. Apart from Nirriti in the Southwest, which makes no sense, it matches my model.

Nirriti's position as guardian of the Southwest confounds me -- unless he represents what the Soul must overcome in the first quadrant. But that wouldn't make him much of a guardian, would it? In Hinduism, Nirriti or Nirrita is the "god" of misery, suffering, poverty, disease, and death. So, it seems more logical that s/he would govern the Lower World -- the dark void of nothingness and chaos OUTSIDE the Temple of the Soul's Journey. And perhaps that's what the Southwest quadrant of the Wheel is presumed to represent in some schools of thought. That's not how I see it, but what do I know? Except that Prithvi makes much more sense as the guardian of the Southwest quadrant. She is, in fact, the "protector" of the whole shebang, as I'm about to explain.


Prithvi


An important goddess in Vedic Hinduism, Prithvi is presumed to be the archetypal "mother" of the Earth -- the Hindu equivalent of "Mother Earth," more or less. And rightly so, in many respects, but not for the reasons her worshippers think. In the literature, she is described as a nurturing, generous goddess who provides sustenance to all living beings on earth. This makes sense, as does her close association in the Rig Veda with Dyaus Pita, the Heavenly Father. In latter-day Hinduism, she has been supplanted by Bhumi, who is no more an "earth goddess" (in the usual sense) than is Prithvi. 

Prithvi may be known as "the Vast One," but that is not the meaning of her name. Her name is a compound of "pri" (love or beloved) and "thvi" (light), making her the Vedic personification not of Planet Earth, but of the Light of Love that sustains all divinely created life. Hence her close association with Dyaus Pita.

Let me take this opportunity to share one of my absolute favorite songs -- "In the Light of Love," performed as a duet by Deva Premal and Miten. If you've never heard it, you're in for a real treat.



Love is what we are, what God is, and what  sustains us, even in the dream, as Jesus explains in Workbook Lesson 50: I am sustained by the Love of God. In the Text, he uses the specific phrase "Light of Love" at least half a dozen times. In one place, he says:

Release from guilt as you would be released. ²There is no other way to look within and see the light of love, shining as steadily and as surely as God Himself has always loved His Son. AND AS HIS SON LOVES HIM. There is no fear in love, for love is guiltless. You who have always loved your Father can have no fear, for any reason, to look within and see your holiness. You cannot be as you believed you were. Your guilt is without reason because it is not in the Mind of God, where you are. And this is reason, which the Holy Spirit would restore to you. He would remove only illusions. All else He would have you see. And in Christ’s vision He would show you the perfect purity that is forever within God’s Son. (ACIM, T-13.X.10:1-11)


Keeping all that in mind, let's move on to the next verse -- Rv 1.9.6 -- which reads: sutatra codayendra raye rabhasvatah tuvidyumna yasasvatah sam gomad indra. 

The holy sound in that place (the Highest Heaven) stimulates the Majesty streaming the rays of light bringing forward the underlying Power and Glory of the eternal Word of God, the light illuminating Indra.

(Wilson's nonsensical and completely wrong-minded translation: Opulent Indra, encourage us in this rite for the acquirement of wealth, for we are diligent and renowned.)

My definitions:

sutatra (the holy sound there or in that place) coday-endra (stimulates the majesty) rāye (streaming) ra-bhas-va-taḥ (the rays of light bringing forward the underlying)| tuvi-dyumna (power and glory) ya-śasvataḥ (of the eternal) saṃ (Word of God) gomad (the ray of light illuminating) indra (Indra) 

My notes: 

In the Course, Jesus uses the particular phrase "power and glory" more than a dozen times. In one place in the Text, he says:

Power and glory belong to God alone. So do you. God gives whatever belongs to Him because He gives of Himself, and everything belongs to Him. Giving of yourself is the function He gave you. Fulfilling it perfectly will let you remember what you HAVE of Him, and by this you will remember also what you ARE in Him. You cannot be powerless to do this, because this is your power. Glory is God’s gift to you, because that is what He is. See this glory everywhere to remember what you are. (ACIM, T-8.III.8:1-8)


And guess what? The rishis tell us more or less the same thing in the next two lines. From here on, I'll dispense with Wilson's translations, because they really are utterly useless. Rv 1.9.7 reads: vajavad asme prthu sravo brhat visvayur dhehy aksitam, which translates as follows:

To strengthen that voice in us, Prithu sounds Brahspati (the Lord of the Song of Prayer), the vital power of universal wholeness to be meditated upon with the Spiritual Eye.

My definitions:

vājavad (to strengthen that voice) asme (in us) pṛthu (Prithu, [a rather mysterious incarnation of Vishnu]) śravo (sounds) bṛhat (shorthand for Brahspati, the Lord of the Song of Prayer) viśvāyur (the vital power of universal wholeness) dhehy (to be meditated upon) akṣi-tam (with the Spiritual Eye)

My notes:

Prithu is a bit of a curiosity, as he's believed to be an incarnation of Vishnu, even though he isn't listed among the standard ten. His name is a compound of "prith" (extending or spreading) and "u" (the Cosmic Vibration, Holy Word, or Holy Name). And that vibration, Word, or Name is, of course, Perfect Love. So Prithu is the disperser of Prithvi, the Light of Love, in the dream of earthly existence. 


Prithu chasing the goddess Prithvi, from an illustrated manuscript of the Bhagavata Purana Indian, Pahari, about 1740.


In the Puranic lore, Prithu is best known for chasing Prithvi in the form of a cow (as pictured above). Eventually, he catches her and persuades her to give up her "milk" to sustain the world's food supply and end the long-time famine. All metaphors, of course, for the sustenance Prithvi, the Light of Love, supplies to our dreaming Souls.

Our revised understanding of Prithvi's identity also clarifies what the cow and her milk truly represent in India. Most Indians sort-of get this, but generally view the cow (I believe) as a God-given provider of (mortal) life-sustaining milk, rather than as a symbol for the divine supplier of the (immortal) life-sustaining "milk" of God's Love and Grace.

In the Mahabharata epic and the Vishnu and Bhagavata puranas, Prithu is described as a "part-avatar" of Vishnu. Born "ayonija" (without the yoni), he is untouched by ego desires and can thus control his senses to "rule his kingdom" in accordance with Dharma. To be born "ayonija" is a symbolic reference having nothing to do with the female reproductive organs. Mystically speaking, The yoni symbolizes the upside-down triangle of Prakriti consciousness -- the unreal physical existence into which our reincarnating Souls are born to make the circle-journey. That upside-down triangle is, in fact, "the Wheel," which we must turn right-side up again to restore our memories of Divine Reality. When right-side-up, the triangle is the "Shiva Lingam" signifying Purusha or Christ consciousness.

I explained all this in earlier posts, but it bears repeating.

So, to say Prithu was born "ayonija" means he was born in Purusha consciousness -- and that's almost certainly what Jesus's "virgin birth" also signified. In fact, the more I learn about Prithu, the more I believe he is Jesus. And the reason he's described as a "part avatar" is that he has to "come again" -- within our hearts and minds -- before he becomes a full-fledged avatar. He is, in fact, Kalki, the tenth avatar of Vishnu who has yet to fully manifest on earth.


Kalki, the tenth avatar of Vishnu = "the second coming" of Christ

Allow me to present the evidence supporting my supposition that Prithu represents Jesus. First and foremost, Prithu was born the "first consecrated king" -- the King of Kings, in other words. On his right palm was the "mark" of Vishnu's Sudarshana -- the "chakra" representing the Spiritual Eye and the sixth plane of consciousness, where the eye is fully open. He was born with Christ's Vision, in other words. His birth was treated as a yajna -- a sacred offering from the Creator -- not a sacrifice! He was crowned immediately, after which "sutas" -- the royal heralds of the Om -- sang his glories.

Implored (at some point) by his subjects to end the famine on earth, he pursued Prithvi (who wasn't yet called Prithvi) in the form of a cow with his bow and arrows (his pinpointed "Samadhi" meditative focus). After cornering her, Prithu agreed to spare her in exchange for her "milk" -- the Light of Love he would "bring down to earth" to end the drought and increase the greater (spiritual) food supply.

He milked her using a calf representing Swayambhuva Manu -- the Hindu equivalent of Adam (the spark of the Red Ray that is the human Soul). In so doing, Prithu gave "life" to Love's Light and also became its "father" and "protector" in the world.

Before Prithu's reign, there was "no cultivation, no pasture, no agriculture, and no highway for merchants." There were no spiritual fruits to be gained by sharing thoughts or interests and no way out, in other words, because the shared Christ Mind channel was blocked until Jesus did his thing. And so, the Atonement Plan existed only in principle hitherto.

Pretty interesting, right? Even more interesting is that this teaching was recorded long before Jesus walked the earth -- but so were the Biblical prophecies of the coming Messiah. If I'm right about Prithu's identity, the verse under discussion could be read thusly:

To strengthen that voice in us, Jesus sounds the Om, the vital power of universal wholeness to be meditated upon with the Spiritual Eye.

And it is indeed Jesus -- or what he represents -- that sends down the Living Water to our Souls. Never forget that the dream is over and what we're living through is the recorded memory of what already happened on earth and in the material universe. So, the Rig Veda might have been "revealed" thousands of years before Jesus came in our bogus linear perception of time, but on the Holy Spirit's clock, he'd already "been there, done that" (so to speak) many eons earlier.

Am I blowing your mind? Good. I hope I blow it wide open -- and mine along with it.


Let's move on to our next Vedic verse (Rv 1.9.8), which reads: asme dhehi sravo brhad dyumnam sahasrasatamam indra ta rathinir isah. By my calculations, those words translate more or less as follows:

In us, to be contemplated, is the streaming Om extending the Power and Glory of the mighty essence of Wholeness -- Indra in the form of the charioteer driving Isha (the Supreme Lord or formless divine).
My definitions:

asme (In us) dhehi (to be contemplated) śrav-o (is the streaming Om) bṛhad (extending) dyumnaṃ (the Power and Glory) sahas-rasā-tamam (of the mighty essence of Wholeness) indra (Indra) tā (in the form of) rathin-īr (the charioteer driving) iṣaḥ (Isa, the Supreme Lord, formless divine, or universal Soul or Self)

My notes:

This may be a reference to Matali, the faithful, wise, and skillful servant who acts as Indra's charioteer in the legends; it may be a reference to Krishna, the charioteer who advises Arjuna (the spiritual warrior symbolizing the Soul), on the edge of the battlefield in the Bhagavad Gita; or it may be a reference to Aruna, the charioteer for Surya, the Hindu God representing the Spiritual Sun that is the Greater Light of God. And Aruna is, in fact, another form of the Red Ray. So my money's on Aruna, whose name, in fact, means "the first red ray of dawn." In the lore, Aruna is the son of Kashyapa, the father of the Vasu, and the brother of Garuda, the primary vahana of Lord Vishnu. (At another time, we'll explore what Garuda represents.) 


Vishnu and Garuda

 
Our second-to-last verse (Rv 1.9.9) reads: vasor indram vasupatim girbhir grnanta rgmiyam homa gantaram -- words that translate thusly:

Give forth the sound of Indra, the Lord of the Vasu and the Voice of Light. Seize the infinite praise-worthy offering to reach the place of rest and comfort.

My definitions:

va-sor (give forth the sound) indraṃ (of Indra) vasu-patiṃ (the Lord or "Husband" of the Vasu) gīrbhir (the Voice of Light) gṛṇanta (seize the infinite) ṛgmiyam (laudable or praise-worthy)| homa (offering) gantāram (to reach the place of rest, comfort, or the garden = the Holy Resting Place)

My notes:

At first I thought: "Uh-oh. This refutes my earlier statement that Indra can't be one of the Vasu." Then, I reminded myself that "pati" means "lord"  or "master" in the context of a husband's power over his wife, when and where wives are treated as servants and property. From this frame of reference, Indra being described herein as "Lord of the Vasu" makes perfect sense -- especially when we remember that Ezekiel described the four Living Beings he beheld as "wife-sisters." And our Souls -- not the Christian church -- are indeed the Brides of Christ preparing for the sacred marriage that is the "second coming" of the Bridegroom. So, Indra could definitely be "Lord of the Vasu" without being one of them per se.

In more general terms, this verse tells us that we must "give forth" the Om vibration to reach the Holy Resting Place -- the place where our Souls "find rest" in the dream. Jesus mentions this Holy Resting Place numerous times in the Course. My impression is that it's synonymous with the Holy Meeting Place, the Circle of Atonement, the Golden Circle, the Real World, and the Sacred Grass (just before the gates of Heaven). My impression also is that this "resting place" can be found in the fourth quadrant of the circle-journey, whose "gate" is guarded by King Indra, the Bridegroom of our Souls. Course-Jesus describes this "place" in halcyon terms in chapters 26 and 27 of the Text. In Chapter 29, he more succinctly says:

There is a place in you where this whole world has been forgotten; where no memory of sin and of illusion lingers still. There is a place in you which time has left, and echoes of eternity are heard. There is a resting place so still no sound except a hymn to Heaven rises up to gladden God the Father and the Son. Where Both abide are They remembered, Both. And where They are is Heaven and is peace. (ACIM, T-29.V.1:1-5)


The Sukta's tenth and final verse also concerns that "resting place." In Sanskrit, the line reads: utaye sutesute nyokase brhad brhata ed arih indraya susam arcati -- words that translate thusly:

To ascend to that sacred place, the eternal abode of the Great and Large, look upon the enemy in the Oneness of Indra, the Holy Word of God incarnate. 

My definitions: 

ūtaye (to ascend or rise up) sutesute (to that sacred place) nyokase (the eternal abode) bṛhad (of the Great) bṛhata (and Large) ed (look upon or perceive) ariḥ (the enemy) indrāya (in the oneness of Indra) śūṣam (the Holy Son/Word) arcati (of God incarnate)

My notes:

In Hinduism, "the Great and Large" refers to Brahman -- the Supreme and Absolute source, cause, or creator of the Divine Cosmos, which operates beyond the illusion of earthly existence, but is still present in all things, everywhere (and in which all things dwell eternally in omniscient Superconsciousness). So, God, basically -- but not as "personal" perhaps as the God worshipped in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.

In this profound final verse, the rishis tell us exactly what Jesus tells us: to remember our eternal dwelling place within the God Mind, we must look upon our "enemies" as one with us in Indra, the Red Ray seated upon the Throne of God on the seventh plane of consciousness. We must, in other words, perceive everyone (and ourselves) as the Word of God incarnate.

Course-Jesus says the exact same thing in many different ways, over and over. He also says, in as many ways, that it is through forgiveness that we arrive at this heightened perception of the oneness of being. But through True Forgiveness -- which sees through the illusion to the Truth -- rather than the sort of forgiveness the Ego Mind would have us practice. If we see the stain of sin, fault, or separation anywhere, we have not yet TRULY forgiven our Self for believing the dream.

I'm going to close today's discussion by sharing the whole of Workbook Lesson 283: My True Identity abides in You, which expresses these ideas both beautifully and succinctly. The lesson starts with a prayer:

Father, I made an image of myself, and it is this I call the Son of God. Yet is creation as it always was, for Your creation is unchangeable. Let me not worship idols. I am he my Father loves. My holiness remains the light of Heaven and the Love of God. Is not what is beloved of You secure? Is not the light of Heaven infinite? Is not Your Son my true Identity, when You created everything that is?

To which Jesus adds:

Now are we one in shared Identity, with God our Father as our only Source, and everything created part of us. And so we offer blessing to all things, uniting lovingly with all the world, which our forgiveness has made one with us.

(ACIM, W-283.1:1–2:2