Showing posts with label the holy relationship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the holy relationship. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

The Rig Veda's Tenth Sukta: Shiva, Hari, Garuda, Kamadeva & the Holy Relationship



We now come to the Rig Veda's tenth Sukta, which felt like a milestone -- until I remembered how many more lay ahead. Yikes. Will I finish the job before I drop my body? Will I even get through the first Mandala? Only time will tell -- and best to leave the future in God's hands, I daresay.

Historically, this Sukta has been characterized as a song of praise addressed to King Indra, who we now know to be the Red Ray or Blood Ray -- the Logos or Word of God, more or less, whose "sparks" are our individual Souls (Adam or Atman). Like the nine Riks previously translated and interpreted, Rv 1.10 is a wisdom teaching rather than a hymn or poem. Poetic in its use of language in places, to be sure, but narrative in structure rather than metered. King Indra is indeed discussed throughout, but mentioned as well are Vishnu, Shiva, Krishna (possibly), Brahma, Kamadeva, the Vasu, and Anu (among others). The main subject is, however, the Om/Aum vibration and the critical role it plays in the illusion-destroying and reality-restoring processes leading to Moksha.

So, let's get to it without further ado. Consistent with Max Muller's formatting, the Rik's first verse reads as follows in transliterated Sanskrit: gayanti tva gayatrino 'rcanty arkam arkinah brahmanas tva satakrata ud vamsam iva yemire.

My translation:

The sacred-syllable drives the Self to acquire the stillness of God-incarnate, the ray of light illuminating the higher thoughts of the Self, the true thoughts of God up above the descendants seemingly in the waters of sin.

My syllable breaks and definitions:

gā-yanti (the sacred-syllable drives) tvā (the Self) gāya-triṇo (to acquire the stillness) '(a)rcanty (of God-incarnate) arkam (the ray of light) arkiṇaḥ (illuminating) brah-māṇas (the higher thoughts) tvā (of the Self) śatakrata (the True Thought of God that is Indra, the Logos) ud (up above) vaṃśam (the descendants or lineage) iva (seemingly in)
The next line (Rv 1.10.2) reads: yat sanoh sanum aruhad bhury aspasta kartvam tad indro artham cetati vuthena vrsnir ejati.

My translation:

Strive to rise level by level astride the Mighty Horse stabilizing the Great Purusha's cycles of the universe, which drive the selfless purpose of the mind to connect the sparks of the rays born of Vishnu, the Holy One.
My divisions and definitions:

yat ( strive or endeavor) sānoḥ (to rise) sānum (level by level) āruhad (astride) bhūry (the mighty) aspa-ṣṭa (horse stabilizing) ka-rtvam (the Great Purusha's cycles) tad (of the universe) in-dro (driving the selfless) arthaṃ (purpose) cetati (of the mind) yū-thena (to connect the sparks) vṛṣṇir (of the rays) e-jati (born of Vishnu, the Holy One)

My notes:

The Sanskrit word "aspa" or "asva" means "horse," rather than "horses," so the rishis probably don't mean the four horses seen by the Biblical prophets. The horse referenced is almost certainly Uchaihshravas, the seven-headed flying equine that emerged from the churning of the Ocean of Milk. According to the lore, King Indra seized the horse as it rose and claimed it as his vehicle.
Wikipedia and other sources tell us the name Uchaihshravas means "long ears" or "neighing aloud," neither of which reveals anything about what the horse represents allegorically. Not sure how they came up with those definitions, because the name is, in actuality, a three-way compound of "uch" (to end), "chaih" (dividing) and "shravas" (the glory of the All). So, Uchaihshravas represents the Atonement (in principle), which King Indra, the Logos, claimed as his "vehicle" after the Holy Spirit changed the purpose of the dream. And that change of purpose, which took place in and remains encapsulated in the Holy Instant, is what the Samudra Manthana fable is really about.
Uchchaihshravas, as depicted in Hindu iconography. Do his ears look long to you?

When the Holy Spirit changed the world's purpose (from insane and chaotic miscreating in conflict to restoring divine order, sanity, and peace), he allowed us to choose between the two worlds (for a time), to preserve our God-given free-will. And, as Course-Jesus explains:

It is still up to you to choose to join with truth or with illusion. But remember that to choose one is to let the other go. Which one you choose you will endow with beauty and reality, because the choice depends on which you value more. The spark of beauty or the veil of ugliness, the real world or the world of guilt and fear, truth or illusion, freedom or slavery—it is all the same. For you can never choose except between God and the ego. Thought systems are but true or false, and all their attributes come simply from what they are. Only the Thoughts of God are true. And all that follows from them comes from what they are, and is as true as is the holy Source from which they came.

My holy brother, I would enter into all your relationships, and step between you and your fantasies. Let my relationship to you be real to you, and let me bring reality to your perception of your brothers. They were not created to enable you to hurt yourself through them. They were created to create with you. This is the truth that I would interpose between you and your goal of madness. Be not separate from me, and let not the holy purpose of Atonement be lost to you in dreams of vengeance. Relationships in which such dreams are cherished have excluded me. Let me enter in the Name of God and bring you peace, that you may offer peace to me.

(ACIM, T-17.III.9:1–10:8)

And just so we're on the same page, the Holy Relationship Jesus discusses above and at length in the Course is indeed "the selfless purpose of the mind to connect the sparks of the rays born of Vishnu, the Holy One." So, once again, the Rig Veda and the Course are simpatico, which is as it should be, since both were, of course, divinely revealed by the same Source. And the Holy Spirit's teachings are always consistent in content, even if they differ in form.

If it helps cement the concept, think of the Holy Relationship as a pearl necklace. Our Souls are the pearls, Vishnu is the string running through the pearls to hold them together, and Shiva is the box protecting the necklace.

Let's move on to the Rik's third line, which describes the Holy Relationship in more detail. In transliterated Sanskrit, the line should read: yuksva hi kesina hari vrsana kaksyapra athana Indra somapa giram upasrutim cara. Not how Max Muller structured the line, but the only way it both makes sense and communicates Higher Truth.

My translation:

Join as Souls to stimulate the Lion of God, Hari, the power of grace encircling and advancing the reach of King Indra's Living Water, the voice from above heard to obtain knowledge of God.

My divisions and definitions:

yukṣvā (join as Souls) hi (to stimulate) keśin-ā (the Lion of God), harī (Hari) vṛṣ-aṇā (the power of grace) kakṣya-prā (encircling and advancing) athānah (the reach of) Indra (Indra's) som-apā (life water or living water) girām (the voice from) upa-śrutiṃ (above heard ) car-a (to obtain knowledge of God)

My notes:

Herein we learn that "Hari" is the Lion of God, as well as the power of grace extending the reach of the Living Water generated by King Indra, the Word of God. Technically, the Sanskrit word "kesin" means "long hair," but the word also is used to describe lions and horses, because of their manes.

I went with "lion" instead of "long hair" or "horse" for several reasons. The first is that God's strength, power, and authority are compared to a lion's roar or growl -- metaphors for the Om vibration -- several places in the Bible. The second is that Ezekiel saw a lion on the right-hand or eastern side of the circle in his vision of the four Living Beings. The third is that, in the Kabbalah, the archangel Uriel is described as the Lion of God, and Uriel -- the archangel of the Atonement -- is (as discussed many posts ago) the black-ram "vahana" or "vehicle" of Agni, the Fire of God. Uriel is, in fact, both the gentle Lamb of God and the powerful Lion of God, which "lie down together" to bring about our deliverance.

Or, to quote Course-Jesus:

The lion and the lamb lying down together symbolize that strength and innocence are not in conflict, but naturally live in peace. “Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God” is another way of saying the same thing. A pure mind knows the truth and this is its strength. It does not confuse destruction with innocence because it associates innocence with strength, not with weakness. (ACIM, T-3.I.5:3-6)

In Hinduism, "Hari" is primarily used to describe Lord Vishnu, the Vishwapurusha aspect of the Holy Spirit of Grace. The word means "one who takes away (sin)" or "the remover of obstacles (to enlightenment)," making Lord Vishnu the deific figure in Hinduism equivalent to Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God.

On the subject of the symbolic Lamb, Course-Jesus says:

I have been correctly referred to as “the lamb of God who taketh away the sins of the world,” but those who represent the lamb as blood-stained do not understand the meaning of the symbol. Correctly understood, it is a very simple symbol that speaks of my innocence. (ACIM, T-3.I.5:1-2)

Like I said several posts back, Jesus and Vishnu both represent the Vishwapurusha "aspect" of the Christ Mind striving to awaken its dreaming parts. In the Biblical Book of Revelations, Jesus also is called "the Lion of Judah," meaning that, like Vishnu, he represents the power of Hari on the right-hand or eastern side of the Wheel of the circle-journey. Ergo, Jesus and Vishnu both symbolize the Lion and the Lamb -- God's strength and innocence working in tandem to wake us up. 
As most non-Hindus are aware (thanks to the Hare Krishna movement), the term "Hari" (in its "vocative form" of "Hare") is used to address and/or invoke Lord Vishnu's seventh and eighth "avatars" or "incarnations" (Rama and Krishna, respectively). Both are praised repeatedly in what is known as the Maha or Great Mantra. Chanting the mantra is said to destroy the inauspiciousness of the Kali age, help control the mind, and reveal spiritual reality.

The sixteen-word Vaishnava mantra first appeared in the Kali-Santarana Upanishad, which was scribed sometime prior to 1500 CE. In the 15th century, it rose to importance in the Bhakti movement founded by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. Wikipedia tells us the mantra is composed of three Sanskrit names: Krishna, Rama, and Hare. But Hare isn't technically a name; it's (as I said) the "vocative" form of Hari; meaning it's how the personified forms of Hari are addressed or invoked. If, for example, Hari meant "lord," Hare would be akin to "your lordship." (That's how I see it, anyway.)

But wait, there's more ... because Lord Vishnu's fourth avatar is Narasimha -- the "man-lion" who killed Hiranyakashipu, ending religious persecution and calamity on earth and restoring Dharma. What Narasimha represents is pretty obvious when we apprehend that 1) Hiranyakashipu means "the desire for material wealth and comforts" and 2) "Nara" refers to the Purusha -- the Nataraja aspect of Shiva "dancing" underneath the illusion to move God's Plan forward. So "Narasimha" more accurately and meaningfully translates as the Atonement Lion or the Lion of those seeking Atonement through Christ (the meaning of "Judah" in scriptural code) than as "man-lion."

As I read the symbols, Narasimha represents the strength of God, which gradually restores the Soul's spiritual sight. And that strength takes the form of the Om vibration, which we begin to hear very faintly in the first quadrant of the circle-journey -- the quadrant of Dharma. Hearing the sound, which dissolves the desire for material wealth and comforts -- the valueless things of the world, in Course terms -- purifies us enough to cross the threshold into the second quadrant of "Artha." Since my post on the circle-journey, I've learned that "Artha" means "purpose" rather than "wealth," which makes a whole lot more sense. Why? Because the second quadrant is where we begin to fulfill our holy purpose in the Circle of Forgiveness, by giving and receiving the Living Water that washes away the perceptions of sin and its ensuing guilt and karmic debts.

Here we see Narashima-Lakshmi, one of five personas Vishnu's fourth avatar assumes in Hindu iconography. As Narashima-Lakshmi, he isn't a form of Lakshmi, he's her partner (in her green-clad Bhumi "aspect") in the first quadrant of the circle-journey. 

Let's proceed to the next verse (Rv 1.10.4), which reads: ehi stomam abhi svarabhi grnihy a ruva brahma cano vaso sacendra yajnam ca vardhaya uktham indraya samsyam vardhanam purunisidhe sakro. (At this point, Max Muller's "chanda-chariot" loses its wheels, so to speak, because his imposed line-breaks no longer hold sway.)

My translation:

Lord Vishnu stimulates the chorus praising the Red Ray, the Highest Self sending forth the Light of God to obstruct Brahma (the Ego Mind) to enable dwelling together in the Majesty bestowing the knowledge connecting the divided quarters mentioned (in previous Suktas); Indra's four parts to be completed by choosing the wealth of Heaven unhindering the fullness of the Rays.

My divisions and definitions:

stomām̐ (the chorus praising) abhi (the Red Ray) svarāb-hi (the highest self sending forth) gṛṇīhy = grinihi (the light) ā (of God) ruva = ruya (to obstruct) brahma (the Ego Mind, "the creator" of material unreality) cano (to enable) vaso (dwelling) sac-endra (together in the Majesty) ya-jñaṃ (bestowing the knowledge) ca (connecting) vardh-aya (the divided quarters) uktham (mentioned previously) indrāya (Indra's four) śaṃsyaṃ (parts to be completed) var-dhanam (by choosing the wealth of) puru-niṣidhe (Heaven unhindering) śak(a)ro (the fullness of the rays)

My notes:

"Ehi," the word starting this verse, is widely believed to mean "come" or "come near" -- in the sense of a command or entreaty. That may be so in some cases, but those definitions don't work here. Dividing the word as "e" and "hi," on the other hand, not only works, but also affirms many things just explained about Vishnu and Hari. In case I failed to say this earlier, the stand-alone letter "E" designates Vishnu, the Holy One or Holy Spirit, in Vedic shorthand.

What's particularly noteworthy here is that the rishis use the name Brahma for the Ego Mind. I can't be wrong about this, given the context. I mean, what else could the Light of God "obstruct" to enable us to dwell together in the Majesty the Ego Mind hides from our awareness?

In the Course, Jesus never mentions the four Living Beings. He does, however, use the specific term "Majesty" in a similar capacity at least eight times. In one place, he says:

When a mind has only light, it knows only light. Its own radiance shines all around it, and extends out into the darkness of other minds, transforming them into Majesty. The Majesty of God is there, for you to recognize and appreciate and know. Recognizing the Majesty of God in your brother is to accept your own inheritance. God gives only equally. If you recognize His gift in anyone, you have acknowledged what He has given you. Nothing is so easy to recognize as truth. This is the recognition that is immediate, clear and natural. You have trained yourself not to recognize it, and this has been very difficult for you. (ACIM, T-7.XI.5:1-9)

Course-Jesus may not mention the Living Beings, but in another section of the Text, he uses words almost identical to those found in this verse. To demonstrate what I mean, I've underlined the relevant phrasing in the citation below:

This tiny spot of sin that stands between you and your brother still is holding back the happy opening of Heaven’s gate. How little is the hindrance that withholds the wealth of Heaven from you. And how great will be the joy in Heaven when you join the mighty chorus to the Love of God! (ACIM, T-26.IV.6:1-3)

The Sukta's next verse also deviates radically from Max Muller's inflicted metric structure. To make sense and communicate truth, Rv 1.10.5 should read: yatha sutesu no raranat sakhyesu ca tam it imahe tam raye tam suvirye sa sakra uta nah sakat indro vasu dayamanah.

My translation:

In accord with the charioteer of Holy Vishnu streaming the radiant sound, the Holy Relationship connects the Soul-selves in brotherhood to ask the One Self streaming in four parts -- the holy and heroic Word of God, the Mighty One protecting the whole wheeled vehicle driving the selfless Vasu -- to grant Yama wholeness.

My divisions and definitions:

yathā (in accordance with) sut-eṣu (the charioteer of "esu" = Holy Vishnu) ṇo (streaming) rā-raṇat (the radiant sound) sakhye-ṣu (the Holy Relationship) ca (connects) tam (the one Self) it (in) sakhitva (brotherhood) īmahe (to request or ask) taṃ (the one Self) rāye (streaming) taṃ (in four parts) suvīrye (the holy and heroic) sa (word of god) śakra (the Mighty One) uta (speaking for) naḥ (the whole) śakat (wheeled vehicle) indro (driving the selfless) vasu (Vasu) da-yamā-naḥ (to grant Yama wholeness)

My notes:

The meaning of "sutesu" eluded me for quite some time. I tried dividing it every possible way, but nothing seemed right until I discovered that "sut" means "charioteer," while "Esu" can mean Jesus Christ. And, as we've established, Jesus Christ and Vishnu are two symbolic forms of the Vishwapurusha. Furthermore, "E" is Vedic shorthand for Vishnu, so "E-su" can only mean "Holy Vishnu."

Okay, so ... if Esu is Vishnu, who is his charioteer?

At first, I thought it might be Krishna, the charioteer in the Bhavagad Gita. But all the sources I consulted identified Vishnu's charioteer as Garuda, Hari's divine golden-eagle "vahana." And that makes a lot of sense, especially since Lakshmi is often depicted "riding along" with Vishnu on Garuda in Hindu iconography. 

Vishnu and Lakshmi astride Garuda.
What does Garuda represent in the vast and complex Hindu pantheon? Once again, the name provides the answer. Garuda is a compound of "ga" (the sacred-syllable, Om) and "ruda" (crying or weeping). So, the name means either "the Om weeping" or "the cry of the Om." Either way, our friend Garuda personifies the Living Water that is indeed Lord Vishnu's "vehicle" or "charioteer" in the dream-realm.

In the Mahabharata epic, which tells the story of Garuda's birth, the gold-winged eagle-man is identified as the younger brother of Aruna, the charioteer of Surya-dev, the Sun God. And Aruna, as we've established, is another form of the Red Ray, which "drives" or "carries" the Sun (Son) of God -- the Greater Light of the connected God and Christ Minds -- in the dream-realm. So, the Living Water is the "little brother" of the Red Ray.

From the Mahabharata epic, we also learn that Garuda’s mother, Vinata, was tricked into becoming the slave of her sister, Kadru, the mother of the nagas -- the snakes associated with Shiva. Kudra means "the Great Purusha's pole-star," while Vinata means "the dance of duality" or "the dance of separation." So, Kadru -- the "star" of God's Thought at the top of the dream -- "tricked" the dream-world into becoming her slave. And to free the dream-world from her clutches, Garuda (the Living Water) had to give the nagas a taste of Amrita -- the Blood Ray. Garuda performed that feat, thereby giving the snakes the ability to slough off their old skins (i.e., the ability to make the free-will choice to remain asleep in "the dance of duality" or to wake-up and remember the star).

And, as Course-Jesus explains in no-uncertain terms, "The Holy Spirit and the ego are the only choices open to you. God created one, and so you cannot eradicate it. You made the other, and so you can." (ACIM, T-5.V.6:8-10)

Seen in this light, the story of Garuda's birth is really about how the Holy Spirit 1) changed the world's purpose, 2) put the spark of the Red Ray in us to encourage and enable the choice to awaken, 3) generated the sin-dissolving Om, and 4) preserved our free-will.

Now that we better understand what Garuda represents, let's explore what this verse communicates on the whole. It is Garuda, the Living Water, who radiates the sound that connects our Soul-selves in Holy Relationship "to ask the One Self streaming in four parts ... to grant Yama wholeness."

The One Self streaming in four parts is King Indra, the Red Ray, Logos, and/or Word of God. When we chose the Ego Mind over God, we kicked King Indra off his throne by denying our True Identity as God's One Son. To return to his rightful place, Indra broke into quarters to "walk" the circle-journey back to the "throne room" on the Seventh Plane. Those quarters are "the selfless Vasu" -- the four aspects of Lakshmi embodying the quadrants. By joining in the brotherhood of the Holy Relationship, our Soul-selves move "the wheeled-vehicle" -- the Wheel of Life on which the circle-journey takes place -- forward in time. And only by returning King Indra to his throne can we grant Yama wholeness; Yama, the spark of the Red Ray and "seed of the True Vine" in all Living Beings (NOT the god of death).

Now, compare all I've just explained to what Course-Jesus says below:

The Thought of God surrounds your little kingdom, waiting at the barrier you built to come inside and shine upon the barren ground. See how life springs up everywhere! The desert becomes a garden, green and deep and quiet, offering rest to those who lost their way and wander in the dust. Give them a place of refuge, prepared by love for them where once a desert was. And everyone you welcome will bring love with him from Heaven for you. They enter one by one into this holy place, but they will not depart as they had come, alone. The love they brought with them will stay with them, as it will stay with you. And under its beneficence your little garden will expand, and reach out to everyone who thirsts for Living Water, but has grown too weary to go on alone. (ACIM, T-18.VIII.9:1-8)

Before we move on, I want to say two quick things. The first is that the Living Being with "the likeness of an eagle" in the Book of Revelations has to be related to Garuda. I'll have to go back and check, but I believe the eagle-like Living Being was Dhana, the Lakshmi aspect of the second quadrant, wherein we give and receive the Living Water to heal each other in the Circle of Forgiveness. So, that association makes sense.

The second thing I want to point out is that the Bhavacakra or Wheel of Life in Buddhism is held by Yama, the presumed "god of death." And that's why he looks like a demon. Unfortunately, that misconception of Yama has far-reaching tentacles. A central figure in Buddhist mythology, Yama also is (erroneously) perceived as the god of death by Buddhists in China, Tibet, and Japan. More accurately, Yama is the "marker" our Souls move around the circle-journey. How far we moved that "marker" forward or backward in each incarnation determines where we start the journey in the next one. And that is, I believe, why Yama is perceived as both "the god of death" and "the judge" of where Souls go after death.

The Buddhist Bhavacakra, held by a demonic-looking Yama.

With the new formatting, Rv 1.10.6 now reads: suvivrtam sunirajam indra tvadatam id vasah gavam apa vrajam vrdhi krnusva radho.

My translation:

Holiness made manifest, holiness without impurity, Indra is the one who gives to you the supreme Power and Glory of the Om-dispensing water-cistern (Shiva) to build interest in self-creating through loving kindness and devotion.

My word divisions and definitions:

su-vivṛtaṃ (holiness made manifest) su-nirajam (holiness without impurities) indra (Indra) tvādātam (is the one who gives to you) id (the supreme power) yaśaḥ (and glory) ga-vām (of the Om-dispensing -- NOT "belonging to the cows") apa (water) vrajaṃ (cistern) vṛdhi (to build interest in) kṛṇu-ṣva (self-creating) rādho (through loving kindness and devotion)

My notes:

As I understand things, the Om-dispensing water cistern also is the wellspring, the Golden Egg, the Spiritual Moon, and the water-palanquin of Vishnu-Narayana-Ishvara -- all of which are Shiva, the "mouth" through which King Indra calls us to remember the Oneness we share with each other and God (in the everlasting Covenant of Love).

Shiva is, therefore, the Holy Spirit. But so are Vishnu and Indra. And this is one reason I prefer Hinduism and its complex pantheon of deities, confusing though they are, to Christianity's overly simplified and altogether erroneous Holy Trinity. Rightmindedly perceived, the Holy Spirit of Grace is the ONLY Holy Power operating inside the Temple of our dreaming minds. S/he simply takes different forms or performs various functions to "unhinder" or "unobstruct" the channel through which God communicates with His Creations -- the channel we blocked when we chose the Ego Mind (Brahma) as our co-creator over God (Brahman).

Or, to quote Course-Jesus:

Perception did not exist until the separation introduced degrees, aspects and intervals. Spirit has no levels, and all conflict arises from the concept of levels. Only the Levels of the Trinity are capable of unity. The levels created by the separation cannot but conflict. This is because they are meaningless to each other.
Still operating in the lower levels of perception, we can't really grasp what he means by this. Neither can we know if he's speaking of the Holy Trinity in Heaven proper (God, the Father, Cause, or Creator; Christ; the Son, Effect, or Created; and Agape, the Creative Force binding the two together in the Covenant of Perfect Creation) or the Atonement Trinity working together in the dream to wake us up (the Red Ray, the Water Ray, and the "forgiveness vehicle" through which they move and operate within the Temple).
One way we might view the second or Lesser-Light Trinity working in three-in-one unity is this:

Indra, the Red Ray = the Word of God
Shiva, the Atonement or Forgiveness "vehicle" = the Mouth of God
Vishnu, the Water Ray = the Voice of God

Vishnu (the Water Ray) speaks of and for Indra (the Blood Ray) through Shiva (the already accomplished Atonement Plan playing out in the dream of time).

In Hinduism, Shiva and Vishnu are correctly perceived as two complementary, harmonious, and inseparable aspects of the same cosmic function -- the function of freeing our Souls from the Wheel of Karma and/or Rebirth through love and forgiveness. Yes, the two deific powers are joined at the hip, so to speak, but they still play unique roles in the Atonement process.

Shiva is the cistern, while Vishnu is the water pouring out of the cistern. Shiva is the water-palanquin, while Vishnu is the passenger he carries and protects (along with Lakshmi) in the dark waters of ego thought; Shiva is the Golden Egg, while Vishnu is the embryo growing and evolving within its protective shell; Shiva is the Moon, while Vishnu is the moonbeams shining down on the world; Shiva is the chalice, while Vishnu is the wine within the cup we must drink and absorb to remember the Truth of our Being; Shiva is the toolbox, while Vishnu embodies the tools; Shiva is the passive or inert aspect of the Atonement, while Vishnu is his hard-working Om-budsman (pun intended).

Vishnu, displaying the tools of Atonement he both provides and embodies.

After writing some of this yesterday, I had dinner and watched a little television with my husband before retiring for the evening. About 2:30 a.m., I awoke and decided to meditate on the Living Water. As I silently chanted "Om Hari Om," questions about Shiva and Vishnu danced through my mind. What is their true relationship to each other? What are they really? I prayed for clarity. And then, I saw -- or simply knew. Shiva is the all-powerful Ark of the Covenant that destroys the ILLUSION of enmity, conflict, and separation. And that is why the Ark was believed to destroy armies if and when it led the way into battle. There are no enemies forgiveness can't destroy because all our perceived enemies are figments of the distorted perception True Forgiveness corrects.

God would not have His Son embattled, and so His Son’s imagined “enemy” is totally unreal. You are but trying to escape a bitter war from which you HAVE escaped. The war is gone. For you have heard the hymn of freedom rising unto Heaven. Gladness and joy belong to God for your release, because you made it not. Yet as you made not freedom, so you made not a war that could endanger freedom. Nothing destructive ever was or will be. The war, the guilt, the past are gone as one into the unreality from which they came. (ACIM, T-13.XI.2:1-8)

The Ark of the Covenant is Shiva, the transformational "vehicle" of True Forgiveness, which is the miracle or rightminded perception.

And that explains why Shiva is called "the destroyer" in Hinduism. Rightly understood, Shiva destroys the false perceptions of enmity and conflict chaining us to the Wheel of Karma.

Vishnu, meanwhile, dwells within the Shiva-Ark with our Souls to preserve the Covenant of Love that is the Holy Relationship. And that is the true reason he is called "the preserver." Hari preserves the "covenant" of the shared Higher Mind, NOT the false creations of Brahma.

To destroy the truth-blocking Ego Mind we have to join in Holy Relationship in the Circle of Forgiveness. And that Holy Circle also is Shiva, the "vehicle" through which True Forgiveness is achieved. Course-Jesus discusses that "ark" at length in two places in the Text, under the headings "Entering the Ark" and "The Ark of Safety." I urge you to read both sections carefully.

This symbiotic relationship between Shiva and Vishnu makes clear why their various personas are so often linked in the Hindu lore: As Hari-Hara, Nara-Narayana, and Ishana-Ishvara, to name a few. I'm sure there are more examples, but those are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head.

Keeping in mind that Indra, Shiva, and Vishnu are three interwoven "aspects" of the Holy Spirit of God's Grace, let's read a passage from the Course wherein Jesus explains the Holy Spirit's genesis and function. As a teaching aid, I've added the Hindu names representing each "aspect" in brackets.

The Holy Spirit is the Christ Mind [Indra] which is aware of the knowledge that lies beyond perception. He came into being with the separation as a protection, inspiring the atonement principle [Shiva] at the same time. Before that there was no need for healing, for no one was comfortless. The Voice of the Holy Spirit [Vishnu] is the Call to Atonement, or the restoration of the integrity of the mind. When the Atonement is complete and the whole Sonship is healed, there will be no Call to Return. But what God creates is eternal. The Holy Spirit will remain with the Sons of God, to bless their creations and keep them in the Light of Joy. (ACIM, T-5.I.5:1-7)

Here's my take on what he says: Indra, the Christ Mind's representative in the dream-realm, "came into being with the separation as a protection" (of Creation's wholeness or oneness). Indra, the Blood Ray, didn't, therefore, exist before the separation. But God's Word (the thought God extended to create the Sonship) certainly did. So the Blood Ray embodies and protects the Word of God in the dream, but isn't the original Word of God (which is still in Heaven). He's the embodiment of Grace, in other words, the gentler restorative aspect of Agape.

At the same time Indra came into being, he inspired the Atonement principle of forgiveness (Shiva). And it is that aspect that sounds the Call to Awaken (Vishnu). Before all this happened, there was no Holy Spirit in Heaven. Ergo, the Holy Spirit isn't part of the True Trinity. But, having been created by God, the Spirit of Grace will continue to exist even after the separation ends -- to guide our joint creative endeavors and ensure the mad idea of self-creating (apart from God) never infects the Sonship again. And that's how we know the nightmare won't happen again or keep repeating "to endlessly evolve the universe," as some spiritual teachers ignorantly profess.

The Rik's next line, Rv 1.10.7, now reads: adrivah nah itva rodasi ubhe rghayamanam invatah jesah svaratir apah sam ga.

My translation:

To manifest Kamadeva (the Love of God) bearing the whole state of being -- Heaven and Earth, together in unified oneness -- cultivate the deep inner-peace bringing forward the now-moment to open the mouth of God, the celestial vessel producing the Living Water of God's Word, the sacred-syllable, Om.

My word divisions and definitions:

adr-ivaḥ (to manifest "i-vah" = kamadeva -- the love of God, rather than the god of love -- bearing or conveying) nah-itvā, rather than nahi-tva (the whole state of being) rodasī (Heaven and earth) ubhe (together) ṛghāy-amāṇam (cultivate the deep inner-peace) inv-ataḥ (bringing forward the now-moment) jeṣaḥ (to open the mouth of God) svarvat-īr (the celestial vessel producing) apaḥ (the Living Water) saṃ (of the Word of God) gā (the Sacred Syllable, Om)
My notes:

This verse not only affirms everything I just explained, it also clarifies how the system works. To manifest the Perfect Love holding Creation together as a whole, we need to cultivate the deep inner peace the Blood Ray (Indra) embodies. Course-Jesus tells us the same thing -- often and emphatically. And it just so happens that today, my workbook lesson is a review of Lesson 185: I want the peace of God.
In the review, Jesus gives us a prayer to recite, which pretty much says it all:

The peace of God is everything I want. The peace of God is my one goal; the aim of all my living here, the end I seek, my purpose and my function and my life, while I abide where I am not at home.

What this Vedic verse also explains is that to cultivate that deep inner-peace, we must open the mouth of God in the now-moment or Holy Instant (in Course terms) to receive the Living Water of God's Word -- the sacred-syllable, Om. So, Shiva (the Mouth), releases Vishnu (the Voice), which is produced by Indra (the Word). And the Word is Om. So, Indra is the Om, which "trickles down" to us, so to speak, through Shiva and Vishnu.

To translate this verse correctly, I had to know a couple of key things. The first is that "I" is the Vedic cypher for Kamadeva; and the second is that Kamadeva represents the Love of God (rather than the god of love) in the original teachings of Hinduism.

Like Agni and so many other Hindu gods, what Kamadeva truly personifies reversed when we projected the idea of Perfect Love out of our minds into the world we made to feel "special." And just as we blocked the Fire of God's Presence (Agni) with the projection of elemental fire, we blocked God's all-encompassing, all-inclusive, and equally-bestowed Perfect or Divine Love with our futile outward-focused search for what Course-Jesus calls "special love."

As he eloquently explains at one point:

You cannot love parts of reality and understand what love means. If you would love unlike to God, Who knows no special love, how can you understand it? To believe that SPECIAL relationships, with SPECIAL love, can offer you salvation is the belief that separation is salvation. For it is the complete equality of the Atonement in which salvation lies. How can you decide that special aspects of the Sonship can give you more than others? The past has taught you this. Yet the Holy Instant teaches you it is not so. (ACIM, T-15.V.3:1-7

The erroneous belief that Kamadeva represents "erotic love, pleasure, and desire" and is, therefore, the Hindu equivalent of Cupid is alarmingly ubiquitous. Google tells us this; Wikipedia tells us this; the Wisdom Library tells us this; Sacred Texts tells us this; and so does pretty much everything else on the Internet, of Hindu origin or otherwise. What, then, makes me so sure they've all got it wrong?

Kamadeva carrying the four aspects of Lakshmi aboard a time-eating peacock.

The name "Kamadeva," for starters. I'm convinced that "kam" means not desire or lust, but "love." Add the "a" at the end to make "kama" and you've got "Love of God," plus "deva" -- a word meaning "exalted being" or "heavenly being." So, the name "Kamadeva" literally translates as "the Love of God as exalted being." The word "kama" also can be divided as "ka" (the Great Purusha) and "ma" (producing or creating). Either way, lust never enters the picture.

In the Hindu lore, Kamadeva also is assigned three other names: Manmatha, Madana, and Anaga. Look them up and you'll (unhelpfully) find them defined as "love," "the Indian Cupid," or "the god of love." You might further (misleadingly) learn that "Manmatha" means "that which agitates the mind," which can certainly be said of "special love." But Manmatha -- a marriage of "man(a)" and "matha" -- actually means "the Mind of the Temple of Learning." And the Temple of Learning is the Spiritual Body. Likewise, Madana means not "love," but "producing selfless giving," while "Anaga" means "faultless," "without sin," or "pure."

Need I say more?

Kamadeva and Rati on their green-parrot vahana, Suka.

Well, yes ... I suppose I must, because Kamadeva's consort, constant companion, and fellow teacher is Rati, who (like Mary Magdalene, the wife of Jesus) has been painted as a whore by the slanderous Ego Mind and its agents. And someone needs to defend the poor devi's honor. Google "Rati," and you'll find her described as "the Hindu goddess of love, carnal desire, lust, passion, and sexual pleasure," when nothing could be farther from the truth.

Contrary to what Wikipedia reports, the name Rati is a marriage of "ra" (that which is radiant within) and "ti" (three). So, what Rati actually represents are the three "radiances" or "rays" emanating from, but still firmly attached to, God's Love within the Temple of Learning. Those three rays are Peace (Indra), Joy (Vishnu), and Forgiveness (Shiva) -- the latter of which is the closest we can come to Divine Love in the dream, according to Course-Jesus. And that is why Rati and Kamadeva are correctly characterized in the Hindu literature as "inseparable companions" and "co-teachers."

Far from being "the Hindu goddess of love, carnal desire, lust, passion, and sexual pleasure," Rati represents the Atonement Trinity working together under the power of God's Will and Authority to wake us up. She is, in essence, Kamadeva's partner and proxy in the dream of separation.

A particularly beautiful depiction of Kamadeva astride his vahana.

To convince you beyond a shadow of a doubt that Kamadeva represents Divine Love, let's briefly explore the symbols generally associated with the so-called "Indian Cupid." First and foremost, he rides a green parrot called "Suka" -- a compound of "su" (holy or sacred) and "ka" (the Great Purusha). And the Purusha is the Cosmic Being, Universal Principle, or Light of God underneath the illusion of form. And that "being," "principle," or "light" is Perfect Love -- ergo, Kamadeva, the Love of God, "bears the whole state of being, of Heaven and earth together," as stated in this Vedic verse. As a symbol in and of itself, the parrot represents communication or, more specifically, God's pure communications, while the color green is associated with the Anahata or Heart Chakra -- the proverbial mouth through which Indra speaks God's "heart-cave" thoughts inside the Temple (through Shiva and Vishnu).
That Kamadeva carries a bow and arrow might be one reason he's confused with Cupid. Unlike Cupid's weapon, however, Kamadeva's bow is made from sugarcane, with a beeline for a string -- symbols representing "the sweet and constant communication" (to quote Course-Jesus) God shares with us through the Atonement Trinity.
Also unlike Cupid, Kamadeva doesn't shoot arrows to make mischief among humans. His quiver holds flowers, but not any-old flowers; five very specific flowers: a white lotus, a blue lotus, a mango-tree flower, an Ashoka-tree flower, and jasmine flowers. I'm certain they each represent something more spiritually meaningful than what the Google-bot tells us they represent, all of which are aspects of ego-inspired "special love."

Let's proceed to the next verse. Rv 1.10.8 contains several words we've encountered before, as well as a handful of "unsolved mysteries" in Vedic and Sanskrit scholarship (all of which I've striven to decipher). Far away from Muller's standard construction, the line reads: asmabhyam dhunuhi asrutkarna srudhi havam nu dadhisva me girah indra stomam imam mama krsva.

My translation:
The grindstone of fear, the continuous sound of the "U" compels attentive listening to that which is heard; the call of now-consciousness granting knowledge of one's own Higher Self to restore the voice of King Indra speaking from the mouth of the Dear Friend, Krishna-Shiva.
My divisions and definitions:

asma-bhyaṃ (the grindstone of fear) dhūn-u-hi (the continuous sound of "U" compels) āśrutkarṇa (attentive listening) śrudhī (to that which is heard) havaṃ (the call of) nū (now) cid (consciousness) dadhiṣva (granting knowledge of one's own Higher Self) me (to restore) giraḥ (the voice of) indra (King Indra, the Red Ray) stomam (speaking from) imam (the mouth of) mama (the dear friend) kṛ-ṣvā (aiding the Soul or Krishna-Shiva)
My notes:
In the Course, Jesus tells us the Holy Spirit is both the Call to Awaken and the Dear Friend. In Hinduism, the Call to Awaken is personified as Vishnu, coming from Shiva, while "dear friend" is a description applied to both Shiva and Krishna (the eighth incarnation of Vishnu). So, the enigmatic "krsva," which appears five times in the Rig Veda, could easily mean "Krishna and Shiva," who are indeed closely linked in the Hindu literature. Krishna is, in fact, the Christ-realized form of Vishnu.
In the following from the Course, Jesus parrots this Vedic verse (and the next one) in mind-blowing ways:

I have assured you that the Mind that decided for me is also in you, and that you can let it change you just as it changed me. This Mind is unequivocal, because it hears only one Voice and answers in only one way. You are the light of the world with me. Rest does not come from sleeping but from waking. The Holy Spirit is the Call to awaken and be glad. The world is very tired, because it is the idea of weariness. Our task is the joyous one of waking it to the Call for God. Everyone will answer the Call of the Holy Spirit, or the Sonship cannot be as one. What better vocation could there be for any part of the Kingdom than to restore it to the perfect integration that can make it whole? Hear only this through the Holy Spirit within you, and teach your brothers to listen as I am teaching you. When you are tempted by the wrong voice, call on me to remind you how to heal by sharing my decision and making it stronger. As we share this goal, we increase its power to attract the whole Sonship, and to bring it back into the oneness in which it was created. Remember that “yoke” means “join together,” and “burden” means “message.” Let us restate “My yoke is easy and my burden light” in this way; “Let us join together, for my message is light.” (ACIM, T-5.II.10:1–11:4)
According to the Agni Purana, the letter "U" means both "Shiva" and "protection." Other sources say the stand-alone letter "U" also can denote the moon. And that's right, figuratively speaking, because Shiva is indeed another name for Soma, the Golden Circle of Forgiveness glowing in the "Night" of ego ignorance. And, as we've learned in previous Suktas, Shiva also is Shesha, the five-headed serpent water-palanquin keeping Vishnu-Narayana afloat in the thought-waters of perception.
Confusing, isn't it?
The "U" referenced herein is almost certainly the "U" in both Anu, the three-part Name of God, and AUM, an alternative spelling of Om. There's a lot of speculation out there about what AUM and its three letters represent, very little of which is accurate. Om/Aum is not, for example, the primordial sound that brought material creation into being. Rather, Om/Aum is God's gentle-yet-effective remedy for the madness provoking material miscreation. The vibratory "song" of the Red Ray, Om/Aum gently and gradually dissolves, layer by layer, the projected thought-forms imprisoning our Soul-minds in the dream of separation. The sound is, in effect, God speaking to us, through the Christ Mind, at a frequency that acts upon our minds in the manner of a vibratory cleaning device.

Or, as Course-Jesus explains:

The principle of Atonement [Shiva] and the separation began at the same time. When the ego was made, God placed in the mind the Call to joy. This Call is so strong that the ego always dissolves at Its sound. That is why you must choose to hear one of two voices within you. One you made yourself, and that one is not of God. But the other is given you by God, Who asks you only to listen to it. The Holy Spirit is in you in a very literal sense. His is the Voice that calls you back to where you were before and will be again. It is possible even in this world to hear only that Voice and no other. It takes effort and great willingness to learn. It is the final lesson that I learned, and God’s Sons are as equal as learners as they are as Sons. (ACIM, T-5.II.3:1-11)

Om/Aum is the "music" Nataraja-Shiva broadcasts to advance the Wheel of the Soul's spiritual journey at the universal level. As Jesus and the rishis all explain, listening to the sound turns the wheel faster for everybody.

Nearer the truth is that the "U" in AUM "represents the steadiness that carries us along (in the dream-state), and maintains Creation in a state of equilibrium" -- but only if by "creation" we mean Brahman's "big-C" Creation, and NOT Brahma's cheap and tawdry truth-blocking substitute. The "U" stands for, I believe, Uchchaihshravas, "the Mighty Horse stabilizing the Great Purusha's cycles of the universe." And Uchchaihshravas -- "that which ends dividing the glory of the All" -- is Shiva, the "forgiveness" aspect of the Atonement Trinity. And that is why Shiva is known as both "the destroyer" and "the transcendent aspect of Brahman."

Because, as Course-Jesus explains: 

Forgiveness is the healing of the perception of separation. Correct perception of your brother is necessary, because minds have chosen to see themselves as separate. Spirit knows God completely. That is its miraculous power. The fact that each one has this power completely is a condition entirely alien to the world’s thinking. The world believes that if anyone has everything, there is nothing left. But God’s miracles are as total as His Thoughts because they ARE His Thoughts. (ACIM, T-3.V.9:1-7)

In another part of the Course, he says:

From knowledge, where He has been placed by God, the Holy Spirit calls to you, to let forgiveness rest upon your dreams, and be restored to sanity and peace of mind. Without forgiveness will your dreams remain to terrify you. And the memory of all your Father’s Love will not return to signify the end of dreams has come.

Accept your Father’s gift. It is a Call from Love to Love, that It be but Itself. The Holy Spirit is His gift, by which the quietness of Heaven is restored to God’s beloved Son. Would you refuse to take the function of completing God, when all He wills is that you be complete?

(ACIM, W-pII.7.4:1–5:4)  

Most things I've read equate the "U" in AUM with Vishnu, the "preserver," and the "M" with Shiva, "the destroyer." Not sure why, but it makes more sense the other way around. Not that we can really separate the Voice from the Mouth.

Even so, the AUM is a powerful tool for our salvation, given to us by God through the Holy Spirit. And since all the tools of salvation arose from the churning of the Ocean of Milk, it only stands to reason that the three components the letters represent can be found in that vitally important allegory.

Rather than leave you guessing, I'll tell you outright what I believe they are:

A = Amrita, "the elixir of immortality" that is the Call to Awaken (Indra)

U = Uchchaihshravas, the "Mighty Horse" conveying the Call (Shiva)

M = Madeira, the wine of truth we "hear" and "drink" to undo the perceived separation and restore the Covenant of Love that is the Holy Relationship (Vishnu)

If you've been following my blog, you'll know that the phrase "wine of truth" came up in a previous discussion, when I retranslated on the fly a verse from Rv 1.19 to prove a point. The verse read:

The first red ray of dawn, the true state of being in the Walled City protecting the Creator's dream-destroying Wine of Truth, produces the sound arising from the fiery baptism of God's family name. 

The Sanskrit word translated as "wine of truth" was "madhu," which occurs about twenty times in the Rig Veda (according to Google-bot). As explained in the post where it came up, the definition of "madhu" has evolved over time. Presumed today to mean "honey" or "sweet," the word originally meant "mead" -- a wine made from honey, which, in ancient times, was known as the "wine of truth." 


Madeira, the "wine of truth" that emerged from the Ocean of Milk, is personified in Hinduism as Varuni, the goddess of "spiritual wine" that brings joy to the Soul. And that "madeira" or "madhu" is the true "drink" provided by Soma. It's also the symbolic "wine" in the equally symbolic "chalice" Jesus passed among his disciples at the Last Supper. And that "wine" is indeed "the blood of the new and everlasting covenant." Not the "blood" from the veins of Jesus, the man; but the "Amrita" from the Red Ray -- the Word of God or Logos, whose vibratory Call to Forgive preserves the Covenant of Love by "washing away the perceptual errors of the world."

 

Now that we better apprehend what AUM represents, let's debunk one of the most common misnomers surrounding the sound. The Yogic Encyclopedia, for example, explains:

All of manifestation is created, preserved in the created state for some time, then eventually destroyed. AUM, therefore, encompasses the three vibratory energies required to create, preserve, and destroy, and each of these energies vibrates at a different frequency.

The three letters of AUM represent these three vibrations inherent in creation. (Even through the variant spelling in English is "Om," AUM is more accurate.) "A (Akaar)" represents the vibration that brings into manifestation the created universe; "U (Ukaar)" represents the vibration that preserves the creation; and "M" (Makaar)" represents the destructive vibration that dissolves the manifested universe back into Infinite Spirit.

Partly right and partly wrong, this definition suffers from what Course-Jesus calls "level confusion." AUM is a gift from Brahman, who has nothing to do with material creation -- apart from providing us with the tools to end the madness. Only Brahma, the Ego Mind,  "creates to destroy." Brahman's creations are eternal, unchanging, and formless. The three letters of AUM represent, therefore, not "the three vibrations inherent in creation," but the three-in-one vibratory powers sounding in unison to bring about our liberation from self-creating madness run amok.

Like I said in a much earlier post, those are the three Holy Powers making up the real Atonement Trinity, which does NOT include the imposter-creator Brahma. In run-of-the-mill Hinduism (if such a thing exists), Shiva is more often called "the destroyer" than "the protector." In truth, he is both. Rightly understood (as this verse explains), Shiva protects the wholeness of God's Holy Creation by destroying the dark, deceptive, and divisive "self-creations" promoted by Brahma.

Okay, so ... if "krsva" does indeed mean "Krishna and Shiva," this Vedic verse also explains that Shiva and Krishna join forces to speak for King Indra, the Red Ray. And that jibes in many respects with the story of King Indra surrendering his earthly authority to Krishna (as told in the Harivamsha Purana, an appendix to the Mahabharata epic delineating the lineage of Krishna).

Let's move on to the next verse (Rv 1.10.9), which now reads: yujas cid antaram hi tva vrsantamam vajesu havanasrutam vrsantamasya humaha utim sahasrasatamam a tuna.

My translation:

Unite in thought within the shared mind compelling the self obstructing the peaceful holy vibration to offer the oblation received through hearing Shiva, the mouth of the one Self, the Great God protecting the mighty essence of wholeness in God's quiver.

My divisions and definitions:

yujaś (unite to receive) cid (the consciousness) antaram (within) vidmā (the shared mind) hi (compelling) tvā (the self) vṛ-ṣantamaṃ (obstructing the peaceful) vājeṣu (holy vibration) havana-śrutam (to offer the oblation received through hearing) vṛṣan-tam-asya (Indra or Shiva, the mouth of the one self) hūmaha (the Great God) ūtiṃ (protecting) sahas-rasā-tamām (the mighty essence of wholeness) ā (in God's) tūna (quiver).

My notes:

Some sources say "vrsan" is a name for Indra, while others say it refers to Shiva. I went with Shiva for these reasons: 1) Vrsan also means "bull" and Shiva's vahana is a bull; 2) Shiva rather than Indra is known as "the Great God"; 3) Shiva is recognized in Hinduism as the protector of Creation's wholeness; and 4) Shiva is the mouth of the One Self that is Indra. 
Unacquainted with the metaphor "God's quiver," I looked it up. And guess what? The same figure of speech is used three times in the Old Testament of the Holy Bible. In Isaiah 49:2, Psalms 127:5, and Lamentations 3:13. Having read the latter two, I distrust their translations, so I'll only share and comment on the following from Isaiah:

And he hath made my mouth like a sharp sword; in the shadow of his hand hath he hid me, and made me a polished shaft; in his quiver hath he hid me; and said unto me, "Thou art my servant, O Israel, in whom I will be glorified."
We were, in other words, born into this world to serve and glorify God -- not to do our own thing. And everything we experience is designed to hone us into sharp arrows in God's quiver, to be shot from His Bow at the right time in the dream to move the Atonement Plan forward.


One more verse to go, and it's a whopper.  There are, in fact, only ten lines in the tenth Sukta, rather than the twelve designated by Max Muller. The final line, which is rather long, reads: indra ka-uśika mandasānaḥ sutam  piba navyam āyuḥ pra sū tira kṛdhī sahas-rasām ṛṣim pari tvā girvaṇo gira imā bhavantu viśva-taḥ vṛd-dhā-yum anu vṛd-dhayo juṣṭā bhavantu juṣṭayaḥ.

My translation:

Indra, the silent Purusha; the fire of life in the sacred sound; the drinking vessel of life advancing holiness through creative thought, the mighty essence of the Rishi Circle; the Self speaking in praise of the Om, the voice from the Mouth of the All, the whole underneath, growing upwards in glory to connect with Anu, the Ancient One endowing the All with Divine Light.

My word divisions and definitions:

indra (Indra) ka-uśika (the silent purusha) mandasānaḥ (the fire of life) sutam (in the sacred sound) piba (the drinking) navyam (vessel) āyuḥ (of life) pra (advancing) sū (holiness) tira (through) kṛdhī (creative thought) sahas-rasām (the mighty essence of) ṛṣim (the rishi) pari (circle) tvā (the Self) girvaṇo (speaking in praise of the Om) gira (the voice) imā (from the mouth of) bhavantu (the all) viśva-taḥ (the whole underneath) vṛd-dhā-yum (growing upwards in glory to connect with) anu (Anu) vṛd-dhayo (the ancient one ) juṣṭā (endowing) bhavantu (the all) juṣṭayaḥ (with divine light)

My notes:

Wow. Told you this was a humdinger of a finale. It's also a fantastic encyclopedic definition of what Indra represents in the Hindu pantheon. Such a shame he isn't worshipped anymore in India. But maybe he will be again after more people find my blog.

Most of this echoes our previous discussions about Indra. The two things that stand out as worthy of further investigation and discussion are the phrases "the silent Purusha" and "the Rishi Circle."  To my mind, identifying Indra as "the silent Purusha" suggests that the Red Ray exists in the state of being known as "the silence beyond Om." I won't comment further until I do more research, but my intuition tells me that's right. 

The Rishi Circle is another mystery. My gut tells me it's a reference to the circle of miracle-workers on a higher plane sending healing energy into the world through the Om vibration. I also suspect the Rishi Circle is somehow related to the circle of elders John the Elder describes in Revelations 4:4, as well as (perhaps) the Teachers of Teachers Course-Jesus discusses in the Manual for Teachers. Again, I'll say no more until I receive further clarification.

Okay, so ... that's the tenth Sukta, done and dusted.  And what a beautiful and insightful teaching! I'm in awe, truly, and so grateful for this gift.

Until next time, Om Hari Om and God bless.

Monday, August 19, 2024

Unlocking the TRUE Timeless Wisdom of Rig Veda 8.7 (Part 2 of 4)





We've unlocked a goodly store of timeless wisdom already, and we've only got through the first verse of Rig Veda 8.7! So, let's move on to the Rik's second line, which reads: yad aṅga taviṣīyavo yāmaṃ śubhrā acidhvam ni parvatā ahāsata.

Wilson's translation:
When, glorious and powerful (Maruts), you fit out your chariot, the mountains depart (from their places).
My translation:

Strive to sound the sacred-syllable (Om/Aum), the song of the mind supplying Yama's Holy Circle of Wholeness within the Temple of the Spirit of Divine Truth.

My definitions worksheet:

yat (Strive to) aṅ-ga (sound the ga -- the sacred syllable or guru word, Om), ta-viṣīya-vo  (the song of the mind supplying) yāmaṃ (Yama's) śu-bhrā (Holy Circle) acidhvam (Wholeness) ni (within) parvatā (the Temple) ahā-sat(y)a (of the Spirit of Divine Reality or Truth)
My notes:

Let's start with the word or name yamam, which is typically translated as Yamaraja or Lord Yama, the presumed Hindu god of death. The word is also sometimes defined as "twin," "twin-born," or even "forgiveness." And when divided as ya-mam, the term can also mean "united Self." Interestingly, all of those definitions work interchangeably -- and also reveal different shades of the true character of Lord Yama.

 


Lord Yama, as commonly depicted in Hindu iconography.

  

While out surfing for information, I came across a description of Yama on, oddly enough, the website for the Getty Museum in Los Angeles (my ego's old stomping grounds). That description reads as follows:

In the mythology of India, Yama is revered as the god of the dead. The Vedas reportedly describe him as the first man who died, blazing the path of mortality down which all humans have since followed. He is also assigned guardianship of the south (the region of death) and presides over the resting place of the dead, which is located under the earth. In the Vedas, Yama was represented as a cheerful king of the departed ancestors, not as a punisher of sins, but in later mythology, he became known as the just judge (Dharmaraja) who weighs the good and evil deeds of the dead and determines retribution. He is described as majestic in appearance, green or black, with red eyes and red garments. He carries a noose and a mace, which may be ornamented with a skull, and rides a buffalo. His two four-eyed dogs guard the entrance to his kingdom, and the crow and the pigeon act as his messengers. Yama has also passed over into Buddhist mythology in Tibet, China, and Japan, where he occupies a similar but minor role as the guardian of the abode of the dead.

The first thing we need to understand is that Yama's characterization as the god of death is an interpretive error of monumental proportions. He does indeed preside over "the Resting Place," but not "the resting place of the dead." The resting place over which Yama presides is the Holy Meeting Place, which does indeed lie "beneath" the Ego Mind's external projection of mortal existence.
That he guards the southern direction or compass-point (on the Wheel of Samsara-Maya) also is correct, if we understand that is the location of the door into the Temple. His four-eyed dogs are, therefore, the double-wheeled chakras, through which we "see" either inwardly or outwardly at the four different levels of "ego-self" construction.
Rightly understood, Yama represents the part of us, to borrow from Psalms 23, that "walks through the valley of the shadow of death, fearing no evil." Yama is, in essence, the "seed" of the Red Ray -- the divine "star" or "spark" residing within the Temple inside our minds. He is, therefore, the only part that's real, divine, and eternal -- and, consequently, the only part whose growth, well-being, and "success" matters in the least.

 


In the multi-round "game of forgiveness" worldly existence actually is, Yama is the marker we must advance toward the "home circle" (quite literally) to make progress toward "winning." When we retire our ego-jerseys at the end of each lifespan, Yama is the only part that remains. And where that marker sits on the board when we "step away" between rounds is where we start the next one. And yes, that marker can move backwards, as many did, apparently, in the war-torn and hate-bedeviled 20th Century.

(Hence, the need for the Celestial Speed-up of the Atonement Plan, which the Course facilitates -- and also the reason, I suspect, the spirit of the Rig Veda has waited until now to reveal its wisdom.)

To extend the "game" metaphor, the home circle at the center of the board is the "Resting Place" over which Yama presides. That Resting Place is BOTH the Holy Circle of Wholeness referenced in this verse, the Wellspring of the Bible,  AND the Meeting Place, Golden Circle, and Circle of Atonement discussed in the Course. And that sacred wellspring, place, pasture, circle, or citadel is, in point of fact, the focus of this Sukta (as you'll see) -- and not (to repeat) an army of non-existent storm gods.

As this Sukta also explains, that Holy Circle of Wholeness is where we exchange, as Souls, Stars, or Yamas, the Living Water that IS the separation-healing yajna and/or miracle-working "ritual-practice." And, as this verse makes clear, the source of that lustrating water, miracle, or grace is the mind sounding the Song of Heaven or Om/Aum vibration. And it is through the exchange of that "unstruck sound" that we ready ourselves (and each other) to enter the Holy Instant of Eternity that awaits just above and beneath that separation-dissolving Circle of Wholeness.

Until we choose "salvation" or "enlightenment" as the sole purpose of earthly existence, Yama -- the "seed" of the "vine" of the Christ Self -- remains dormant in the second chakra or mansion. To germinate and sprout, that little "seed" requires the Living Water supplied by the healed and whole Christ Mind. And, once Yama starts to grow, his maturing tendrils require regular "pruning" -- i.e., removal of the egoic thoughts and beliefs that bear no spiritual "fruit."

Bible-Jesus explains all of this in John 15, wherein he says:

I [the Christ Self] am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit. Now ye are clean through the Word [the guru word, OM] which I have spoken unto you. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.

In this verse from John, Jesus describes the process by which our false ego-body identity is gently and gradually stripped away by the Christ Self and its atonement-restoring agents.  In the Middle World, those agents bring the Living Water WE produce for each other's salvation down the three branches on the right-hand side of the Menorah. As that water gently "washes away" Yama's sin-perceiving shell-mind, he rises vine-like up the lampstand's central channel. As he rises, his light grows brighter. And it is that brightening inner-radiance, I believe, that lights up, in succession, the three lamps on the Menorah's left-hand side.

Not exactly sure how this all works, but I believe the three Blood Ray lamps serve as markers of Yama's progress. Perhaps they represent "initiation," "discipleship," and "mastery" -- or something to that effect. I can't really say at this point. What I can say is this: The more Living Water we gather together at the Wellspring to produce, the faster the dream of separation ends for everyone.

Or, as the old adage rightly communicates: 


 

Stated sans metaphors: The more time we spend meditating on the Om/Aum with the miracle-minded intention of sharing its lustrating power with everyone, the quicker the dream the Evil One spun to imprison the Son of God will evaporate. 

When Course-Jesus says "no one goes to Heaven alone," this is mainly what he means. As stated before, WE produce the Living Water for each other's salvation, which the Holy Spirit's "graces" then send down (into the desert) through the channels, branches, or "sacred rivers" of the Temple Menorah.

In the Course, Jesus explains the same idea thusly:

The power of the Sons of God is present all the time, because they were created as creators. Their influence on each other is without limit, and must be used for their joint salvation. Each one must learn to teach that all forms of rejection are meaningless. The separation is the notion of rejection. As long as you teach this you will believe it. This is not as God thinks, and you must think as He thinks if you are to know Him again.

Remember that the Holy Spirit is the Communication Link between God the Father and His separated Sons. If you will listen to His Voice [the Om] you will know that you cannot either hurt or be hurt, and that many need your blessing to help them hear this for themselves. When you perceive only this need in them, and do not respond to any other, you will have learned of me and will be as eager to share your learning as I am.

Got it? Good. Let's now explore yamam's alternative meaning as "twin" or "twin-born." Rightly understood, the indwelling "seed" is a twin -- a conjoined "mini-me" of the Blood and Water Rays. Yama is the Blood Ray's "spark" or "star," while his twin sister, Yami, is the Water Ray's smaller reflection. Yama is, therefore, the equivalent of Adam -- the part of us God created by extending the first Red Ray of Creation, whereas Yami was born of the Holy Spirit to wake Adam up from the dream of exile from Eden. As explained in my post on Genesis, the Hebrew word adam originally meant "red," while eve is Hebrew for "spirit."
 


The Rig Veda and other early Hindu texts rightly associate Yama with the Sun or Greater Light, as well as the "underworld" (the lightless realm of "death" below the Menorah's first set of branches). As the "seed" awaiting germination in the lowest chamber of the Temple, Yama also is accurately described as the guardian of immortality and Satya -- the Law of the Highest Truth of our Being. Rightly understood, the Highest Truth of our Being is the Perfect Love or Agape the Father extended to create the Sonship "in His own image." The Red Ray is, therefore, the First, Last, and Only Ray of God's Perfect Love, as well as the everlasting love or presence of the Father (and His Creative Will) within every part of the Sonship. 

The Isha Upanishad, one of the Vedantic texts, also correctly identifies Yama as one of the "twin children of the wide-shining Lord of Truth."

Yami, meanwhile, is generally downplayed in the Hindu lore as a river goddess whose other names are Yamuna and Kalinda. Yami is, of course, much more than a river-spirit, as I'll explain in more detail at another time. For now just know that the Hindu scriptures rightly identify Yami and Yama as the offspring of Surya (the Hindu sun-god personifying the Greater Light) and Saranyu, who is typically (and erroneously) written off as an inconsequential cloud goddess.

 


Saranyu, with her husband Surya, on his chariot-throne drawn by seven white horses. Those seven white horses represent the Spirits or Lamps of the Menorah.

Saranyu's mythological genealogy tells the real story. As the daughter of Tvashta (the divine artisan) and the mother of Yama, Yami, the twin Ashvins, the first man, the current "manu" or race of humans, and the horse-master Revanta, she almost certainly personifies the Moon or Soma, the "mother spirit" of the Water Ray -- the Ray of God's Grace, which we empower through the practice of True Forgiveness.

The Hindu lore surrounding Yama and Yami makes a lot of sense to me symbolically. To share more of it would, however, take more time and space than I care to devote to them at present. So, just know that they sleep together in the lowest chakra until we ask the Holy Spirit to open our minds to the spiritual purpose of earthly existence.


Let's proceed to Rv 8.7.3, which reads: ud īrayanta vāyubhir vāśrāsaḥ pṛśnimātaraḥ dhukṣanta pipyuṣīm iṣam.

Wilson's translation:

The loud-sounding sons of Prsni drive with their breezes (the clouds), they milk forth nutritious sustenance.

My translation:

Sink below the earthly artifice of separation, lifespans, and fear to the Resting Place of the infinite Prisni-producing Star kindling the peace, wholeness, fullness, and joyfulness of the Supreme Spirit.

 My definition worksheet:

ut (Sink below) īra-yanta (the earthly artifice) v-āyu-bhir (of separation, lifespans, and fear) vāśrā-saḥ (to the Resting Place of the infinite) pṛiśni-ma-taraḥ (Prisni-producing Star) dhuk-santa (kindling the peace) pipyuṣīm (wholeness [pi], fullness [py], and joyfulness [usi]) iṣam (of the Supreme Spirit)

My notes:

This verse echoes everything I just explained about Yama -- not that you'd ever know this from Wilson's nonsensical translation. His first mistake is reducing prsni-matarah to the singular name "Prisni," when it actually means "the Prisni-producing star" or, alternatively, "the Prisni-producing sacred-syllable."

Before we can fully understand either translation, we need to know who or what Prisni represents. I didn't know, so I looked it up. What I found was a thorny thicket of ego-inspired mistranslation and misinterpretation obscuring this Holy Power's true identity. Hacking through the light-blocking bramble, I ascertained that Prisni, in point of fact, personifies the Living Water.

Allow me to present my evidentiary argument. 

Firstly, Prisni is believed to be white in color, a supposition based on early Vedic scholar Sayana's translation of the word subhravarvam as "bright white" or "pure white." In actually, the word combines "su" (holy or sacred), "bhra" (circle or ring) and "varvam," which means "syllable" or "song." And, as the Living Water, Prisni is indeed produced by the sacred-syllable or vibratory "song" emanating from the Red Ray.

Secondly, Prisni is described in various myths as the rain-producing Aditya (celestial power of the Greater Light), who bestows the Peace of God that will ultimately bring about universal enlightenment. And these are indeed attributes of the Living Water.

Thirdly, Prisni is erroneously believed to be the mother of the Maruts, based on two major misnomers. The first of these stems from dividing the Vedic phrase prsni-matrn-maruto to mean "Prisni, the mother of the Maruts." The components should, in fact, be divided as prsni-ma-trn-maruto. The key that unlocks its true meaning is the right definition for "trn." If it's "trin" (as generally presumed), it supposedly means either "grass," "three," or "trinity." That the missing vowel is an "i" is, however, rather presumptive. More likely, the word is an abbreviated form of "tran" or "trana," which means "shelter," "protector," "preserver," or "savior" with regard to the embodied Soul. "Trana" is, in fact, a Sanskrit word meaning "salvation."

Thus, Prisni-ma-tran-maruto tells us Prisni is either the protector and savior of the first Red Ray of Creation or the salvation-granting arm of the same. 

What's the second error? The widespread belief that the Maruts are a deific unit discussed at length in the Vedas and other Hindu texts, when that is, in fact, a complete fallacy (as I intend to prove). 

Fourthly, Prisni is associated with cows -- or believed to be a cow -- because she's described in the Vedas as identical to "gau" -- the Sanskrit word for cow. But Prisni isn't a reflection of "gau," she mirrors the "ga-u" -- the sacred syllable "ga," which is Om/Aum -- the Holy Name or essence of the first Red Ray of Creation. As the Living Water, she is, in other words, identical to the Om/Aum, which is dead-accurate.

Thanks to Brahma's treachery, this all got twisted over time in the Hindu consciousness until Prisni became gau-mata, the sacred milk-giving Mother Cow, as well as Kamadenhu, the miracle-cow. Right-mindedly understood, the "milk" these two symbolic cows supply to humans is the deception-dissolving Living Water of God's Grace -- and NOT earth-body nourishment or good-fortune. The desire for worldly good-fortune, in fact, blocks the flow of grace -- the reason Bible-Jesus declares that a rich man stands a snowball's chance in Judea of entering the Kingdom of Heaven (or words to that effect).

Curiously, I could locate no images depicting Prisni as Prisni on the Web. I did, however, find images I believe to be Prisni in some of the forms she assumes in modern-day Hinduism.

 


Narayani, the consort of Nara, is almost certainly Prisni, the Living Water. And Nara is, in fact, mentioned more than once in this Rik.

 

Kamadhenu, the miracle cow, sporting the head of a woman, the wings of a swan, and the tail of a peacock. All three of these attributes also are associated with Savasvati, who brings the Living Water down to the Middle World through the music of her veena. Prisni and Sarasvati both represent the Living Water in slightly different ways. In the image above, notice the golden rings around the fetlocks of the cow, as well as the lingam-yoni figure under her udder, because these are further clues to her real identity and function. 

  

I haven't yet "rested my case," because Prisni also is known as "devagopa," which, again, has nothing to do with cowherds or cattle. Rather, deva-gopa (like Trasu) means "protector of the holiness or wholeness" (of the Son of God), and that is indeed the role the Living Water plays in the at-one-ment process.

And, finally, the legends tell us Varuna presented the dakshina to Prisni. Confusingly, dakshina can refer to either a fee paid to a priest after performing a ceremony or to the right-hand side of something -- so go figure. In this case, the word definitely means "right-hand side," because that is indeed the side of the Menorah through which the Living Water flows to the central channel housing Yama/Yami. So, Varuna, the "senior" Water Ray in the Upper World, gifted the right-hand side of the Menorah to Prisni, the down-flowing Living Water or "milk of truth" granting corrective miracles in the Middle World through the three sacred rivers of the Menorah.

As my evidence suggests, prisni is, in fact, one of the most misunderstood words in the Vedas (alongside "ga-u," which does NOT mean "cows"). Most commonly, prisni is translated as "speckled," "spotted," or "dappled" in the context of cows, antelope, or deer. The word also is sometimes defined as "starry sky," which is, in fact, the evolutionary root of the speckles, spots, and dapples. Understanding this explains why the antelopes or gazelles pulling Soma's chariot have spotted hides (or should, anyway, when accurately rendered). The antelopes or gazelles represent the twin anointing oils, while their spotted coats symbolize the "stars" of the Great Rays (in us) singing together to produce and disperse those "oils" within the Temple.

 


Soma or Chandra's one-wheeled chariot represents the Temple or Inner-Instrument of the Holy Spirit, while the twin antelopes pulling that chariot symbolize the anointing oils of atonement produced by the Great Rays and their "stars," "sparks," or "seeds" in all living creatures.


If we study the range of meanings attached to prisni, a clearer picture emerges. As the Living Water's lustrating miracles dissolve the thought-errors obstructing Christ's Vision, the material illusion gradually fades, until we "see" only the stars underneath the forms. Hence, the "starry sky" definition of prisni. Eventually, the perceived spaces between the stars also fade away -- leaving only a continuous field of brilliant light, extending into infinity.

In the Course, Jesus says essentially the same thing in slightly different language:

In many only the spark remains, for the Great Rays are obscured. Yet God has kept the spark alive so that the Rays can never be completely forgotten. If you but see the little spark you will learn of the Greater Light, for the Rays are there unseen. Perceiving the spark will heal, but knowing the light will create. Yet in the returning the little light must be acknowledged first, for the separation was a descent from magnitude to littleness. But the spark is still as pure as the Great Light, because it is the remaining call of creation. Put all your faith in it, and God Himself will answer you. (ACIM, T-10.IV.8:1-7)

He means that we learn to perceive the little light (the spark in everything), which heals, through our Golden Circle miracle-exchanges or yajnas. Those exchanges of grace between equals, in turn, prepare us for the Holy Instant, wherein we perceive the Rays and return to Heaven -- the realm of Perfect Creation. So, salvation is really a progressive, three-step process leading to the fourth and final step, which God undertakes when we're "revelation-ready" (to borrow from Course-Jesus). In very simple terms, the three preparatory steps are these:

    1. Choose salvation over worldly concerns (move into the Temple)

    2. Once inside the Temple, do the ego-undoing work necessary to hear the Living Water or Om/Aum

    3. Once you hear the Om/Aum, imagine yourself in the Golden Circle, giving and receiving separation-dissolving peace, love, light, joy, and grace to everyone equally and without exception, as often as possible. Then, just concentrate on listening to the Holy Name, whilst striving to merge with it.

Or, as Course-Jesus explains along similar lines:

As the ego would limit your perception of your brothers to the body, so would the Holy Spirit release your vision and let you see the Great Rays shining from them, so unlimited that they reach to God. It is this shift to vision that is accomplished in the Holy Instant. Yet it is needful for you to learn just what this shift entails, so you will become willing to make it permanent. Given this willingness it will not leave you, for it IS permanent. Once you have accepted it as the only perception you want, it is translated into knowledge by the part that God Himself plays in the Atonement, for it is the only step in it He understands. Therefore, in this there will be no delay when you are ready for it. God is ready now, but you are not. (ACIM, T-15.IX.1:1–2:1

A little further on, he says:

In the Holy Instant, where the Great Rays replace the body in awareness, the recognition of relationships without limits is given you. But in order to see this, it is necessary to give up every use the ego has for the body, and to accept the fact that the ego has no purpose you would share with it. For the ego would limit everyone to a body for its own purposes, and while you think it has a purpose, you will choose to utilize the means by which it tries to turn its purpose into accomplishment. This will never be accomplished. Yet you have surely recognized that the ego, whose goals are altogether unattainable, will strive for them with all its might, and will do so with the strength that you have given it. (ACIM, T-15.IX.3:1-5

In the Text's next chapter, Jesus drives the point home and also busts one of the biggest myths the Evil One contrived to lead us astray: the complete fallacy that family and friends are our greatest sources of happiness in the world. Family and friends are, in absolute honesty, the biggest generators of the guilt and fear chaining our Souls to the millstone of earthly existence. Are, therefore, "family values" -- whatever that vaporous phrase is supposed to mean -- also "Christian values"? Not even remotely, as Jesus makes as plain in the New Testament, as he does in the Course.

In Luke 14:26, for example, he says:

If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. 

And, yes -- the author of Luke did indeed write HATE, as hard as that is to believe. Because I checked -- and the original Greek word transcribed as "hate" by the KJV translators was misew, which translates as "hate," "detest," or "abhor."

"But wait," you might be thinking, "doesn't Jesus implore us elsewhere to love one another?" He does indeed, but he doesn't mean to love each other's UNREAL ego-body personas. Right-mindedly perceived, those ego-body personas were manufactured by the Evil One to shackle our Souls, naked and afraid, to "asat" -- a Hindu term describing the illusory state of non-being experienced in the demon-infested dream world.

 


If we want to break the fetters binding us to the dream of hell, we have to deny the reality of those body-dwelling personas and our "special relationships" with them. We must, in other words, strive to perceive ONLY the God-authored Self in everyone and the "holy relationship" we share with the "stars" or "Souls" in those projected parts of our own Higher Self. Jesus explains this time and again in the Course AND the Bible, yet nobody seems to get it -- including me, until the difference was spelled out for me recently through a difficult and rather painful test of faith and obedience.

So, let me spare you that distress and spell it out for you just as clearly: 

    1. Special relationships are forged between bodies and egos in the external and, therefore, UNREAL world. All relationships between bodies are "special" and/or "unholy," including those with our parents, siblings, spouses, children, and friends. Special relationships are visible, worldly, and "personal" -- i.e., they exist between two ego-authored personas in bodies who are using each other to "get" something they perceive as lacking in themselves.

    2. Holy relationships are forged between Souls in the Golden Circle. Holy relationships are invisible, otherworldly, and "impersonal" -- i.e., they exist between an unspecified number of Souls gathered together "in the name of Christ" at the Wellspring.

    3. Only through the ONE Holy Relationship we all SHARE can we practice True Forgiveness, genuinely help others, or change the world for the better. It must, however, be said that trying to change the world for the better is akin to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. So, what we really should concentrate on is getting our butts into the lifeboat -- and bringing all the dreaming parts of our Self to safety with us. 


Sound familiar? If not, it should, because that's the REAL message of the story of Noah's Ark. The ark represents the arc formed by the upward reaching branches of the Menorah, while the flood symbolizes the rising tide of Living Water we produce together in wholeness at the Wellspring. 


This also is the message Bible-Jesus attempts to get across in Luke 14:26, and also explains below:

The special relationship is totally meaningless without a body. If you value it, you must also value the body. And what you value you will keep. The special relationship is a device for limiting your Self to a body, and for limiting your perception of others to theirs. The Great Rays would establish the total lack of value of the special relationship, if they were seen. For in seeing them the body would disappear, because its value would be lost. And so your whole investment in seeing it would be withdrawn from it. (ACIM, T-16.VI.4:1-7)

At the risk of flogging a dead horse, we free ourselves from the dream by perceiving ONLY the Divine Spark underneath the body, first in our fellow Souls in the Golden Circle, and then in our own Self-perception. And, when we've forgiven everyone for everything that never happened (because it's only a dream), we will perceive the Great Rays within the spark, reaching all the way back to God.

Let's move on to matarah, the word Wilson completely disregards. Generally, matarah is believed to refer to the seven "Divine Mothers" -- the spirits or lamps enflaming the Temple Menorah. That definition may indeed have merit, but the word can mean other things as well, depending on how it's divided. As ma-tarah, for example, it means "producing (ma) the sacred syllable or star (tarah)." And that definition works much better herein than does "Prisni's mothers" -- or "the sons of Prisni" in reference to the non-existent Maruts.

The word pipyusim was another big stumper. Finding no suitable definition for the whole word, I tried slicing and dicing its syllables every which way -- but (ironically) received "no joy." Eventually, I worked out that pi-py-usi(m) translates as "wholeness, fullness, and joyfulness" -- which ticks all the boxes. So, another Vedic mystery solved by this know-nothing nobody.

Let's now check my interpretation against the Course. Does Jesus say anything similar? He does indeed. Many times, in fact. The citation below is but one example.

We cannot sing redemption’s hymn alone. My task is not completed until I have lifted every voice with mine. And yet it is not mine, for as it is my gift to you, so was it the Father’s gift to me, given me through His Spirit. The sound of it will banish sorrow from the mind of God’s most holy Son, where it cannot abide. Healing in time is needed, for joy cannot establish its eternal reign where sorrow dwells. You dwell not here, but in eternity. You travel but in dreams, while safe at home. Give thanks to every part of you that you have taught how to remember you. Thus does the Son of God give thanks unto his Father for his purity. (ACIM, T-13.VII.17:1-9

 

Inching onward, Rv 8.7.4 reads: vapanti maruto miham pra vepayanti parvatān yad yāmaṃ yānti vāyubhiḥ.

Wilson's translation:

The Maruts scatter the rain, they shake the mountains, when they mount their chariot, with the winds.

My translation:

This sower of the fruits of the first Red Ray of Creation is the Great I Am forwarding the vibratory presence within the Temple that is Yama's defense against separation, lifespans, and fear.

My definitions worksheet:

Vapanti (This sower of the fruits of) maruto (the first Red Ray of Creation) miham (is the Great I Am) pra (advancing) vep-ayanti (the vibratory answer or gift) parvatān (within the Temple) yad (that is) yāmaṃ (Yama's) yānti (defense against) v-āyu-bhiḥ (separation, lifespans, and fear).

My notes:

In the Varaha Purana, Vapanti is the name of a sacred river flowing down from Pariyatra, a holy mountain or kulaparvata in the mythical land of BharataIn this teaching allegory, the Arya and Mleccha tribes dwell in settlements (janapada) along the banks of that sacred river, so they can easily drink its waters.
As with most allegories, the names reveal the story's underlying meaning. Vapanti translates as "sower of fruits," while Pari-yatra means "circle-journey." More precisely, pari means "to circle on foot, especially ceremoniously." The mountain's name, therefore, describes the circle meetings "hearers" of the Om/Aum convene at the Holy Meeting Place. Those hearers or "desert-waterers" form the kulaparvata -- the community of Temple-dwelling disciples the word describes. 
Those same disciples are, incidentally, the parvatas or "mountaineers" mentioned in the Mahabharata epic. In the Hindu pantheon, the level of advancement those disciples have achieved is personified in Hinduism as Parvati, the spiritually disciplined consort of Shiva (the savior aspect of the Christ Self or Bridegroom) and the "mother" of Ganesh (the elephant-headed personification of the Om/Aum vibration). 


Maa Parvati, the second wife of Shiva (reincarnated from the first), is almost always depicted in a red sari.

 

Let's proceed to Rv 8.7.5, which reads: ni yad yāmāya vo girir ni sindhavo vidharmaṇe mahe śuṣmāya yemire.

Wilson's translation:

The mountains are curbed, the rivers are restrained at your coming, for the upholding of your great strength.

My translation:

Within that maya-traveling vehicle, the song arises from the Wholeness (of the Bridegroom) whose Spirit uplifts the mind of joy beneath the illusion of life on earth.

 My definition worksheet:

ni (within) yad (that) yā-māya (illusion-travelling) vah (vehicle) girir or gir-ih (the song arising from) ni (the inner) sindhavah (wholeness [of the Bridegroom]) vi-dhar-maṇe (whose Spirit uplifts the mind) mahe (of joy) śuṣ-māya (beneath the illusion) yem-ire (of life on earth).

Notes:

Like matarahyamaya can be divided different ways to shift its meaning. As yama-ya, for example, it means "Yama-like"; as yam-aya, it means "twin-teaching"; and as ya-maya, it means "maya-journey" or "illusion-journey." All three variations, in fact, convey the same general idea in nuanced ways.

Despite the Sanskrit word yemire appearing several times in the Vedas, suitable definitions are thin on the ground. What kept coming up in my searches was Ymir, a character from Norse mythology whose blood was used to create the world. This tells me, at least, that Ymir represents the Red or Blood Ray in the ancient Norse Edda. And it is indeed that Red Ray that God extended into the dream through the Christ Self to wake us up.

But there is no character of that name in the Hindu lore. So, after hours of spinning my wheels, I finally settled on yemire being a probable compound of "yem" (life) and "ire" (earth). 


Moving on, Rv 8.7.6 reads yuṣmām̐ um iti naktam ūtaye yuṣmān divā havāmahe yuṣmān prayaty adhvare.

Wilson's translation:

We invoke you for protection by night, (we invoke) you by day, (we invoke) you when the sacrifice is in progress.

My translation:

Unite in the sacred song of the Name of Christ coming from Nara's will to awaken. Unite in the sacred song of Heaven's Call of Joy. Unite in the sacred song advancing the guiding spirit shared equally among the parts of one's own Self.

My definitions worksheet:

yu-ṣ(a)mān (Unite in the sacred song of) u (the Name of Christ) iti (coming from) na-ktam (Nara's "ketam" = desire or will). utaye (to arise or awaken) yu-s(a)man (Unite in the sacred song of) diva (Heaven's) hava-mahe (Call of Joy). yu-ṣmān (Unite in the sacred song) pra-yati (advancing the guiding spirit) adha-vare (shared equally among the parts of one's own Self).

My notes:

Let's start with havamahe, an enigmatic term found several times in the Vedas, as well as in a popular mantra honoring Lord Ganesh. The mantra, which allegedly comes from the Vedas, begins with these words: Om Gananam Tva Ganapatim Havamahe. I say allegedly because I haven't yet discovered where in the Vedas this mantra occurs. What I have found is a wide range of translations, none of which hit the mark. Typically, they read something akin to this:
We invoke you, O Lord Ganesha, the leader of the Ganas, the supreme poet, whose fame is unparalleled.

The Ganas are identified in Hinduism as the attendants of Shiva living alongside their master on Mt. Kailash. But the word can also mean "song" and/or "multitudes." So, the "ganas" referenced herein are actually the Souls gathered in the Holy Resting Place to give and receive the vibratory Song of Heaven, Call to Joy, or Om/Aum. And Ganapati or Lord Ganesha personifies that ego-dissolving vibration. He is, therefore, rightly perceived in Hinduism as the "remover of obstacles." The obstacles he removes, however, are those blocking the Peace of God, as opposed to those interfering with our ego goals and desires. In Chapter 19 of the Course's Text, Jesus identifies the FOUR main "obstacles to peace" we must remove with the Holy Spirit's help.

By my calculations, the Ganesha Mantra's opening line should translate more along these lines:
Om, sacred syllable of the divine knowledge belonging to Ganapati's Call of Joy.

Since I'm in the process of setting up an altar to Lord Ganesh above my workspace, I decided to go ahead and translate the whole mantra. Here's what I came up with, line by line:

Kavim Ka-vi-nam-Upama-Shravas-Tamam = Seer of Truth; Spirit of the Great Purusha's Name exemplifying equality and wholeness;

Jyes-s(a)t-tha-ra-ajam Brahman-nam Brahman-aspata (aspada) = Star of the sun and moon; unborn radiance of Brahman's Name in Brahman's abode;

Aa Nah Shrn-van-Nuuti-bhih-Si-ida-Saad-a-nam = Bringer of the wholeness bestowing the desire to break away from the split-mind of fear binding Ida (the channel through which the Living Water flows) by sinking into the Name of God

Om Mahaa-Ganna-Adhipa-taye Namah = Om, great song of the Lord and Provider, I offer respectful obeisance. 

This is actually a really beautiful tribute to Lord Ganesh, which I plan to use when my artisan-made Ganapati statue arrives from India.

 

This is the hand-carved, hand-painted Ganesha figure I ordered from an artist in Jaipur. Isn't he beautiful?
 
Update: Ganapati arrived from India today (8/12/24) and here he is sitting in his mandir on my new pooja altar. I love him so much!! The little scroll under his chowki is a print-out of my translation of the Ganapati Mantra.


Let's move on to prayati adhvare, a phrase used SEVEN times in the Rig Veda. Not unlike havamahe, the correct definition eludes. So, it took some doing to come up with "the offering shared equally among the parts of one's own Self."

The offering of which the rishis speak is the Miracle of the Course -- a fact verified in the excerpt below: 

The power of God, and not of you, engenders miracles. The miracle itself is but the witness that you have the power of God in you. That is the reason why the miracle gives equal blessing to all who share in it, and that is also why everyone shares in it. The power of God is limitless. And being always maximal, it offers everything to every call from anyone. There is no order of difficulty here. A call for help is given help. (ACIM, T-14.X.6:9-15

This brings us to naktam, a word typically defined as "at night" or "night-quarters." And those definitions semi-work, because "Night" is indeed scriptural code for the dream-realm into which Soma -- the Moon and/or Holy Spirit -- shines the Lesser Light to wake us up. I am, nevertheless, more inclined to believe the word herein is a compound of "na" (Nara's) and "k(e)tam" (will)
Sanskrit scholars tell us adding "kta" to the end of a word merely shifts the tense from present to past, but that rule doesn't apply to "nakta" or, for that matter, to "Sukta." I contend, therefore, that "kta" (in cases such as these, at least) may be an abbreviated form of "keta," which can mean "home," "abode," or "shelter," as well as "learned," "knowing," "will," "desire," "intention," "judgment," or even "invitation." As my translations demonstrate, the Suktas of the Rig Veda are not, in fact, "hymns." So, the word can't mean "hymns," as long supposed. It can, however, mean sacred or holy (su) lessons (kta). So, there it is.

I'm also finding that, when the rishis use "na" rather than "nah," they are referring to Nara, who is mentioned again in the next verse. Who is Nara? He's the Blood Ray, basically, as well as the partner of Prisni's aforementioned Narayani persona. In the Hindu lore, Nara is more often associated with Narayana, an incarnation of Lord Vishnu. When correctly interpreted, the name Vishnu is a compound of "vi" (the pervader) and "shnu" (yielding the milk of higher knowing). So, Narayana and Vishnu both represent the Water Ray. 

A quick read of the lore suggests that Nara and Narayana (the twins of Rudra mentioned in the next verse) embody the same basic idea as Yama and Yami and/or Adam and Eve. Thus, Nara is the eternal Light of God or "Blood of Christ" within all earthbound creatures, while Narayani or Narayana represents the Living Water or Saving Grace that "power-washes" Brahma's barnacles off Nara's illusion-encrusted holy hull, so to speak, in the manner akin to a shipyard power-blaster. 

 

The hull of the Sonship is eternally perfect underneath the barnacle-crust of fear and guilt. To purify or lustrate that hull, Narayana gently power-washes those pesky parasites off her patner using a combination of Higher Reason, corrective Miracles of Grace, and the mind recalibrating Om vibration.


This circa-1740 illustration depicts the "twin sages" Nara (left) and Narayana (right) performing "tapas" or "atonements" together on the Sacred Grass inside the Temple (not in the mountains of India, as unilluminated interpreters suggest). Note that they are positioned on the side of the Menorah over which each force reigns.


Let's move on to Rv 8.7.7, which reads: 
udu iti tye aruṇa-psavaś citrā yāmebhir īrate vāśrā adhi ṣṇunā divaḥ.

Wilson's utterly absurd translation:

Truly these purple-hued, wonderful, clamorous Maruts proceed with their chariots in the height above the sky.

My translation:

The stars coming from the Greater Light's first Red Ray bind together to drive the radiant consciousness the twins of Rudra cause to rise in the Meeting Place to begin lustrating Nara's holiness.

My definitions worksheet:

Udu (the stars) iti (coming from) tye (the Greater Light's) aruṇa-pasavah (first Red Ray bind together to drive) citrā (the radiant consciousness) yām-ebhih (the twins of Rudra) īrate (cause to rise) vāśrā (in the Meeting Place) adhi (to begin) ṣṇu-nā (distilling, purifying, or lustrating Nara's) divaḥ (holiness)

My Notes:

Three names are encrypted in this verse, none of which are "Marut." Those three names are Aruna, Rudra, and Nara. We've already talked about Nara, so let's explore what the other two names represent, starting with Aruna -- a Sanskrit word meaning "dawn" or, more specifically, "the first red rays of the sun breaking through the darkness."

In the Hindu lore and iconography, Aruna drives the chariot of Surya, the sun-god personifying the Greater Light. He represents, therefore, the Holy Power driving the first Red Ray of Creation into the Temple. That first Red Ray is the "Logos," "Divine Idea," or "Thought of God" at the root of our existence. In the dream of separation, that Red Ray still abides within us, as pure and perfect as ever, but in need of "lustration" -- i.e., purification through removal by bathing, washing, or ablution. "Washing away the sins of the world" is another way of saying the same thing.

Or, as Course-Jesus explains so beautifully:

The Thoughts of God are far beyond all change, and shine forever. They await not birth. They wait for welcome and remembering. The Thought God holds of you is like a star, unchangeable in an eternal sky. So high in Heaven is it set that those outside of Heaven know not it is there. Yet still and white and lovely will it shine through all eternity. There was no time it was not there; no instant when its light grew dimmer or less perfect ever was.

Who knows the Father knows this light, for He is the eternal sky that holds it safe, forever lifted up and anchored sure. Its perfect purity does not depend on whether it is seen on earth or not. The sky embraces it and softly holds it in its perfect place, which is as far from earth as earth from Heaven. It is not the distance nor the time that keeps this star invisible to earth. But those who seek for idols cannot know the star is there.

(ACIM, T-30.III.8:1–9:5

  

Surya on his chariot-throne, powered by the seven "lamps" of the Great Rays driven by Aruna -- the first Red Ray of Creation. If we imagine these figures perched atop the Menorah, we get a pretty accurate picture of the trickle-down pecking-order of the at-one-ment powers.

 

The image above depicts Surya, the Hindu sun-god, seated upon his chariot-throne (like Elohim in the Bible and Allah in the Qur'an). Aruna, his driver, holds the reins controlling seven horses drawing the chariot-throne into the lower chambers of the Temple. Symbolically speaking, Surya represents the Spiritual Sun -- the Greater Light of God willing the Sonship's return to wholeness and right-minded creating; Aruna represents the Red Ray of that Sacred Sun shining into the dream to accomplish God's Will; the reins Aruna holds are the "twins of Rudra" -- the chief at-one-ment powers through which the Holy Spirit enacts God's Will on earth; and the horses represent the seven beams, refractions, graces, lamps, or spirits of those twins working together through the Menorah or Lamp of God. 

In this verse, the name or word Aruna is attached to pasa-vah -- a term not to be passed over lightly. Most Sanskrit dictionaries define pasavah rather dismissively as a rope or binding used to secure animals. And pasa or pasha does indeed translate as "bondage" or "fetter." That is, however, only part of the story.

In Shaivism, a Hindu sect devoted to Shiva, Pasa refers to the unbreakable "bond" or "fetter" connecting the Supreme Being (Pati) to the Atman or Soul (Pasu) in the eternally inseparable three-sided Wholeness of Creation. Vah, meanwhile, translates as "to carry, convey, transport, or drive." So, Aruna, the Red Ray's "driver," is the "fetter" binding our Souls (the Lesser Light or Divine Spark) to their Source (the Greater Light or Spiritual Sun). Aruna-pasavah describes, therefore, the Light, Life, Love, and Wholeness binding our Souls eternally to God. And it is by cranking up the radiant power of those inner-facets or "gems" that the Red Ray burns away (from within) the layers of maya blocking the holiness within us. 

Jesus affirms this interpretation in Workbook Lesson 39: My holiness is my salvation, wherein he says (among other noteworthy things):

Your holiness is the answer to every question that was ever asked, is being asked now, or will be asked in the future. Your holiness means the end of guilt, and therefore the end of hell. Your holiness is the salvation of the world, and your own. How could you to whom your holiness belongs be excluded from it? God does not know unholiness. Can it be He does not know His Son? (ACIM, W-39.4:1-6

 Are you keeping up? I hope so, coz we've still got a fair ways to go.

The other name this verse invokes is Rudra (by his code-name "ebhir"), whom the Vedas variously identify as "the Mighty One," "the mightiest of the Mighty," "the Lord of the universe," and "the heart of God." In other Hindu texts, Rudra is identified as Sadashiva, Mahadeva, the Supreme Being, and Paramashiva. All of these designations add up to Rudra being the Purusha, the eternal, indestructible, limitless, formless, all-powerful, and all-pervasive Christ Self running the REAL or spiritual universe underneath the illusion of time, space, and matter. The true definition of the name confirms this. Rudra does NOT mean "the howler," "the roarer," or "the most frightening one," as is often suggested. The name -- a compound of "rud" and "ra" -- more accurately translates as "the source of the radiant All in All." Rudra personifies, therefore, the Light, Presence, and/or Thought of God in everything.

 

Rudra, the head honcho of the spiritual universe, vibrating underneath the forms.

Okay, so ... if Marut (not the Maruts) is indeed identified elsewhere in the Hindu literature as "the son" of Rudra, it's because the first Red Ray of Creation is indeed the "Logos," "Word," or "Son" of God. And, in similar fashion, if Hanuman is indeed identified as the son of Marut, it is because Hanuman represents the "Soul" or "Spark" of the Red Ray embedded within the body.

Makes sense, right?

Before we proceed, I want to say a few words about the Sanskrit word "divah," which should NOT be confused with "diva" (heaven or sky = the Upper World) or "deva" (divine being). Divah is, I'm fairly certain, the Sanskrit word for the holiness or innocence our Souls still possess underneath the false self the ego made.

Or, as Jesus says:

My brother, you are part of God and part of me. When you have at last looked at the ego’s foundation without shrinking you will also have looked upon ours. I come to you from our Father to offer you everything again. Do not refuse it in order to keep a dark cornerstone hidden, for its protection will not save you. I give you the lamp and I will go with you. You will not take this journey alone. I will lead you to your true Father, Who hath need of you, as I have. Will you not answer the Call of Love with joy? (ACIM, T-11.in.4:1-8)   


We're making progress -- and still no sign of any storm-gods. Rv 8.7.8 reads: sṛjanti raśmim ojasā panthāṃ sūryāya yātave te bhān-ubhir vi tasthire. 

Wilson's translation:

They, who by their might open a radiant path for the sun to travel, they pervade (the world) with lustre.

My translation:
To manifest the presence of that first Ray of Light, vigorously follow the path of Surya's chariot (or Holy Riya's song) to liberation. Out of love for us, the Sacred Sun's Spirit (Soma) abides on earth.

My definitions worksheet:

sṛj-anti (to manifest the presence) raśmim (of that first ray of light) ojasā (vigorously) panthāṃ (follow the path of) sūryā-ya (Surya's chariot or Holy Riya's song) yātave (to liberation) te (Out of love for thee/you) bhānubhir (the Sacred Sun) vi (in two parts) tasth-ire (abides on earth).

My Notes:

Let's start with suryaya, which appears to refer to Surya, the sun-god. And that may be so, but the word can also be divided as "su-r(i)ya-ya" to mean Holy Riya's wind, song, or vehicle. The word or name "Riya" has a few different meanings, including "riches," "gem," "graceful," or "singer." More importantly, Riya is a nickname for Lakshmi, the Holy Singer of the Name of God. And that Name, as Course-Jesus explains in Workbook Lesson 184, is the Holy Inheritance we must choose (over worldly treasures) to liberate our Souls from the dream. And this makes perfect sense, given that Lakshmi is indeed the keeper or preserver of that God-given inheritance or Holy Treasure, which can only be recovered inside the Temple.

 

Sri Maa Lakshmi is Riya, the Holy Singer of God's Name

In Hindu iconography, Lakshmi is almost always depicted in a red sari (like Parvati), seated in a lotus, and pouring golden coins from a jug into a bowl or plate in the foreground. Above her on either side, two white elephants shower down Living Water. Together, these symbols suggest that our meditative lustrations bring Lakshmi forward in our consciousness. Those "miracle-showers," in other words, silence the ego chatter drowning out Lakshmi's song. Thus, the more ego noise we allow the Water Ray to mute, the louder we hear Lakshmi singing in our minds.

In the Course, Jesus confirms that the Holy Sprit's voice does indeed grow louder as we increasingly quiet the Ego Mind's chatter. In one place, for example, he says:

The Holy Spirit’s Voice is as loud as your willingness to listen. It cannot be louder without violating your freedom of choice, which the Holy Spirit seeks to restore, never to undermine. (ACIM, T-8.VIII.8:1-8)

All of this indicates that Lakshmi is, in fact, a Blood Ray devi, if not the personified Blood Ray itself, working in the Middle World through the Menorah. And this explains why she 1) always wears red, 2) is respectfully called "Shri," and 3) is often partnered with Narayana. Lakshmi is paired with Narayana, the Water Ray, because she represents Nara, the spark of the Blood Ray in all living things. In modern Hinduism, Vishnu is identified as Narayana because Vishnu is  another form of Prisni and Kamdhenu. And this is why the Hindu pantheon is so bloody over-populated and confounding. 

If Vishnu is indeed the Water Ray, then Sarasvati is his agent. And this explains 1) why Lakshmi and Sarasvati are so frequently pictured together and 2) why Vishnu is partnered with one or the other of these divine forces in different myths. They both work through Vishnu, just as they both work through Lord Ganesh (the Holy Name) in a dynamic and symbiotic three-way partnership.

 
 
The images above and below communicate the same IDEA in different forms. Both images also depict different representations of Rudra and his twins.



 
Let's go back to that first Red Ray of Creation, whose presence we manifest through God's Light and/or Lakshmi's song. As briefly explained earlier, that Ray is the Logos, Word of God, or Divine Idea described in the preamble to the New Testament Gospel of John. That account of "the Creation" and related subsequent events is, in fact, spot-on -- apart from a few editorial manipulations introduced along the way by promoters of the ego's religion. So, let's go through that preamble line by line, so that we're super-clear on whose presence we must bring forward to obtain deliverance. 

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

The same was in the beginning with God.

All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

There was a man sent from God, whose name was John [presumed to be either John the Baptist or the author of this gospel, who was NOT John, the Apostle of Jesus].

The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.

He was not that Light, but he was sent to bear witness to that Light.

That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.

Hold on. Did he just say, "the true Light lighteth every man that cometh into the world"? He did indeed -- and that True Light is the first Red Ray of the Greater Light of God, shining in our dreaming minds as the Lesser Light or Spark to preserve the Word, Name, or Sound of God's first Creative Thought.

He [that Red Ray of God's FIRST Creative Thought] was in the world, and the [real] world was made by him, and the [false] world knew him not.

He came into his own, and his own received him not.

But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the Sons of God, even to them that believe on his Name, which was born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

And the Word [the Red Ray of God's Thought] was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the ONLY begotten of the Father) full of Grace and Truth.

I've capped the word ONLY because it should have been ONE, as per the Latin of the Vulgate, the source of the King James translation. And in that Vulgate, the term was uni-genitus -- the one-begotten of the Father. That uni-genitus is the Word, Logos, or First Red Ray of Agape the God Mind extended to bring the Christ Mind/Creation into being. And, as this Bible verse makes abundantly clear, that Divine Ray, Word, Logos, and/or Holy Thought-vibration is the LIGHT IN ALL MEN (not only Jesus). And that LIGHT empowers all of us to become Sons of God (again, through the Wellspring of Remembrance), while still in the world.

The next line, I believe, was added to identify John as "the Baptist." The message of the preamble is, in fact, much stronger without that throw-away line, which reads: John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, "This was he of whom I spake; He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me." I mean, honestly, who cares? John, by all accounts, was a rabble-rousing aesthetic extremist who got his head lopped off for spouting his vitriolic wrong-minded opinions. 

And of his fullness have all we received, and grace for grace.

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

True enough -- and the Grace and Truth that came by Jesus Christ ARE the twin anointing oils of the atonement, which gained access to the Temple through the historical Jesus's resurrection and ascension. 

To spell it out:

Truth = the radiant power of the Truth of our Being = the Blood Ray

Grace = the force of God's Will for our return to sanity = the Water Ray 

Before we move on, I want to call attention to two particular lines in this verse. The first is the one reading, "And of his fullness have all we received, and grace for grace." Like most of the rest of this verse, this line refers to the Red Ray -- the Lifeblood God "breathed" into the Sonship -- rather than to Jesus specifically. We have all received the fullness of the Thought of God we truly are (that eternal Star shining down from Heaven) -- along with all the graces or heavenly treasures accompanying that Holy Thought. To receive that fullness and those many graces, however, we have to honor that version of our Self, rather than the imposter "I-am-ness" the Ego Mind manufactured to hide the Truth of our Being.

The other fragment I want to examine more closely reads, "even to them that believe on his Name, which was born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." More particularly, I want to explore the deeper meanings of three words within this fragment. Those three words are "believe," "his," and "Name."

In the original Greek, the word translated as "believe" was pisteuw, which means "have faith in," "trust in," or "commit to." Compared to these definitions, "believe" is rather passive, don't you think? I mean, to merely "believe" in something isn't quite the same as investing in or committing to that belief. You can, for example, "believe" Jesus Christ is your "savior" -- and pay lip-service to that belief -- without actually devoting your life to following his example and teachings.

Let's now examine the Greek word translated as "his." That word was autos, which means "Self," "one's own Self," or "the same Self." A bit more on-point than "his," wouldn't you say?

Finally, the Greek word translated as "Name" was onoma. Jesus, in fact, used the word onoma forty-seven times in the New Testament. The Greek word doesn't refer only to the "word-name" we were given by our parents or answer to in the world. Onoma much more broadly encompasses a person's full identity -- the full spectrum of ideas that name not only embodies, but also arouses when called to mind or spoken by anyone and everyone. 

So, "believe in his Name" is, in fact, a very anemic way of conveying what the author of this gospel actually wrote, which is closer in sprit to this: Commit wholeheartedly to identifying with the Self shared by and embodying everything of God's creation in the universe.

As the scribe also tells us, that Name, Word, Self, or Ray was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the ONE-begotten of the Father -- the WHOLE SONSHIP, fettered together by the Red Ray) full of Grace and Truth. And that ONE shone fully from within the person of Jesus of Nazareth, to bear witness to or EXEMPLIFY what we all MUST come to believe and strive to BE to escape the dream of hell.

Or, as Jesus very importantly explains in the Course:

If you want to be like me I will help you, knowing that we are alike. If you want to be different, I will wait until you change your mind. I can teach you, but only you can choose to listen to my teaching. How else can it be, if God’s Kingdom is freedom? Freedom cannot be learned by tyranny of any kind, and the perfect equality of all God’s Sons cannot be recognized through the dominion of one mind over another. God’s Sons are equal in will, all being the Will of their Father. This is the only lesson I came to teach. (ACIM, T-8.IV.6:1-9

 



Let's proceed to Rv 8.7.9, which reads: imām me maruto giram imaṃ stomam ṛbhukṣaṇaḥ imam me vanatā havam.

Wilson's translation:

Accept, Maruts, this my praise, (accept), mighty ones, this my adoration, (accept) this my invocation.

My translation:

These two (rays of the Greater Light) restore the first Red Ray of Creation's vibratory voice; these two assemble the multitudes in the shared interest of remembering the Holy Instant; these two restore the desire for the Supreme Lord's communications.

My definitions worksheet:

imām (These two) me (restore) maruto (the first Red Ray of Creation's) giram (vibratory voice); imaṃ (these two) stomam (assemble the multitudes in the shared interest of) ṛbhu-kṣaṇaḥ (remembering the auspicious moment or Holy Instant) imam (these two) me (restore) vanata (longing for) ha-vam (the Supreme Lord's communications)

My notes:

Before we wade into the grammatical minutia, let me share two things. The first is from the gospel of Matthew (4:4), wherein Jesus says: "It is written that man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God." Because that is essentially what this verse attempts to communicate. 

The second is from the Course's Text, wherein Jesus says: 

I have said already that I can reach up and bring the Holy Spirit down to you, but I can bring Him to you only at your own invitation. The Holy Spirit is in your right mind, as He was in mine. The Bible says, “May the mind be in you that was also in Christ Jesus,” and uses this as a blessing. It is the blessing of miracle-mindedness. It asks that you may think as I thought, joining with me in Christ thinking. (ACIM, T-5.I.3:2-6

As to the minutia ... nowhere could I find a credible definition for imam -- but it definitely doesn't mean "it," as most Sanskrit grammarians presume. So, I improvised with an "it-like" reference back to the subject of the previous verse. Ditto for stomam, which most linguists erroneously define as "songs of praise" or "eulogium."

The most interesting word in this verse is rbhuksanah, which is generally defined as "Indra's thunderbolt." And that may be accurate, if Indra's thunderbolt represents the Holy Instant discussed at length in the Course. And based on Helen Schucman's vision of meeting Jesus at the Inner-Altar, that seems more than plausible. As used herein, the word is a compound of rbhu and ksanah  --  and ksanah does indeed mean "Holy Instant." Oh yes, the Rig Veda does mention the Holy Instant. In this Rik alone, that dream-ending now-moment of eternity is, in fact, referenced several times.

This brings us to rbhu, which I've translated as "remembering" because that is the definition that makes the most sense here. Rbhu also is the name of a demi-god appearing in the Hindu lore. He is one of three demi-gods, in fact, collectively called "the Rbhus." These three "brothers" are named Rbhu, Vibhu or Vibharan, and Vaja. According to the Puranic lore, it is they who "built" the atonement infrastructure. Related to Tvashta (the divine artisan who created Indra's Vajra, the twin axes of Brahspati wielded by Soma/Agni, and the  chalice of redemption), the Rbhus were human beings who achieved or returned to immortality by completing the requirements of the at-one-ment curriculum (thereby "reaching God directly").

Based on my research into the lore and the meaning of their names, these three "builders" represent the nine chief at-one-ment powers. Rbhu, whose name means "the sound of becoming," is the Water Ray; Vibhu, "the all-pervading one," is the Blood Ray; and Vaja represents the seven graces of the Holy Spirit working through the Temple Menorah. 

Apparently, the Rbhus are "lauded" in eleven different Rig Veda Suktas, and also mentioned in a few others dedicated to the Vishvedevas. This makes sense, given that the Vishvedevas are, in actuality, the "stars," "sparks," "Souls," or "devas" in all of us (rather than external "gods"). The verses devoted to the Rbhus typically extol the five-fold achievements that earned them immortality and, according to suspect translations, "the right to the Soma-libation."

The Soma-libation is, of course, the Miracle of the Course, while the five-fold feats of the Rbhus (followed by my seat-of-the-pants decryptions) are/were: 1) reviving a dying cow (enlivening the ego-muted Om vibration); 2) transforming their old and dying parents into persons full of youthful vigor and strength (creating reproduction and reincarnation to help Souls learn to parent and improve their Karmic records); 3) making two horses for Indra (bringing down the twin thought-forces of God's Will for our salvation); 4) building a complex chariot for the Asvins (building the Temple and its components for the Great Rays); and 5) making four camasas (drinking vessels for the atonement) out of one (making four levels or steps for undoing the Ego Mind's enthrallment).


The Rik's next line (Rv 8.7.10) reads: trīṇi sarāṃsi pṛśnayo duduhre vajriṇe madhu utsaṃ kavandham udriṇam. 

Wilson's translation:

The kine have filled for the thunderer three lakes of the sweet (Soma) from the dripping water-bearing cloud

My translation (sans cattle):

To overcome guilt (or debt), come together to share in accomplishing the lustration drawing out the Vajra-holder's sweet wine of truth elevating the Wholeness the Kavandha identity split apart.

My definitions worksheet:

tr-rīṇi (to overcome guilt or Karmic debt) sar-āṃsi (come together to share in) pṛ-śnayo (accomplishing the lustration) duduh-re (drawing out) vajriṇe (the Vajra-holder's) madhu (sweet wine of truth) ut-saṃ (elevating the wholeness) kavandha-nam (the Kavandha-identity) udriṇam (split apart)

My notes: 

Lots to decode here, so let's start with vajrine, which means "the Vajra holder" or "the one who bears the Vajra." In the Hindu lore, the Vajra is the thunderbolt-throwing weapon fashioned for Lord Indra, the king of the gods, by Tvashta, the artisan god. So, Vajrine probably refers to the one who grants the Holy Instant and/or "direct revelation" of God -- the final step in the reawakening process. If I'm right about this, the Vajrine referenced herein is the Holy Spirit.

The three reservoirs of water are, I believe the three right-hand branches of the Menorah, down which the Living Water flows into the central channel housing Yama and Yami. I'm still trying to understand exactly how the Menorah works, so I'll leave it there for now.

 

This temple painting shows Rama and Lakshmana seated on Kabandha's arms, about to sever them. Kabandha is depicted with a big mouth on his stomach and no head or neck; though depicted with two eyes, he is described in the Ramayana as one-eyed (suggesting ego-myopia, presumably).

Let's turn now to Kavandha or Kabandha -- the demonic headless blue torso depicted in the temple painting above. The story of Kabandha is told in both the Mahabharata and Ramayana epics. According to those highly symbolic fables, Kabandha started out as an immortal Gandharva (a celestial musician) named Visvavasu before a curse turned him into a headless, gluttonous, greedy, and lustful demon. After happening upon Kabandha, Rama (the Om or Water Ray) and Lakshman (the Soul of Blood Ray) severed his arms before proceeding to burn his body. Once dead, Kabandha resumed his Gandharva form, after which he helped Rama rescue his wife from her demon captors.

Interestingly, the plot of Kabandha's story is remarkably similar to Hanuman's -- except that Hanuman becomes super-human, while Kabandha is destroyed. This tells me, at least, that Hanuman represents the Soul imprisoned in the body, while Kabandha represents the ego-body persona the Soul must overcome to escape the dream. 

Both legends are, of course, the story of our fall from and restoration to the pure state of grace we enjoyed before our "demonization" by the Ego Mind. Before being cursed, Kabandha was an immortal Gandharva. He could, in other words, both hear and heal through the vibratory Word or Name of God. After being cursed, he lost his head -- i.e., his capacity for Higher Reason. Thereafter, he lived through his stomach -- the epicenter of egoic I-am-ness, creative willing, and physical appetites. Why did Rama and his brother sever the demon's arms? To prevent him, I suspect, from acquiring by grasping or taking on the physical plane -- the Ego Mind's method of getting or gaining possessions, grandiosity, and/or prosperity. And, once the twin Rays burned up his headless, armless demon body (i.e., burned away his ego-body identity), Kabandha resumed his previous status as an immortal celestial musician called, not insignificantly, Vi-sva-va-su, which translates (more or less) as "the Spirit of one's own Self radiating holiness."


Lots to absorb in these nine verses, so let's break here. I can't be certain my translations and interpretations are 100 percent accurate, but I'm doing my level best (and revising as new insights occur). This whole article, in fact, took several months to prepare -- and we've still got plenty more ahead. So, until we meet again outside the Golden Circle, Om Shanti Om, Namaste, and God Bless.