Showing posts with label Soma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soma. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Shining New Light on the Rig Veda (Part 2): Who or what are the Asvina?



I first drafted this post back in February, after taking a few weeks off from blogging. Why did I take a break? Mainly because I felt no compulsion to carry on. In hindsight, I can see that my lack of motivation was tied to my reluctance to continue translating the Rig Veda. Who am I, after all, to take on such an assignment? In the world's estimation, I am utterly unqualified, having no formal training in Sanskrit, Vedic studies, or Hindu philosophy.

And yet, as Jesus often reminds me in moments of doubt, those professing expertise in these areas have led us all astray for centuries, so perhaps a different form of "expertise" is needed at this point in the dream of time and space. 

During my hiatus from blogging, I continued my daily Golden Circle meetings and also prayed for guidance by invoking the miracle-readiness prayer from the Course: "Tell me what you would have me do, and only that do I will to do."

The answers I requested came not in words or signs, but more subtly. Whenever I sat down at the computer to write new material or rework archival posts unrelated to the Rig Veda, I floundered. My mind just spun until I finally gave up.

This went on, as I said, for several weeks, which was frustrating, to say the least. When I'm not blogging, I feel somewhat rudderless -- even when I meditate several times in a 24-hour period. During my unrestful vacation from blogging, I wrestled within myself. Was the Holy Spirit compelling me, strange as it seemed, to translate the Rig Veda? Was it, in fact, my special assignment in the Atonement Plan to shine new light on that ancient text?

As I prayed for clarity, I began to see that it might indeed be God's Will that I continue this work. I also sensed that it was precisely my lack of ego-defined "expertise" that made me so right for the job. Simply stated, I have no prejudicial assumptions or cherished false beliefs to overcome where the Vedas are concerned. I am, you might say, a pure channel when it comes to Hinduism in general and the Rig Veda in particular. I also seem to understand the Course's teachings at a higher level than most people promoting the path in this phase of the dream. And that seems key in ways that aren't easy to explain.

Despite all this, I still harbored doubts. Then, while reading the Course, I came across this "answer" in Workbook Lesson 186: Salvation of the world depends on me

Let us not fight our function. We did not establish it. It is not our idea. The means are given us by which it will be perfectly accomplished. All that we are asked to do is to accept our part in genuine humility and not deny with self-deceiving arrogance that we are worthy. What is given us to do we have the strength to do. Our minds are suited perfectly to take the part assigned to us by One Who knows us well. 

Yes, but. As on-point as this message seemed to be, I remained unconvinced. So, I sat down and meditated a good long while. And when I was deep enough, I asked again if doing this work was indeed God's Will. The little voice that sometimes speaks to me answered thusly: "Just as the Course came into the world to correct erroneous Christian beliefs, retranslating the Rig Veda will help do the same for Hinduism."

"Yes, but," I again replied, "I'm not Hindu."

"Aren't you?" my inner guide coyly inquired. "Aren't you, in fact, everything? Aren't you, in actuality, the Christ? And doesn't that make you as much a Hindu, Christian, and everything else as anybody else?"

"Well, yes," I reluctantly agreed, "when you put it that way ...."

The voice then added reassuringly, "Don't worry about getting through the whole Samhita. Just concentrate for now on translating the first Mandala -- and see how it goes."

That didn't sound so bad -- until I discovered the first Mandala contains 190 Suktas! And at 65, that's a pretty tall order. So, I'd better get on with it -- and see what I can learn and teach from the third Rik, which (as per Max Muller) reads as follows in transliterated Sanskrit:

aśvinā yajvarīr iṣo dravatpāṇī śubhas patī | purubhujā canasyatam ||
aśvinā purudaṃsasā narā śavīrayā dhiyā | dhiṣṇyā vanataṃ giraḥ ||
dasrā yuvākavaḥ sutā nāsatyā vṛktabarhiṣaḥ | ā yātaṃ rudravartanī ||
indrā yāhi citrabhāno sutā ime tvāyavaḥ | aṇvībhis tanā pūtāsaḥ ||
indrā yāhi dhiyeṣito viprajūtaḥ sutāvataḥ | upa brahmāṇi vāghataḥ ||
indrā yāhi tūtujāna upa brahmāṇi harivaḥ | sute dadhiṣva naś canaḥ ||
omāsaś carṣaṇīdhṛto viśve devāsa ā gata | dāśvāṃso dāśuṣaḥ sutam ||
viśve devāso apturaḥ sutam ā ganta tūrṇayaḥ | usrā iva svasarāṇi ||
viśve devāso asridha ehimāyāso adruhaḥ | medhaṃ juṣanta vahnayaḥ ||
pāvakā naḥ sarasvatī vājebhir vājinīvatī | yajñaṃ vaṣṭu dhiyāvasuḥ ||
codayitrī sūnṛtānāṃ cetantī sumatīnām | yajñaṃ dadhe sarasvatī ||
maho arṇaḥ sarasvatī pra cetayati ketunā | dhiyo viśvā vi rājati ||


Before I walk you through my seat-of-the-pants translation process, let's fix in our minds (for frame-of-reference purposes) what the 19th-Century Oxford "orientalists" H. H. Wilson and Ralph T. H. Griffith came up with. We'll start with Wilson, who offers the following result:

Aśvins, cherishers of pious acts, long-armed, accept with outstretched hands the sacrificial viands

Aśvins, abounding in mighty acts, guides (of devotion), endowed with fortitude, listen with unaverted minds to our praises

Aśvins, destroyers of foes, exempt from untruth, leaders in the van of heroes, come to the mixed libations sprinkled on the lopped sacred grass.

Indra, apprehended by the understanding and appreciated by the wise, approach and accept the prayers of the priest as he offers the libation.

Fleet Indra with the tawny coursers, come hither to the prayer (of the priest), and in this libation accept our (proffered) food.

Universal Gods, protectors and supporters of men, bestowers (of rewards) come to the libation of the worshipper.

May the swift-moving universal Gods, the shedders of rain, come to the libation, as the solar rays come diligently to the days.

May the universal Gods, who are exempt from decay, omniscient, devoid of malice, and bearers of (riches), accept the sacrifice.

May Sarasvatī, the purifier, the bestower of food, the recompenser of worship with wealth, be attracted by our offered viands to our rite.

Sarasvatī, the inspirer of those who delight in truth, the instrumental uctress of the right-minded, has accepted our sacrifice.

Sarasvatī, makes manifest by her acts a mighty river, and (in her own form) enlightens all understandings.


And here's what Griffith made of the same ancient verbiage:

Ye Aśvins, rich in wondrous deeds, ye heroes worthy of our praise, Accept our songs with mighty thought. Accept the sacrificial food.

Nāsatyas, wonder-workers, yours are these libations with clipt grass: Come ye whose paths are red with flame.

O Indra marvellously bright, come, these libations long for thee, Thus by fine fingers purified. Urged by the holy singer, sped by song, come, Indra, to the prayers, Of the libation-pouring priest.

Approach, O Indra, hasten thee, Lord of Bay Horses, to the prayers. In our libation take delight.

Ye Viśvedevas, who protect, reward, and cherish men, approach Your worshipper's drink-offering.

Ye Viśvedevas, swift at work, come hither quickly to the draught, as milch-kine hasten to their stalls.

The Viśvedevas, changing shape like serpents, fearless, void of guile, Bearers, accept the sacred draught.

Wealthy in spoil, enriched with hymns, may bright Sarasvatī desire, with eager love, our sacrifice. Inciter of all pleasant songs, inspirer of all gracious thought, Sarasvatī accept our rite.

Sarasvatī, the mighty flood, —she with her light illuminates. She brightens every pious thought.


Let's now go through the third Sukta line by line, word by word, and/or syllable by syllable, as needed. The first word is aśvinā, which both Wilson and Griffith translate as the proper name of the twin gods supposedly being addressed. But is that right? -- or does aśvinā have an entirely different and much more elucidating meaning?


The Ashvins or Aswins, as commonly depicted in Hindu iconography.

According to the online dictionaries I consulted, aśvinā can mean "pervading," "the distance traveled in a day by a horse," "horseman," "rider," and/or "the seventh month in the lunar calendar." So, what the rishis are really talking about here are the metaphorical horses seen and described by the Biblical prophets Zechariah and John the Elder. Those horses are, in fact, thought-forces or "shaktis" sent forth by the four Living Beings to help us overcome the false beliefs and faulty denials blocking our spiritual vision. And it is, in fact, the chief Anti-Christ himself who transformed these four "Shaktis of Enlightenment" into "apocalyptical" forces of destruction to be feared and avoided.

The four "Horsemen of the Apocalypse" as typically depicted in Christian art.

Like the first two Suktas, the third is a teaching rather than a hymn of praise. By my calculations, the opening line translates more or less as follows: 

The Horses of God strengthen the thoughts setting in motion the Vishwapurusha's streaming song bringing forth the rays of the Bridegroom's everlasting arms reaching out to everything belonging to God.

aśvin-ā (the Horses of God) yajvarir (strengthen the thoughts setting in motion) iṣo (the Vishwapurusha or Holy Spirit's) dravat-pani (streaming song or water) subhas (bringing forth the rays) pati (of the Bridegroom's) puru-bhuja (everlasting arms) canasyatam (reaching out to everything belonging to God)

Beautifully stated, isn't it? And yes, we WILL discuss the four horsemen in more depth before we're through. For now, though, let's focus on the everlasting arms mentioned herein, as well as in the Bible and the Course. In the Bible, the arms are described as follows in Deuteronomy 33:27-28:

The eternal God is thy refuge; and underneath are the everlasting arms: And he shall thrust out the enemy from before thee; And shall say, 'Destroy them.' Israel then shall dwell in safety alone: The fountain of Jacob shall be upon a land of corn and wine; Also his heavens shall drop down dew.

Actually, this is pretty profound, as well as prophetic. Here's what it means: God is our eternal refuge in the heavenly sphere, and down below (in the dream) we are supported by the everlasting arms of the Vishwapurusha, which will thrust out the Ego Mind by teaching us to destroy the alien thought system we manifested in fear and rebellion. Israel -- the truth-seeking Sons of God in the dream -- will then dwell in safety "alone." They will, in other words, live in the Holy Relationship within their minds at the fountain or wellspring, where they will be at peace until God lifts them out of the dream. That "the heavens shall drop down dew" means, more or less, that the Holy Spirit will continue to rain down Living Water on the earthly desert until the last dreamer awakens. And, in case you doubt me, Course-Jesus says pretty much the same thing below: 

The holy relationship reflects the true relationship the Son of God has with his Father in reality. The Holy Spirit rests within it in the certainty it will endure forever. Its firm foundation is eternally upheld by truth, and love shines on it with the gentle smile and tender blessing it offers to its own. Here the unholy instant is exchanged in gladness for the holy one of safe return. Here is the way to true relationships held gently open, through which you and your brother walk together, leaving the body thankfully behind and resting in the Everlasting Arms. Love’s Arms are open to receive you, and give you peace forever. (ACIM, T-20.VI.10:1-6)


The monumental statue of "Christ the Redeemer" in Brazil symbolizes the everlasting arms of God's Love, reaching out to receive us and carry us home. For our redemption, in other words, God's Perfect Love divided into the twin Great Rays of Peace and Joy.


Let's proceed to the second line of the third Sukta, which reads: aśvinā purudaṃsasā narā śavīrayā dhiyā dhiṣṇyā vanataṃ giraḥ

The Horses of God bring forward awareness of the reality of Nara, the radiant current illuminating the wellspring of God's Voice.

asvina (the Horses of God) puru-damsasa (bring forward awareness of the reality of) nara (Nara, the Red Ray of Peace) savi-raya (the radiant current) dhiya (enlightening or illuminating) vana-tam (the fountain or wellspring of God's) girah (Voice).

The word "purudamsa" is generally written off as a epithet for the Asvins, but the word actually tells us the horsemen bring forward ("puru") awareness of the reality ("damasa") of Nara, the eternal spirit, holy lamp, and/or Red Ray of Peace "enlightening" or "illuminating" the wellspring of God's Voice. And that Voice emanates from Narayana, the Water Ray of Joy.

If you are doing the Course, be aware that it is these two Great Rays to which Jesus refers whenever he mentions God's gifts of Peace and Joy, as he does quite often. In Workbook Lesson 107: I seek but what belongs to me in truth, he says the following about these two radiant beams of Perfect Love:

Today’s idea continues with the thought that joy and peace are not but idle dreams. They are your right, because of what you are. They come to you from God, Who cannot fail to give you what He wills. Yet must there be a place made ready to receive His gifts. They are not welcomed gladly by a mind that has instead received the gifts it made where His belong, as substitutes for them. (ACIM, W-104.1:1-5)

And it is "bringing forward awareness of the reality of Nara" that Course-Jesus stridently encourages in Workbook Lesson 185 (I want the peace of God). Bringing forward that Red Ray of Peace is, in fact, the only purpose of earthly life, as Jesus makes clear in Workbook Lesson 205 (a review of Lesson 185), in which he provides the following prayer to help with that all-important task:

The peace of God is everything I want. The peace of God is my one goal; the aim of all my living here, the end I seek, my purpose and my function and my life, while I abide where I am not at home. (ACIM, W-205.1:2-3)


Let's move on to the Rik's third line, which reads: dasrā yuvākavaḥ sutā nāsatyā vṛktabarhiṣaḥ ā yātaṃ rudravartanī. My research and guidance suggests those words translate thusly:

To perceive this radiant driver of the eternal Word of God conveying the holy sound of the song of Satya (Divine Truth or Reality), subdue the thoughts injuring the Supreme Self abiding in Rudra.

das-ra (to perceive this radiant) yu-vak-a-vah (driver of the eternal word of God conveying) suta (the holy sound) nasatya (of the song of Satya or Divine Truth) vr (subdue) kta (the thoughts) barh (injuring) isah (the Supreme Self) Rudra-vartani (abiding in Rudra)

Who is Rudra? Good question, because the Rig Veda doesn't make his identity all that clear (at this point in our journey, leastwise). He is referred to elsewhere as "the mightiest of the mighty," so, we can presume Rudra also represents the deific force described by the Vedic scribes as "the Mighty One." Based on several factors, I believe Lord Rudra personifies the Solar Logos, Spiritual Sun, and/or first Red Ray of Creation occupying the chariot-throne on the Seventh Plane of Consciousness. That the name "Rudra" (rud-ra) translates as "red radiance" or "red ray" bears this out.

The image above depicts Rudra blessing the Living Water that is the Om/Aum vibration and/or Song of Heaven, as it flows downward into the Temple of the Vishwapurusha. In his thoughts, Lord Shiva -- Christ the redeemer -- looms large. At his back stand Rama (the Soul-Mind) and the monkey-faced god, Hanuman or Maruti.

Let's move on to the Sukta's fourth line, which reads: indrā yāhi citrabhāno sutā ime tvāyavaḥ aṇvībhis tanā pūtāsaḥ. By my calculations, those words translate along these lines:

The Supreme Eternal Power of that radiance extends to impel the Bright One (Chitra or Chitra-gupa) to resound the answer to the call, the holy song of the Purusha -- the one in two parts restoring the Soul-Mind to Wholeness, purified of chaos, disorder, and the dark side of human nature.

Ind-ra [the supreme power (ind) of that radiance (ra)] yahi (shelters) citra-bhan-o (the Bright One resounding the "o" = the answer to the call) suta (the holy sound) ime (of the Purusha) tva-v-avah (the one in two parts restoring)  anvi-bhis (the soul-mind) tana (to Wholeness) pu-tasah = pu-dasah [purified or cleansed (pu) of chaos, disorder, and the dark side of human nature (dasah)].

 

Chitra-gupa, as depicted in Hinduism

In Hinduism, Chitra or Chitra-gupa is the keeper of "the Record" -- the register of our thoughts identified as the Agrasandhani in the Puranic lore. Basically, he's the deva who, like Santa Claus, "knows when you are sleeping; knows when you're awake; and knows if you've been bad or good." He's also the one who determines -- based on our spiritual progress and accumulated "debts" at the end of each incarnation -- our grade-level placement in our next earthly life.

Personally, I think Chitra-gupa is more than just a record-keeper, because his name also means "hidden picture" or "rich in secrets." Moreover, he's associated with the mysterious "blue pearl" -- the spiritual moon inside the Golden Circle with the bright star in the center. That ethereal "blue moon," I'm fairly certain, represents the Sixth Plane of Christ-Consciousness. Based on all these factors, my gut tells me Chitra-gupa represents what Course-Jesus calls "the face of Christ." Jesus mentions "the face of Christ" many times in the Course -- too many times to quote all his references. So, I picked the one below, which tends to support my theory that this is indeed what Chitra-gupa represents:

This is the purpose given you. Think not that your forgiveness of your brother serves but you two alone. For the whole new world rests in the hands of every two who enter here to rest. And as they rest, the face of Christ shines on them and they remember the laws of God, forgetting all the rest and yearning only to have His laws perfectly fulfilled in them and all their brothers. Think you when this has been achieved that you will rest without them? You could no more leave one of them outside than I could leave you, and forget part of myself. (ACIM, T-20.IV.7:1-6)


Let's proceed to the Sukta's fifth line, which reads: Indrā yāhi dhiyeṣito viprajūtaḥ sutāvataḥ upa brahmāṇi vāghataḥ. In my estimation, those words translate more or less as follows:

That Supreme Radiance extends to impel the Soul-Mind to extend the two driving the seven-fold holy sound of God's Voice nearer to Brahmani and away from body identification.

Indra (that supreme radiance) yahi (extends to impel) dhi-yes-ito [the soul-mind (dhiyes) to extend (ito)] viprajutah [the two (vi) driving (praju) the seven-fold (tah)] suta-vatah (holy sound of God's Voice) upa (nearer to) Brahmani (Brahmani) vaghatah [and away from (va) body-identification (ghatah)]

 

In current Hindu ideology, Brahmani is correctly identified as a form of Sarasvati -- and incorrectly identified as one of the Sapta Matrikas -- the seven auspicious mothers oft-mentioned in the Vedas. Said to be an aspect of Adi Shakti (the Spirit of Grace), Brahmani also is associated, rightly or wrongly, with the Rajas Guna -- the "mode of being" focused on human passions and bodily "doing." As such, she is wrongly identified as the "shakti" of Brahma, the creator of the world of bodies and action. In actuality, Brahmani and/or Sarasvati, if indeed the two are the same, represent the Great Ocean or Ocean of Milk (as we will learn in a later verse of this Sukta). She is, therefore, God's answer to or cure for the Rajas mode of being, as this verse makes clear. 


Let's move on to the sixth line, which reads (contrary to Muller's construction): indrā yāhi tūtujāna upa brahmāṇi harivaḥ sute dadhiṣva. 

That Supreme Eternal Radiance extends to impel persons of activity (those accumulating karmic debt in the Record) to move nearer to Brahmani to be fit to convey the holiness granting knowledge of one's own Higher Self or Soul.

Indra (That supreme eternal radiance) vahi (extends to impel) tutujana (persons of activity) upa (to move nearer to) Brahmani (Brahmani) havivah (to be fit to convey) sute (the holiines) dadhisva [granting (da) knowledge of (dhi) one's own Higher Self or Soul (sva)]

Like I said, Brahmani isn't Brahma's "shakti"; she's the Ocean of Milk, Brahma's antithesis.

Galloping onward, the Sukta's restored seventh line -- naś canaḥ omāsaś carṣaṇīdhṛto viśve devāsa ā gata dāśvāṃso dāśuṣaḥ sutam -- translates along these lines:

Uniting to sound the Wholeness touching the wheel at the heart of the cosmos protecting the authority of God, proceeding from the white horseman of Soma, bestows vital spiritual energy on the Sonship.

Nas (Uniting) ca-nah (to sound the Wholeness) omasas (touching) carsanidhrto (the wheel at the heart) visve (of the cosmos) de-vasa (protecting the authority) a (of God) gata (proceeding from) dasvam-so (the white horse or horseman of Soma) da-su-sah (bestows vital spiritual energy) sutam (on the Sonship)

Let's begin with the wheel at the heart of the cosmos -- a concept that, like the Golden Egg, can be found in scriptural texts universally. If you'd like to know more, there's a reasonably comprehensive explanation of "the wheel" on the website for the Theosophy Memorial Trust. I can't, of course, be sure that carsanidhrto actually translates as "the wheel at the heart," but I'm confident I'm on the right track. In the Course, Jesus never uses the word "wheel" -- not even once, oddly enough. He does, however, mention the "circle of brightness" incorporating the Real World. And what he says about this circle resonates strongly with this ancient Vedic verse. So, I've shared a goodly chunk of that explanation below:

This world of light, this circle of brightness is the real world, where guilt meets with forgiveness. Here the world outside is seen anew, without the shadow of guilt upon it. Here are you forgiven, for here you have forgiven everyone. Here is the new perception, where everything is bright and shining with innocence, washed in the waters of forgiveness, and cleansed of every evil thought you laid upon it. Here there is no attack upon the Son of God, and you are welcome. Here is your innocence, waiting to clothe you and protect you, and make you ready for the final step in the journey inward. Here are the dark and heavy garments of guilt laid by, and gently replaced by purity and love.

Yet even forgiveness is not the end. Forgiveness does make lovely, but it does not create. It is the source of healing, but it is the messenger of love and not its Source. Here you are led, that God Himself can take the final step unhindered, for here does nothing interfere with love, letting it be itself. A step beyond this holy place of forgiveness, a step still further inward but the one you cannot take, transports you to something completely different. Here is the Source of light; nothing perceived, forgiven nor transformed. But merely known.

This course will lead to knowledge, but knowledge itself is still beyond the scope of our curriculum. Nor is there any need for us to try to speak of what must forever lie beyond words. We need remember only that whoever attains the real world, beyond which learning cannot go, will go beyond it, but in a different way. Where learning ends there God begins, for learning ends before Him Who is complete where He begins, and where there IS no end. It is not for us to dwell on what cannot be attained. There is too much to learn. The readiness for knowledge still must be attained.

Love is not learned. Its meaning lies within itself. And learning ends when you have recognized all it is NOT. That is the interference; that is what needs to be undone. Love is not learned, because there never was a time in which you knew it not. Learning is useless in the Presence of your Creator, Whose acknowledgment of you and yours of Him so far transcend all learning that everything you learned is meaningless, replaced forever by the knowledge of love and its one meaning.

Your relationship with your brother has been uprooted from the world of shadows, and its unholy purpose has been safely brought through the barriers of guilt, washed with forgiveness, and set shining and firmly rooted in the world of light. From there it calls to you to follow the course it took, lifted high above the darkness and gently placed before the gates of Heaven. The holy instant in which you and your brother were united is but the messenger of love, sent from beyond forgiveness to remind you of all that lies beyond it. Yet it is through forgiveness that it will be remembered.

And when the memory of God has come to you in the holy place of forgiveness you will remember nothing else, and memory will be as useless as learning, for your only purpose will be creating. Yet this you cannot know until every perception has been cleansed and purified, and finally removed forever. Forgiveness removes only the untrue, lifting the shadows from the world and carrying it, safe and sure within its gentleness, to the bright world of new and clean perception. There is your purpose NOW. And it is there that peace awaits you.

Let's turn now to "the white horseman of Soma" -- if indeed my translation of "davam-so" has merit. It seems probable, given the earlier mentions of the Asvina. In the Holy Bible, that same SYMBOLIC horse is seen and described by both Zechariah and John the Elder, the author of the Book of Revelation. So, let's see what each can tell us about this horse or horseman. Not coincidentally, the references to the white horse appear in chapter six of both biblical books.

In Chapter 6 of the Old Testament Book Zechariah, we are told the following:

And I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came four chariots out from between two mountains; and the mountains were mountains of brass.

In the first chariot, were red horses; and in the second chariot black horses; And in the third chariot white horses; and in the fourth chariot grisled and bay horses.

Then I answered and said unto the angel that talked with me, "What are these, my lord?"

And the angel answered and said unto me, "These are the four spirits of the heavens, which go forth from standing before the Lord of all the earth."

The black horses, which are therein, go forth into the north country; and the white go forth after them; and the grisled go forth toward the south country. And the bay went forth, and sought to go that they might walk to and fro through the earth: and he said, "Get you hence, walk to and fro through the earth." So they walked to and fro through the earth.

Then cried he upon me, and spake unto me, saying, "Behold, these [the white horses] that go toward the north country have quieted my spirit in the north country."

From this uncorrected account we learn that 1) the horses represent the "four spirits of the heavens before the throne"; 2) the white horses occupy the third chariot; 3) the white horses follow the black horses into the north country; and 4) the white horses "quieted the spirit" or "gave rest to the Souls" in the north country.

Let's now see if the Book of Revelations can shed any more light on the mystery of the four horsemen. In the King James translation, the first verse of Chapter 6 reads:

And when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see. And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.

Let's reject that translation of John's vision, because God's messengers NEVER instill fear. When translated from the original Greek with more sensitivity, the verse reads more like this:

And I perceived a lamb open the first seal of a signet ring, also listening as a thunder-voice came out from among the four Living Creatures to say, "Come and look, and envision brightly, a horse, and to be the Self seated upon the same, and to have the bow (a symbol representing the covenant of the Holy Relationship between God and His Creations) and the encircling glory, and to give them to go forth and be strong and to overcome." 

Miles apart, actually. And I hope I'm making my point about foolishly investing faith in or defending unilluminated translations and/or fear-shaded interpretations of scriptural texts and symbols. The Holy Spirit NEVER seeks to frighten us, because scaring us is antithetical to his mission.

Let's proceed to the second verse, which reads as follows in the King James Bible:

And when he had opened the second seal, I heard the second beast say, "Come and see." And there went out another horse that was red: and (power) was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword.

Translated from the original Greek, the verse actually reads more along these lines:

And when [the lamb] opened the second seal of the signet ring, I heard the second Living Creature say to come and to look and to go out on another horse, fire-colored, and to give to the Self to be seated thereupon to receive rest away from the earth, for the purpose of offering forgiveness ("sphazo," in Greek) in reciprocal relationship to give to the Self the Great Word of God ("machiara," in Greek).

Let's start with the Greek word "sphazo," which has come to mean "slay" or "slaughter" in the same way that the Sanskrit word "yajna" has come to mean "fire sacrifice."  "Sphazo" originally meant "offering forgiveness" or "offering the atonement," but the Ego Mind twisted the word's true meaning until, in Biblical times, it came to signify "slaughtering animals for the purpose of ritual blood sacrifices." By the early 1500s, when the Anglicans translated the New Testament into English, the word "sphazo" had come to mean "slaying" or "slew."

Thus, when John the Baptist said, in the gospel of John, that  Jesus came into the world for the purpose of "sphazo," he meant his cousin came to offer the atonement to God's earthbound children. John did NOT mean Jesus came to be slaughtered like an animal in sacrifice for our sins. And anyone who says otherwise has missed the point entirely (as Jesus himself explains in the Course).

Similarly, "machiara" meant "sword" by the time the KJV team got their hands on the Book of Revelation. In earlier times, however, the word was generally understood to symbolize the Word of God.

Let's move on to the third verse, which the KJV Bible presents thusly:

And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, "Come and see." And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand. And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, "A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine."

Translated with a wee bit more care and insight, the third verse reads:

And when he opened the third seal of the signet ring, I heard the third Living Creature say, "Come and look and behold a black horse, and the Self seated thereupon to have a yoke in hand. And I heard a voice from the midst of the four Living Creatures say, "A quart of wheat for a denarius; three quarts of barley for a denarius; and to do wrong not the least oil and wine."  

Unsure what that last bit means, I did some digging. All I was able to ascertain, unfortunately, was that a quart of wheat amounted to the quantity needed to make enough "daily bread" to feed one person, while a denarius was a small Roman coin equivalent to the average daily wage in the First Century CE. Three quarts of less-costly barley, on the other hand, would feed one person for three days or three people for one day. My gut tells me the reference to oil and wine has to do with the atonement. My gut also tells me that this whole message might be another way of saying, "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's; and render unto God what is God's," but I can't quite connect the dots. 

Let's move on to the fourth verse in the KJV Bible, which reads:

And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, "Come and see." And I looked, and beheld a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

Oh, how the Evil One delights in twisting things to terrify his servants on earth. What the verse actually imparts isn't the least bit frightening. When more sensitively translated, the verse reads more along these lines:

And when he opened the fourth seal of the signet ring, I heard the voice of the fourth Living Creature say to come and to look and be aware and to behold a pale horse, and the Self-Identity to be seated was higher than the self separated from God, and the underworld (Lower World) that followed after. And the authority was given unto the Self upon the fourth earth to end the association with weapons of war and judgment, of hunger and famine, and of death (both spiritual and physical), and (to end) subjugation to the wicked beast (the Ego Mind) of the physical earth.

Shall I continue? -- or have we wandered too far off track? I think I'll keep going, because, as I said, I'm extremely curious about the four horsemen.

In the KJV Bible, the next three verses read:

And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth? And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellow servants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.

The original Greek account, meanwhile, reads closer to this:

And when [the lamb] opened the fifth seal of the signet ring, behold! under an altar, the Souls offering forgiveness ("sphazo," again) on account of the Word or Logos of God, and for the purpose of bearing witness to this state of existence, and to call down a great voice to speak until the despot, set apart from truth, chose not to judge or avenge his blood-fellows residing on the earth. And bright flowing robes were given to each to provide all-authority and command of the Self in order to bestow blessings and give rest yet a little while until their fellow disciples (in service to God) and their fellow servants and their brothers destined to kill achieved complete realization of the Self.

I'll stop there, because we've lost the thread of the horses, which appear to be the "shaktis" or "forces" of the four Living Beings -- the bearers of the chariot-throne of "the Fire of God's Presence" on the Seventh Plane. And this also tracks with what the Angel told and showed Zechariah.

Okay, so ... what have we learned from Revelations about the four horses (not "horsemen," actually)? The first thing we've learned is that the horses, whose riders represent our own Higher Self, come out when the seals are broken. Those seals, I'm fairly certain, represent the chakras, churches, or mansions -- so the horses of the Living Beings come forth when we clear the Ego Mind's "veils of deception" from our chakras. I wish the prophet had specified which Living Being sent forth which horse, but alas, he did not. So, we can only speculate. What I have worked out from what's written is this:

Root Chakra = a horse, seen brightly, of unspecified color (probably the grizzled horse that went south in Zechariah's vision)

Sacral Chakra = fire-colored horse

Solar-Plexus = black horse 

Heart Chakra = pale horse


Let's assume that the pale horse of the fourth "seal" is "the white horse of Soma" described in the Rig Veda Sukta under discussion. This also tracks with what Zechariah saw and was told by the Angel; that is, that the white horse followed the black horse into the north country. My gut tells me that the black horse represents the inner-guru (given that Krishna is known as "the black one"), while the pale horse represents the Voice for God, Om vibration, or Living Water (which we begin to hear after entering the fourth chakra or "lunar mansion"). But that's purely conjecture at this point, so let's carry on and see what more we can learn about the mysterious "Asvina."

Let's return to the Rig Veda. oAccording to Max Muller, the Rv 1.3.8 reads: viśve-devāso apturaḥ sutam ā ganta tūrṇayaḥ usrā iva svasarāṇi. Based on my research and guidance, those words translate more or less thusly:

The universe protecting God's Authority sends down to the Sonship God's Grace, the courier of new purpose, in the manner of dawning light through the Breath or Voice (Vayu) of the Lesser Light (the Vishwapurusha or Soma).

Visve-devaso = The universe protecting God's authority
apturah = sends down 
sutam = to the Sonship
a-ganta = the Grace of God, Epiousion bread, or spiritual sustenance
tur-nayah = the courier of new purpose
usra-va = in the manner of dawning light
svasa-ra-ni = through the breath (Vayu or Ruach) of the lower-radiance, Lesser Light, or Soma
(or) sva-sara-ni = in the lower waters of self-perception 

The real bugger in this line was coming up with a suitable definition for "ganta." The word is similar to "ghanta," which means "temple bell," but that definition doesn't really work here. Figuratively, it sort of works, if we allow that a temple bell (like a church bell) calls the faithful to worship. So, "ghanta" might be a figurative reference to the Call to Return. Seeking a better result, I tried breaking the word as "ga-nta," "gan-ta," and even "g-anta." Still dissatisfied, I prayed for guidance. That's when I got the idea to join "ganta" with the solitary "a" preceding the word. Because that "a" wasn't working, either.

Lo and behold, "a-ganta" turned out to be a word! According to the Wisdom Library, "aganta" is a name for Shiva, the "Christ-the-redeemer" figure in Hinduism. According to Wikipedia, "aganta" derives from "agra," which means (among many other definitions) a specific type of alms given to Brahmins. And, as we now know, "alms" is scriptural "code" for the thought-offerings we give and receive in the Holy Meeting Place, while "Brahmin" (contrary to common belief) is a Vedic term for any truth-seeker advanced enough to hear the Om.

Interestingly, the type of alms to which "agra" refers are called "bhiksa" or "bhiksha" -- a term used in Jainism, Buddhism, and Hinduism to describe the practice undertaken by religious mendicants of "begging," as well as the FOOD given by those being asked for "alms."

A Buddhist monk (I think) receiving food in response to his request for "alms."

If we view all of this symbolically (as we must), it makes perfect sense. In response to prayers to Shiva for "alms" -- the miracle of corrected perception -- devotees receive the spiritual sustenance of "aganta," "bhiska," or "grace" -- the Epiousion bread and/or Living Water through which we attain enlightenment. That "aganta" is a name for Shiva makes sense, too, since we request the "alms" of God's Grace by invoking the name of Shiva or Jesus Christ.



  

Let's turn again to the Lord's Prayer -- the example Jesus gave his disciples of the "correct" way to pray. If you're unfamiliar with this old standard, it begins thusly:

Our Father, who art in Heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy Kingdom, come;Thy Will be done; on earth as it is in Heaven. Give us this day our daily bread and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.

Now, I haven't checked the accuracy of the whole New Testament translation of this prayer, but I do know that an actual loaf or supply of edible "daily bread" is NOT the form of "alms" Jesus advised his disciples to request "in the hallowed name of the Father." As explained in a previous post, the Greek word changed to "daily" by the Anglican translators was Epiousion, which means, more or less, "the sacred substance that hastens wisdom in the manner of dawning light."

Many Biblical scholars insist Epiousion's true meaning was lost to the sands of time, but that's not entirely true. The word's root is defined in the Secret Book of John -- one of the disciple-authored gospels rejected by the Catholic authorities who chose the New Testament canon. Not only was the Secret Book of John rejected by these men, it was condemned as "gnostic" and destroyed. Had it not been unearthed with other "lost" sacred texts in the Nag Hammadi desert in 1947, John's "secret book" would have indeed been lost forever, along with the true definition of the Greek word Epiousion.

In John's Secret Book, the root-word Epinoia is defined as "light-filled conceptualization" -- a term synonymous with True or Miraculous Perception in the Course. Epinoia also is the name given the Holy Spirit in John's little book. Thus, when Jesus advised his disciples to pray to the Heavenly Father for Epiousion bread, he was instructing them to ask for the "alms" of aganta -- "the sacred substance that hastens wisdom in the manner of dawning light."


We've now reached the Sukta's ninth line, which reads (contrary to Max Muller's presumed breaks): viśve-devāso asridha ehimāyāso adruhaḥ medhaṃ juṣanta vahnayaḥ pavaka nah. And, when correctly translated, those words tell us, in beautiful language, both what Soma is and where he dwells.

The universe protecting God's Authority is the resting place of the all-pervading intelligence of Soma, the unseen force with visible results, the power of right-understanding, the wisdom of the infinite, and the vehicle for the purifying fires of Wholeness.

Visve-devaso = the universe protecting God's authority
asri-dha = is the resting place
ehimaya-so = of the all-pervading intelligence of Soma
adruhah = the unseen force with visible results
medham = the power of right-understanding
jusa-nta = the wisdom of the infinite
vahnayah = the vehicle for the
pavaka = purifying fire
nah = of Wholeness

The Sukta's tenth line is actually two sentences reading: Sarasvatī vājebhir vājinīvatī yajñaṃ vaṣṭu dhiyāvasuḥ codayitrī sūnṛtānāṃ. Cetantī sumatīnām yajñaṃ dadhe sarasvatī.

Sarasvati strengthens the energy of the Horses of Destiny extending higher understanding in the dwelling-place of the universal mind inspiring the movement of the sacred dance (of Shiva, the Purusha). To restore the consciousness arising from that Holy Mind, extend the knowledge given by Sarasvati.

sarasvati = Sarasvati
vajebhir = strengthens (vaj) the might or energy of (ebhir)
vaji-nivati = the horses of destiny
ya-jnam = extending higher understanding
vastu = in the dwelling-place of
dhiyavasuh = the universal mind
coda-yitri = inspiring or driving the movement
su-n(a)rtanam = of the holy dance (of Shiva, the Purusha)
cet-anti = to restore the consciousness arising from
su-matinam = the holy mind 
ya-jnam = extend the thoughts
dadhe = given by
Sarasvati = Sarasvati

Okay, wow. Lots to consider in this one. Let's start with Sarasvati, whose name is more likely a compound of "sara" (flow or substance) and "svati" (very beneficent) than of "saras" (pooling water) and "vati" (she who possesses), as commonly presumed. I believe this to be so because Svati is a character in the allegorical Hindu epics. She is, in fact, one of the wives of the Moon (Soma). Svati also is associated with Arcturus, the brightest star in the Bootes constellation of the northern hemisphere, as well as with the nakshatra or lunar mansion associated with Arcturus.



In the next verse, we learn EXACTLY what Sarasvati is and/or represents in the great, grand cosmic scheme. I won't preempt the Big Reveal, but I will say that she is NOT the goddess of wisdom, music, and higher learning, as most Hindus have been led to believe.

Another word we need to talk about is "vajinivati," which is typically interpreted as an epithet for Sarasvati meaning "thunderbolt," "powerful," or "possessed of substance of food." If you care to read Sri Aurobindo's justification for the latter definition, you will find it here, along with his flawed translation of this Sukta. Like most other would-be translators, his Holiness divides the word as "vajini" and "vati," which he then defines as "possessing plentitudes." Much as it pains me to find fault with His Nibs, the word carries far more weight when divided as "vaji" (horse) and "nivati" (destiny or fate). "Vaji" doesn't just mean "horse," however. In the Puranas, the word more specifically describes the horses yoked to the chariot of the moon -- to Soma's chariot, in other words. And this verse is supposed to be about the Asvina, so there we are.


And now we come to Rv 1.3's concluding verse, which is typically translated as a prayer of invocation to Maa Sarasvati. This may indeed be the case, but I'm triple-checking everything to be sure I get this right. In transliterated Sanskrit, the verse reads: Maho arṇaḥ sarasvatī pra cetayati ketunā dhiyo viśvā virājati. Those powerful words translate as follows:

The Great Ocean, Sarasvati advances the protection, preservation, and nourishment of the Great Rays of Nara, the Lamps of God in the universe Viraja governs.

maho arnah = the Great Ocean, Cosmic Ocean, or Ocean of Milk
Sarasvati = Sarasvati
pra = advances
ce-tayati = the protection, preservation, and nourishment of
ketu-na = the Great Rays of Nara
dhiyo = the lamps (of God)
viswa = in the world or universe
viraja-ti = Viraja governs

Let's start with the Great Cosmic Ocean, a concept present in the creation mythology of many ancient civilizations. According to these remarkably similar stories, this Cosmic Ocean or Ocean of Milk (in Hinduism) existed before the earth -- or even the visible universe, the whole of which emerged from these "primordial waters" billions of years ago.

As explained in earlier posts, water symbolizes thought or mind in scriptural texts, because thought and/or mind is all that truly exists. So, the Great Ocean these myths describe is, in actuality, the part of God's Mind housing everything in Creation -- the Perfect and Eternal Thoughts of the True Creator or Causeless Cause -- and NOT the material illusion the Ego Mind projected outward to trick us into believing we were somewhere else, free to do as we please (with real effects).


The images above and below show two common Hindu depictions of the Ocean of Milk. The top one depicts Narayana -- Lord Vishnu, the Vishwapurusha -- afloat in the Great Ocean on a raft made of snakes. Riding with him is Brahma, who made the illusion of material reality Vishnu's raft -- the Golden Egg -- seems to float within. Running alongside are two of the many "demons" or "fearful thoughts" souring the Ocean of Brahman's Milk of Truth, as it were.


The image above illustrates the story of how Amrita -- the elixir of immortality -- came into being. Titled "The Churning of the Ocean of Milk" or 
Samudra Manthana in Sanskrit, the story is a told in the Vishnu Purana. What the allegory describes is pretty interesting -- and well worth discussing -- but I'll save that treat for another time. For now, I'm more concerned with the bomb the rishis drop in the verse under discussion. And that "bomb" is that Maa Sarasvati personifies the Great Ocean itself. And as that Great Ocean of Higher Thought, she preserves, protects, and nourishes the Great Rays or Lamps of God within the world or universe Viraja governs.


Okay, so ... who or what is Viraja? The short answer is: the Vishwapurusha, Mind of the Atonement, Body of Christ, or Holy Spirit whose world, universe, or temple is the Golden Egg in our minds. And it is through that Golden Egg, Body of Christ, or Bridge that we return to the Ocean of Milk (from which the visible universe emerged).


The images above and below illustrate the same idea, which is this: the Golden Egg or Body of Christ -- the Upper World or Firmament -- exists in a dimension of mind separate from and beneath Brahma's Egg of Samsara-Maya. We enter that Golden Egg or "Bridge of the Return" through the Temple, which is sandwiched between Brahma's Egg and the Hiranyagarbha. We enter the Hiranyabarbha through the Golden Circle, Circle of the Atonement, and/or Circle of Om, which we are made aware of after entering the fourth Lunar Mansion and/or Anahata Chakra.


Okay, so ... we now have a better idea of what the Rig Veda's third Sukta actually communicates, which is a far cry from what we've been led to believe for centuries, if not millennia. We've learned a lot from this Sukta, including that the Asvina aren't twin horse-headed healers, as long presumed in Hindu mythology. Rather, they're the "horses" or right-minded thought-forces sent forth into the Temple by the four Living Beings and/or Throne-Bearers seen and described by the prophets Ezekiel, Zechariah, Mohammad, and John the Elder. And from their accounts, we can ascertain that those four Living Beings support the wheel at the heart of the universe, upon which rests the chariot-throne of the Greater Light, Spiritual Sun, or Logos. Underneath the throne-bearing wheel, the four Living Creatures stand upon gyroscopic wheels covered in eyes. And those all-seeing double-wheels, I suspect, represent the "horses," "Asvina," and/or "Vajinivati" mentioned herein and in both testaments of the Holy Bible.



A Judeo-Christian representation of the chariot-throne of Elohim and the four Living Beings supporting that throne, based on descriptions in the Book of Ezekiel. 


According to this Rik, there are SEVEN "horses of destiny" rather than four, as the Biblical accounts SEEM to suggest. Those accounts were, however, translated into English by ego-bound Anglican clerics. So, we shouldn't put too much faith in them. Nor should we naively regard the highly tampered-with Holy Bible as the sacrosanct "Word of God." There is a great deal of truth in the Holy Bible, as Course-Jesus attests. But those truths are interwoven with deception, both deliberate and accidental. So, beware.

But (despite the title assigned by the Oxford set), this Sukta isn't really about the Asvina. More accurately, it explains how all the Atonement Powers work together to bring about our liberation from the dream of separation. We are told, for example, that Sarasvati -- the Great Ocean of Higher Thought -- strengthens the energy of the Horses of Destiny, and that those seven-fold thought-forces, those Asvina, offer the Holy Name in the dwelling-place of the universal mind. They are, in other words, the voices making up the Cosmic Chorus. We are further informed that, from that dwelling place, the universal mind inspires the movement of the cosmic dance of Shiva-Nataraja -- the "dance" of spiritual evolution that brings closer the dissolution of the dream-universe in accordance with God's Will.



 
We are further told (in the ninth verse) that the Supreme Radiance (of Divine Love) extends to impel the Soul-Mind (Soma, the Mind of the Atonement) to extend the two (the Great Rays) driving the seven-fold holy sound of God's Voice (the Om/Aum vibration) nearer to Brahmani (the Great Cosmic Ocean of Higher Thought) and away from body identification.

Interestingly, most of this information is symbolically depicted in the image below of Surya, the supposed Hindu sun-god. In actuality, Surya-dev represents the Greater Light, Spiritual Sun, or Logos occupying the chariot-throne on the Seventh Plane. He is, in short, the Truth of our Being -- the Great I Am. Except that he's been usurped (in our dreaming minds) by the little "I am" we made in partnership with Brahma. The purpose of earthly existence -- the one and only God-approved use of the time we have on this imaginary planet -- is to restore "Surya" to his rightful "throne" in our hearts and minds, with the help of the Atonement Powers mentioned above and depicted below.


Note that Surya's chariot is depicted as a wheel, signifying the wheel at the heart of the universe. That wheel-mobile is driven by Aruna, the first red ray of dawn, whose two reins (the two driving the seven) represent the Blood and Water Rays. According to this verse (assuming my translations are correct), the horses pulling Surya's chariot represent the seven-fold holy sound of God's Voice, moving us nearer to Brahmani -- the Ocean of Holy Thought flowing down from the God Mind in Heaven, via the Christ Mind on the Sixth Plane. And I hope I don't have to point out the incredible similarities between this image and the one shown earlier of Ezekiel's vision.


Those who hear the Living Water can attest that there is more than one "voice" singing to us. I, for one, can identify at least three different sounds. There are various humming tones, as well as a soft whistling sound. One day, while walking in my garden, I asked my inner-guru what it was I was hearing. He answer thusly in his still, small voice: "What you hear is the Cosmic Chorus, singing together in perfect harmony."

Pretty cool, right? 

While searching the phrase "Cosmic Chorus" on the Net, I came across several songs and poems, most of them from the Theology and Church Triumphant sphere -- so I won't share them with you (because I still doubt the validity of those teachings). What I will share (and leave you with today) are two citations from the Course, in which Jesus uses the term "chorus" in the same context.

The first reads as follows in the standard edition:

This tiny spot of sin that stands between you and your brother still is holding back the happy opening of Heaven’s gate. How little is the hindrance that withholds the wealth of Heaven from you. And how great will be the joy in Heaven when you join the mighty chorus to the Love of God! (ACIM, T-26.IV.6:1-3

And the second, in the form of a prayer from Jesus to God, reads thusly:

In joyous welcome is my hand outstretched to every brother who would join with me in reaching past temptation, and who looks with fixed determination toward the light that shines beyond in perfect constancy. Give me my own, for they belong to You. And can You fail in what is but Your Will? I give You thanks for what my brothers are. And as each one elects to join with me, the song of thanks from earth to Heaven grows from tiny scattered threads of melody to one inclusive chorus from a world redeemed from hell, and giving thanks to You.

And now we say “Amen.” For Christ has come to dwell in the abode You set for Him before time was, in calm eternity. The journey closes, ending at the place where it began. No trace of it remains. Not one illusion is accorded faith, and not one spot of darkness still remains to hide the face of Christ from anyone. Thy Will is done, complete and perfectly, and all creation recognizes You, and knows You as the only Source it has. Clear in Your likeness does the light shine forth from everything that lives and moves in You. For we have reached where all of us are one, and we are home, where You would have us be.

  

Thanks for listening. Next time, we'll take on Rv 1.4. Until then, may the Great Rays of God's Perfect Peace and Joy guide your way home.


The white horse of Soma, carrying the Soul back to the Greater Light, through the Red Ray of Peace. 



Thursday, November 7, 2024

Shining New Light on the Rig Veda (Part 1): What are Vayu and Soma?


Now that we've established what the Hindu god "Agni" actually represents, let's proceed to the second Sukta of the Rig Veda -- a presumed "hymn" addressed to a deity called "Vayu." In Hinduism, "Vayu" (pictured above) is presumed to be the "god" or "deva" of wind and air. He is revered, therefore, as an elemental power of nature, more or less, not unlike "Agni," the presumed "god of fire." In actuality, "Agni" represents the Fire of God present in the Temple as the Spirit of Grace. "Agni" is, therefore, a modified form of the first Red Ray of Agape, which the God Mind sent forth or extended "in the beginning" to bring the Christ Mind and/or Son of God into "being." 


The graphic "fact sheet" above tells us, among other things, that "Vayu" was born from the breath of Vishwapurusha, guards the Northwest direction, fathered the "gods" Bhima and Hanuman, and rides an antelope vahana. Other sources report that "Vayu" also is 1) the divine messenger of the gods; 2) closely associated with Indra, the "king of the gods" in the Hindu pantheon; 3) the first to drink "the Soma"; and 4) the son of Lord Vishnu. When misidentified as a storm deity, "Vayu" also is said to be one of the Maruts. But, as my multi-post retranslation of Rv 8.7 demonstrates, the Sanskrit terms historically translated as "Maruts" do not, in fact, refer in any way to elemental storm gods.

Hanuman and Bhima, whose allegorical story is told in the Mahabharata epic.

With all that backstory out of the way, let's now explore what the Rig Veda actually reveals about "Vayu." We'll start our investigation, as always, by reviewing the second Sukta's original text in transliterated Sanskrit. According to 19th-century Oxford "orientalist" Max Muller, the Rik is composed of eight metered lines reading as follows:

vāyav ā yāhi darśateme somā araṃkṛtāḥ | teṣām pāhi śrudhī havam ||
vāyo tava prapṛñcatī dhenā jigāti dāśuṣe | urūcī somapītaye ||
indravāyū ime sutā upa prayobhir ā gatam | indavo vām uśanti hi ||
vāyav indraś ca cetathaḥ sutānāṃ vājinīvasū | tāv ā yātam upa dravat ||
vāyav indraś ca sunvata ā yātam upa niṣkṛtam | makṣv itthā dhiyā narā ||
mitraṃ huve pūtadakṣaṃ varuṇaṃ ca riśādasam | dhiyaṃ ghṛtācīṃ sādhantā ||
ṛtena mitrāvaruṇāv ṛtāvṛdhāv ṛtaspṛśā | kratum bṛhantam āśāthe ||
kavī no mitrāvaruṇā tuvijātā urukṣayā | dakṣaṃ dadhāte apasam ||

Let's now review how this alleged "hymn" or "poem" was translated by H. H. Wilson and Ralph T. H. Griffith, both of whom held the Boden Sanskrit Professorship at Queen's College, Oxford, during the 19th Century. As explained in my previous post, the Boden Professorship was funded by a former East India Company officer to help convert the native peoples of India to Anglican Christianity. The translation of the Rig Veda Samhita by Professors Wilson and Griffith were, therefore, agenda-driven to some extent. Keep that in mind as we go forward.

Let's start with Wilson's translation of the second Rik, which reads thusly:

Vayu, plural asant to behold, approach; these libations are prepared for you drink of them; hear our invocation.

Vayu, your praisers praise you with holy praises having poured out Soma juice, and knowing the (fit) season.

Vayu, your approving speech comes to the giver (of the libation), and to many (others who invite you) to drink of the Soma juice.

Vayu, these libations are poured out (for you); come hither with food (for us); verily the drops (of the Soma, abiding in the sacrificial rite, you are aware of these libations; come both (then) quickly hither.

Vayu and Indra, come to the rite of the sacrificer, for thus, men, will completion be speedily (attained) by the ceremony.

I invoke Mitra, of pure vigour, and Varuna, the devourer of foes; the joint accomplishers of the act bestowing water (on the earth).

Mitra and Varuna, augmenters of water, dispensers of water, you connect this perfect rite with its true (reward).

Sapient Mitra and Varuna, prosper our sacrifice and increase our strength; you are born for the benefit of many, you are the refuge of multitudes.


Here now is Griffith's liberally stylized translation of the same verses:

BEAUTIFUL Vayu, come, for thee these Soma drops have been prepared:
Drink of them, hearken to our call.
Knowing the days, with Soma juice poured forth, the singers glorify
Thee, Vayu, with their hymns of praise.
Vayu, thy penetrating stream goes forth unto the worshipper,
Far-spreading for the Soma draught.
These, Indra-Vayu, have been shed; come for our offered dainties' sake:
The drops are yearning for you both.
Well do ye mark libations, ye Vayu and Indra, rich in spoil,
So come ye swiftly hitherward.
Vayu and Indra, come to what the Soma presser hath prepared:
Soon, Heroes, thus I make my prayer.
Mitra, of holy strength, I call, and foe-destroying Varuna.
Mitra and Varuna, through Law [of Giving and Receiving], lovers and cherishers of Law,
Have ye obtained your mighty power,
Our Sages, Mitra-Varuna, wide dominion, strong by birth,
Vouchsafe us strength that worketh well.

How accurate are these two translations? Not very, because (for starters) both of these professorial missionaries transcribe "vayu," "vaya," "vayo," and "vayav" as the proper name "Vayu," rather than as the descriptive terms they actually are. Did they commit this faux pas out of ignorance, artfulness, or respect for longstanding religious and cultural traditions in India? Considering their imperialist intentions, I'm guessing it wasn't the latter.

Rightly understood, "Vayu" is the Sanskrit equivalent of Ruach -- a Hebrew word often translated as "wind," but which more particularly describes the "breath," "mind," and/or "spirit" acting in the world on God's behalf to end the perceived separation. In the Hebrew Bible, the word Ruach appears 387 times, compared with (curiously) only twelve occurrences of "Vayu" in the Rig Veda.

Before we embark on today's sure-to-be illuminating main event, let's explore the real meaning of the word "Vayu" and its variations. When the Vedas were revealed to the rishis thousands of years ago, "vayu" was only linked with "wind" or "air" in the figurative sense of being an invisible force with visible effects. Having nothing to do with elemental wind or air, the word can be divided three ways. As "v-ayu," it means "divided Living Being" or "continuous consciousness in separate forms"; as "va-yu," it means "uniter of the divided"; and as "vay-u" the word means the sound, tone, or voice of "U" -- a stand-alone letter used fairly often in the Rig Veda to designate the Holy Name.

As with many Sanskrit words, all three variations of "vayu" communicate the same idea in slightly different ideational forms. Vayu is, in fact, the continuous consciousness of "the Christ" separated into bodies, the power that reunites that divided consciousness, and the sound or "wind" emanating from the Holy Name inside the Temple of the Holy Spirit.

When rendered as vay-a, the word translates slightly differently as "Voice for/of God," and when spelled "vayav" it means relating to or coming from that divine inner-voice.

All of this makes pretty clear that "Vayu" personifies the "wind" or "voice" coming from the Christ Self or Mind governing the Sixth or Ajna Plane of restored Christ-Consciousness, whereas "Agni" represents the "fire," "spirit," or "presence" of the God Self or Mind on the Seventh, Sahasrara, or restored-to-the-state-of-pure-grace plane of consciousness. Vayu is, however, only one of the names the Vedas assign to this ubiquitous "voice" or "wind." And that is probably the reason the name "Vayu" appears so infrequently in the Rig Veda compared to its Hebrew counterpart in the Old Testament.

With all that firmly in mind, let's now interpret afresh this ancient wisdom-teaching about "Vayu." But first, let me state for the record that the Rig Veda contains NOT "the sacred hymns of the Brahmans" (as historically presumed), but elevated teachings for anyone and everyone sincerely seeking Higher Truth. These narrative teachings are, in fact, remarkably similar in both substance, vocabulary, and intended audience to those presented by Jesus Christ in A Course in Miracles.

(As an aside, I'm convinced that the word "Sukta" doesn't actually mean "hymn." The word is a compound of "su" (holy or sacred) and "kta" -- a rather mysterious "suffix" I believe to mean "wisdom," "knowledge," or "thought." The linguists may profess that adding "kta" at the end of a word merely shifts it from present to past tense, but I don't buy it. Why not? Because that rule doesn't work in the cases of "sukta," "bhokta," and "nukta" -- three words appearing in the Rig Veda, but rarely translated correctly (owing partly to this erroneous rule).

Okay, so ... according to Sri Aurobindo's posthumous website, the first line of Rv 1.2 should read: vāyo iti ā yāhi darśata ime somāḥ aram-kṛtāḥ teṣām pāhi śrudhi havam. I'm inclined to agree, since that transliteration works much better than does Muller's "metered" contrivance.

With each hallowed word given its proper due, the first line of the second Rik should translate roughly as follows:

The sound of the answer to the call coming from God extends to impel the vision that dissolves object-form, bringing to an end reverence for the idea of doing. All the Sons (of God) are saved by hearing its utterings.

Individually, the word-definitions work out thusly:

vay-o (the sound of the answer) iti (coming from) a (God) ya-hi (extends to impel) darsa-te-me (the vision that dissolves object-form) so-mah (bringing to an end reverence for) aramb-kratah (the idea of doing). Tesam (All the sons of God) pahi (are saved) srudhi (by hearing) havam (its utterings)

Did I forget to mention that "o" means "the answer to a call" in Vedic Sanskrit shorthand? The stand-alone letter "o" can represent other "ideas" as well, such as the Name of the Creator (Brahman, not Brahma) and the Om vibration, which are, in effect, the SAME idea in different forms. Course-Jesus mentions many times "the Answer" to which this opening verse refers. At one point in the Text, he states point-blank: "The Holy Spirit is God’s Answer to the separation; the means by which the Atonement heals until the whole mind returns to creating."

Okay, so ... when translated correctly, this little verse conveys unadulterated Satya -- the Absolute Truth of Spiritual Reality. As Course-Jesus explains, the Holy Spirit is God's Answer to our call to be saved from the error of trusting the Ego Mind. So, the Holy Spirit can't be the one the rishis call "Vayu," as I've long presumed. As Rv 1.2.2 clearly explains, Vayu is the SOUND emanating from the Answer or Holy Spirit. And, as our graphic fact-sheet further explains, that SOUND was born from the breath of the Vishwapurusha, "the universal Living Being."

As I understand the concept, the Vishwapurusha contains and ensouls all the "I Am" particles under the Ego Mind's evil sleeping-spell of "Vishwa" -- a Sanskrit term meaning "external-orientation," more or less. In the Course and the Bible, Jesus calls this "Living Being" the Body of Christ or simply "the Christ." And it is this "Living Being" or Vishwapurusha he compares to a vine throughout the New Testament.

Bible-Jesus makes his meaning especially clear in John 15:1-5, wherein he says: "I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit, he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. I am the vine, ye are the branches. He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me, ye can do nothing."

Stated another way, the Vishwapurusha is the "body" or "host" in which our Souls abide in the dream-universe. The Vishwapurusha also dwells in us, as the True Vine coiled within the "seed" waiting to awaken at the appointed time. But that "host-body" isn't a "body" in the ego's way of thinking. Rather, it's like a "polis" (in Greek) or "pura" (in Sanskrit) -- a walled city or stronghold in which like-minded individuals join together in the shared purpose of restoring the greater whole.

In the Course, Jesus says the following along these same lines:

The Christ in you inhabits not a body. Yet He is in you. And thus it must be that you are not within a body. What is within you cannot be outside. And it is certain that you cannot be apart from what is at the very center of your life. What gives you life cannot be housed in death. No more can you. Christ is within a frame of Holiness whose only purpose is that He may be made manifest to those who know Him not, that He may call to them to come to Him and see Him where they thought their bodies were. Then will their bodies melt away, that they may frame His Holiness in them.

No one who carries Christ in him can fail to recognize Him everywhere. Except in bodies. And as long as he believes he is in a body, where he thinks he is He cannot be. And so he carries Him unknowingly, and does not make Him manifest. And thus he does not recognize Him where He is. The son of man is not the risen Christ. Yet does the Son of God abide exactly where he is, and walks with him within his holiness, as plain to see as is his specialness set forth within his body.

The body needs no healing. But the mind that thinks it is a body is sick indeed! And it is here that Christ sets forth the remedy. His purpose folds the body in His light, and fills it with the Holiness that shines from Him. And nothing that the body says or does but makes Him manifest. To those who know Him not it carries Him in gentleness and love, to heal their minds. Such is the mission that your brother has for you. And such it must be that your mission is for him.

(ACIM, T-25.in.1:1–3:8)

The concept of the Vishwapurusha must be pretty important; otherwise, Jesus wouldn't have tried so hard and so often to explain the idea to his disciples (who still didn't get it). When, for example, at the Last Supper, he broke a loaf of bread into pieces and said, "This is my body; eat it in remembrance of me," he meant: "This loaf represents the whole Living Being, Vishwapurusha, or Christ Self to which you/we all belong. And through the spiritual nourishment I brought into the world, you will one day remember the communion, covenant, or Holy Relationship all of Creation shares in that glorious Wholeness of Being."

And, for the record, the bits of bread Jesus afterward passed around the table probably represented the "epiousion bread" he instructed his followers to request from God in Matthew 6:9-13, wherein he dictates the proper way to pray (via the Lord's Prayer or Our Father). I'm sure I've mentioned this before, but in case I haven't (or you missed it) the Anglicans wrong-mindedly changed the enigmatic Greek word epiousion to "daily" when they translated Matthew's narrative into English. Scholars still scratch their heads over Christ's intended meaning. But the word is, in fact, defined in the Secret Book of John as "that which makes spiritual transcendence desirable, understandable, and attainable."

This tells me, at least, that what Jesus called "epiousion bread" in Matthew's narrative is synonymous with the Living Water he mentions elsewhere in the New Testament gospels. Thus, "epiousion bread" and Living Water are interchangeable terms used by Bible-Jesus to describe the SOUND made by the Spirit of Grace to accomplish God's Will for our return to the Wholeness of Mind required for Perfect Creating.

Am I overexplaining again? Lol. 

Let's return to the Vishwapurusha, because the two images below illustrate the concept quite effectively. What both show is the Vishwapurusha or "Christ Mind of the At-one-ment" enclosed within a golden egg surrounded by a glowing "aura." That "aura" is, I'm reasonably sure, the Golden Circle and/or Circle of the Atonement much-discussed in the Course. That circle is, I further believe, the "gateway" through which we enter the first plane or "kingdom" of the Upper or Real World.

In Christian theology, Jesus Christ symbolizes the Vishwapurusha.

In Hindu theology, Lord Vishnu symbolizes the Vishwapurusha.


What these two images don't show are the "sparks," "seeds," or "soul-fragments" comprising the "corporate body" or Greater Universal Soul represented by the figure at the center of the egg. As particles of that Living Being, our Souls can NOT be tarnished by anything we do in the dream of earthly existence. Hard as that may be to accept, it is nevertheless TRUE. And our complete faith in that unsmirchable holy innocence is what ultimately frees us from the Wheel of Karma.

Our Souls may be as perfect as the Holy Spirit, but they are not eternal as individual beings. As particles of the Vishwapurusha, they are merely "devices" for learning the at-one-ment curriculum. In a very real sense, they are players moving their characters (our serial ego-body incarnations) through a virtual-reality training-simulator. The goal of the training is to make them/us the perfect co-creators the God Mind created the Christ Mind to be. The successful outcome of the training is guaranteed because 1) the dream-universe came and went in the single, miraculous instant Course-Jesus calls "the Holy Instant" and 2) whatever God wills is done to perfection the instant He wills it. Thus, we only seem to be in the world, going through hell, because we haven't yet chosen, of our own free will, to give up the game and go home.

You get that, right? If not, pay careful attention to what Course-Jesus says below:

Hear, then, the one answer of the Holy Spirit to all the questions the ego raises: You are a child of God, a priceless part of His Kingdom, which He created as part of Him. Nothing else exists and only this is real. You have chosen a sleep in which you have had bad dreams, but the sleep is not real and God calls you to awake. There will be nothing left of your dream when you hear Him, because you will awaken. Your dreams contain many of the ego’s symbols and they have confused you. Yet that was only because you were asleep and did not know. When you wake you will see the truth around you and in you, and you will no longer believe in dreams because they will have no reality for you. Yet the Kingdom and all that you have created there will have great reality for you, because they are beautiful and true. (ACIM, T-6.IV.6:1-8)

As explained more clearly in the Course than in the Bible, God created ONE Son, not many. That one Son isn't Jesus, the "son of man" the Romans crucified; that one Son is "the Christ" -- the all-encompassing Divine Being that IS Creation. That one Self in its natural state of spiritual WHOLENESS is the Great Purusha, Spiritual Sun, Greater Light, Shining One, and/or Logos underneath and hidden by the illusion of form. In the dream-simulator (inside the serpent's belly), the Souls belonging to that united Sonship or "Corporate Body of the Christ Self," but perceiving themselves as individuals for at-one-ment purposes, are known collectively in Hinduism as the Vishvedevas. And those Vishvedevas dwell together within the golden egg of the Vishwapurusha.

Or, to quote Course-Jesus again:

It should especially be noted that God has only ONE Son. If all His creations are His Sons, every one must be an integral part of the whole Sonship. The Sonship in its Oneness transcends the sum of its parts. However, this is obscured as long as any of its parts is missing. That is why the conflict cannot ultimately be resolved until all the parts of the Sonship have returned. Only then can the meaning of wholeness in the true sense be understood. Any part of the Sonship can believe in error or incompleteness if he so chooses. However, if he does so, he is believing in the existence of nothingness. The correction of this error is the Atonement. (ACIM, T-2.VII.6:1-9)

The golden egg of which we speak is, btw, the Hiranyagarbha or "golden womb" much discussed in Vedic philosophy. Curiously, Hiranyagarbha isn't mentioned by name until Rv 10.121, which has appropriately come to be known as the Hiranyagarbha Sukta.

Hiranyagarbha, the "golden egg" or "golden womb" of the Vishwapurusha -- the Mind of the Atonement, in Course terms.

Much as I'm tempted, I won't retranslate the whole Sukta at this point in time. I will, however, decipher afresh the eighth verse Griffith translates thusly:

He is the God of gods, and none beside him.

Is this, in fact, what the verse says? Let's see, shall we? In transliterated Sanskrit, the eighth verse reads: yo deveṣv ādhi devā eka āsīt. By my calculations, those words translate more along these lines:

Join all the demigods (the Vishvadevas, our fellow Souls in the golden egg) in the higher divine oneness of God's Holy Instant.

yo = yu (join) devesv = devesu (all the demigods) adhi (in the higher) deva (divine) eka (oneness) a-sit (of God's Holy Instant)

Okay, so ... what does any of this have to do with Soma and/or Sutasoma? The answer is EVERYTHING, because the Vishwapurusha's glowing golden egg represents the Lesser Light of God shining in the darkness of the void of Brahma-manifested nothingness. And in that dark "Vishwa" -- the "Night" in scriptural lingo -- that INWARD Lesser Light is projected OUTWARD as the Moon orbiting Planet Earth. 



What we perceive outwardly as the physical moon is a projection of the "golden egg," "golden womb," or Hiranyagarbha of the Mind of the Atonement. Inwardly, that "moon" or "egg" resembles the image below (sorta-kinda, when we're advanced enough to see it). Some spiritual teachers call this the "spiritual eye" or "third eye," but it's actually the passageway through the three planes of the Upper World.


And that is why, in Hinduism (and the Rig Veda), Soma-Chandra is associated with the Moon, as well as partnered with Agni (the Fire of God or Greater Light occupying the Chariot-Throne of God on the Seventh Plane).



In Hinduism (when right-mindedly understood), Soma-Chandra represents the Vishwapurusha -- the Lesser Light of God and/or Christ Mind of the Atonement. His antelope (or gazelle) vahana, meanwhile, represents the Living Water our yajnas or "right-minded thought-offerings" disperse to all the Souls inhabiting the golden egg with ours. That is why the antelope has a spotted coat in correct depictions of Soma-Chandra. Those spots represent the particles or "sparks" of the Vishwapurusha our Souls actually are.




The two images above show Soma-Chandra, as depicted in Hinduism. Note that, like Lord Vishnu, he holds the instruments of Atonement (the cudgel of Truth, the jug of Living Water, and the lotus representing the Royal Path). His chariot symbolizes the Temple, whose single wheel represents the Dharmachakra. And the twin gazelles or antelopes pulling him through the dark night of time and space are the anointing oils of the Atonement.

But wait, there's more ... because apprehending what Soma genuinely represents explains why this deific force has been wrongly and rather weirdly associated with plants and mind-altering drinks for so many centuries. Being the Vishwapurusha, Soma is both the True Vine and the source of the Living Water -- two metaphors unilluminated translators have taken literally (as per usual).

Makes sense, right?

Let's return to Rv 1.2.1, which contains the first mention of Soma in the Vedic literature. The word is not, however, used at first as a proper noun. Rather, "somah" describes the overarching goal of the Atonement Plan -- our first solid clue that Soma is, in fact, the Mind of the Atonement, Vishwapurusha, and/or Lesser Light of God shining in the "Night" or "Darkness" of ego-manifested material unreality.

The Rik's second line mentions "Sutasoma" -- a word-name both Wilson and Griffith murkily translate as "soma juice." The line that Wilson deciphers -- utterly absurdly -- as "Vayu, your praisers praise you with holy praises having poured out Soma juice, and knowing the (fit) season," actually imparts the following useful wisdom:

The Voice of God sounds the Holy Name that awakens the inner Self veiled by the form. Awaken that shared "sutasoma" to bring nearer transcendental knowledge.

vay-a (The Voice of God) ukth-ebhir (sounds the Holy Name) jarante (that awakens the inner) tvam (Self) accha (veiled by the form). jar-itarah (Awaken that common or shared) suta-soma (Son of Soma? Holy sound of Soma? inspiration of Soma?) ahar-vidah (to bring nearer transcendental knowledge).

As you might imagine, this one took quite a while to work out, mainly because the true definition of "sutasoma" has been buried over the centuries under a pile of ego-generated rubbish. After poking around in the dross for a while, I unearthed seven clues to the real meaning of the word in the Mahabharata epic. In the scriptural allegory, Sutasoma is a prince who sacrifices himself to save a great king. More specifically, Sutasoma agrees to be devoured by a serpent to defeat the demon holding the king hostage.

Let's see if we can solve the mystery of Sutasoma's identity, based on following seven pieces of evidence encapsulated in the Puranic Encyclopedia:

  1. Sutasoma is/was the son of Bhīmasena (meaning "the Body of the Supreme Lord or Spirit") and his wife, Draupadī (a female form of Krishna), who came into being "through a portion of the Vishvedevas" (the learned or advanced Souls performing yajnas in the Holy Meeting Place).

  2. Sutasoma was so named because he was born by the blessings of Chandra (another name for Soma, the Vishwapurusha).

  3. In the legends, Sutasoma combats Vikarna on the first day of the battle of Bharata (the struggle against the Ego Mind in the quest for spiritual truth and/or enlightenment). The son of Dhritarashtra (the blind king whose name means "total darkness") and Gandhari (meaning "keeper of the common purpose"), Vikarna was the wisest and most respectable of the Kauravas (the antagonist forces in the epic). Based on these clues, Vikarna probably represents the Buddhi, the part of the human intellect capable of learning (but not experiencing) Higher Truth.

  4. Sutasoma rescues Srutakarma (the Christ Self) from the clutches of Durmukha (an "ugly-faced" demon) in the battle of Bharata.

  5. Sutasoma fights Viviṃśati (the idea of "body" and "family," including "lineage" and "ancestry," which must be overcome in the quest for Satya).

  6. In an even bigger confrontation, Sutasoma fights Śakuni (an antagonist portrayed as crafty and devious), and is defeated.

  7. Sutasoma also fights Aśvatthāmā (a character representing the egoic ideas of anger, attack, vengeance, and war). At one point in the battle, Aśvatthāmā enters the camp of the Pandavas (the good guys) in "the Night" and kills Sutasoma.

When factored together, these seven clues make evident that Sutasoma is indeed the "holy sound of Soma" -- the Living Water, Song of Heaven, and/or Om/Aum vibration, which our attack thoughts and interpersonal conflicts render mute. So, Soma-juice might be technically correct, but it's hardly an elucidating definition.

"Whoever drinks of the water that I will give him shall never thirst; but the water that I will give him will become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life." -- John 4:14



Let's now check our results. With the correct definition of Sutasoma determined, the Rig Veda verse under discussion should read as follows:

The Voice of God sounds the Holy Name that awakens the inner Self veiled by the form. Awaken that shared holy sound of Soma to bring nearer transcendental knowledge.

The verse now makes perfect sense and also communicates Satya -- because hearing the shared-mind holy sound of Soma does indeed bring nearer transcendental knowledge. That sound is made by the Vishvedevas singing together in the Holy Meeting Place of the Temple. To hear that vibratory sound or song, we must endeavor to bring our True Identity more and more into conscious awareness while pushing the false ego-body persona more and more out of our minds. We have to, in other words, strive to perceive the Soul as the protagonist or "hero" of the dream whose only earthly goal is to leave the waterless desert of earthly existence, once and for all.

Let's proceed to the second Rik's third line, which SHOULD read: vāyo tava prapṛñcatī dhenā jigāti dāśuṣe urūcī (rather than vayo tava pranprncati dhena jigati dasuse uruci somapitaye, as per Max Muller and his Oxford colleagues). In his misguided attempts to preserve the "original poetic meter" or "chanda," Muller broke some of the lines of this Rik in the wrong places. In this case, somapitaye -- the last word in Muller's configuration -- belongs at the beginning of the next line. This is obvious when the teachings are translated and understood more accurately than has generally been the case. With its proper wording restored, Rv 1.2.3 should translate as follows:

The sound of the answer to the call to the atonement advances joining together in the song coming from the state of being pure-hearted.

vay-o (The sound of the answer to the call) tava (to the atonement) pra-prncati (advances joining together) dhena (in the song) jigati (coming from) dasuse (the state of being) uruci (pure-hearted)
Translating this verse proved tricky to a vexing degree, largely because the correct definitions of so many of the Sanskrit words used herein have become lost or distorted over time. "Tava," for example, supposedly means "your" or "yours," but can also allude to 1) heating or cooking, 2) a round griddle used in India, or 3) "tapas" -- one of the key spiritual practices prescribed in Patanjali's Yoga Sutras. And, as explained in my post titled "Yoking the Mind to God's," "tapas" means "penance," the original definition of which was wishing to undo a wrong decision or mistake. That "tava," in this instance, does indeed translate as "to the atonement" or "of the atonement" is attested to in the following citation, wherein Course-Jesus uses almost identical terminology:

The inheritance of the Kingdom is the right of God’s Son, given him in his creation. Do not try to steal it from him, or you will ask for guilt and will experience it. Protect his purity from every thought that would steal it away and keep it from his sight. Bring innocence to light, in answer to the call of the Atonement. Never allow purity to remain hidden, but shine away the heavy veils of guilt within which the Son of God has hidden himself from his own sight. (ACIM, T-14.V.4:1-5)

Course-Jesus also talks at length about the "melody" or "song" referenced in this verse, but especially in Chapter 21 of the Text (standard edition), under the heading The Forgotten Song. This section is an absolute must-read, so I've quoted a goodly chunk below:

Listen,—perhaps you catch a hint of an ancient state not quite forgotten; dim, perhaps, and yet not altogether unfamiliar, like a song whose name is long forgotten, and the circumstances in which you heard completely unremembered. Not the whole song has stayed with you, but just a little wisp of melody, attached not to a person or a place or anything particular. But you remember, from just this little part, how lovely was the song, how wonderful the setting where you heard it, and how you loved those who were there and listened with you.

The notes are nothing. Yet you have kept them with you, not for themselves, but as a soft reminder of what would make you weep if you remembered how dear it was to you. You could remember, yet you are afraid, believing you would lose the world you learned since then. And yet you know that nothing in the world you learned is half so dear as this. Listen, and see if you remember an ancient song you knew so long ago and held more dear than any melody you taught yourself to cherish since.

Beyond the body, beyond the sun and stars, past everything you see and yet somehow familiar, is an arc of golden light that stretches as you look into a great and shining circle. And all the circle fills with light before your eyes. The edges of the circle disappear, and what is in it is no longer contained at all. The light expands and covers everything, extending to infinity forever shining and with no break or limit anywhere. Within it everything is joined in perfect continuity. Nor is it possible to imagine that anything could be outside, for there is nowhere that this light is not.

This is the vision of the Son of God, whom you know well. Here is the sight of him who knows his Father. Here is the memory of what you are; a part of this, with all of it within, and joined to all as surely as all is joined in you. Accept the vision that can show you this, and not the body. You know the ancient song, and know it well. Nothing will ever be as dear to you as is this ancient hymn of love the Son of God sings to his Father still.

And now the blind can see, for that same song they sing in honor of their Creator gives praise to them as well. The blindness that they made will not withstand the memory of this song. And they will look upon the vision of the Son of God, remembering who he is they sing of. What is a miracle but this remembering? And who is there in whom this memory lies not? The light in one awakens it in all. And when you see it in your brother, you are remembering for everyone.


Let's move on to the second Sukta's fourth verse. With "somapitaye" restored to its proper place (and "vayav" moved from the start of the fifth line to its rightful place at the end of this one), the Rik's next line now more correctly reads: Somapitaye indra-vāyū iti ime sutāh upa prayobhir ā gatam indavo vām uśanti hi vayav. By my calculations, those words translate along these lines:

Soma's song extends directly from the revelations (the metaphoric "thunderbolts" of Indra) of Vayu (the Voice of the Holy Name) coming from the Holy Instant of the One Son up above advancing knowledge of Heaven's melody, the elixir of immortality proceeding from the dawning reason given by the Voice for God.

Soma-pitaye or Somapi-taye (Soma's radiance extends directly from) indra-vayu (the revelations or metaphoric "thunderbolts" of Vayu) iti (coming from) ime (the Holy Spirit or Holy Instant) sutah (of the One Son) upa (up above) prayobhir = pra-yobhir (advancing knowledge) a (of Heaven's) gatam (melody) indavo (the elixir of immortality) vam (proceeding from) usanti (the dawning) hi (reason) vayav(a) (given by the Voice for God)

This line's restored first word, somapitaye, is generally translated as "soma-drink" or "soma-plant," which can't be right for myriad reasons. Firstly, the translation of "pitaye" as "drink" or "drinking" simply doesn't work in the context of this verse. Secondly, Soma isn't a drink derived from a plant or any other earthly source. Rather, Soma is the unconscious force or "spirit" of God's Will charged with healing the separation. Thirdly, pitaye can be divided three ways, none of which has anything to do with drinking or plants. As pita-ye, the word translates as "the means by which the Father"; as pit-aye, it means "assembles together"; and as pi-taye, it translates as either "the shining or flawless protector or nurturer" or "the brightness streaming or extending from."

So which is it? Or, is "somapitaye," in actuality, a compound of "Somapi" and "taye"? Somapi is, after all, a character mentioned in the Puranic lore. The son of Sahadeva ("with the gods" or "protected by the gods") and father of Srutasravas ("that which is heard in Wholeness"), Somapi reigned at Girivraja ("the royal mountain") for fifty-eight years.

Not sure why his reign lasted only fifty-eight years in the story, but the other definitions make clear that Somapi personifies a divine force or spiritual entity facilitating our transcendence, rather than any sort of drink of earthly origin. He, in fact, has much in common with Lord Shiva, the "transcendent" aspect of Brahman, who spends much of his time meditating atop Mt. Kailash.




Some of the confusion derives from the fact that "pitaye" appears to be a Sanskrit word. I say "appears to be" because I'm skeptical for a couple of solid reasons. The first is that there's no right-minded definition for "pitaye" anywhere to be found -- and that's usually a sign that it's not really a word. That it's generally and erroneously defined as "drink," "drinking," or "plant" -- to support the ignorant notion that Soma is some sort of hallucinagenic beverage enjoyed by the rishis of yore -- only compounds my suspicions.

While investigating possible meanings of "pitaye," I came across a hymn of praise incorporating the word. The hymn reportedly reads: abhi tvā purva pītaye vasat. This seemed to indicate that "pitaye" might indeed be a word, until further digging revealed the hymn is drawn from Rv 1.19.9, which reads: abhi tva purvapitaye sriami somyam madhu marudbhir agna a gahi. While the hymn's wording divides "purvapitaye" as "purva-pitaye" (presumably in the erroneous footsteps of "soma-pitaye") the word makes more sense as a compound of "purvapi" and "taye."

And, yes; I did indeed translate the whole verse to prove my point (despite it being something of a rabbit-hole, as well as a can of worms). By my calculations, Rv 1.19.9 works out roughly as follows:

The first red ray of dawn, the true state of being in the Walled City protecting the Creator's dream-destroying Wine of Truth, produces the sound arising from the fiery baptism of God's family name.

abhi (first red ray of dawn or sunrise) tvā (the True Self or state of being) pūrvapi-taye (in the Walled City protects) sṛjāmi (the Creator's) so-myam (dream-destroying) madhu (wine of truth) ma-rudbh-ir (producing the sound springing or arising from) agna (the fiery baptism, ablution, or lustration) ā (of God's) gahi (family name).

Finding workable definitions for many of these words was challenging, to say the least. But I did my best. I'm not absolutely certain about "agna," which might mean "holiness," "wellspring," "mouth," or "perceiving," among other possibilities. But some words containing "agna" (like "magna") refer to watery immersion. The word is also sometimes rendered as "ajna" -- the name of the sixth, brow, or third-eye chakra representing the Sixth Plane of Christ-Realization or True Perception. The word "ajna" is typically defined as "command" or "authority." So, other possibilities for "agna" include "true perception," "holy vision," or "directives."

"Madhu," meanwhile, is typically defined as "sweet" or "honey," but the etymology tells us that, once upon a time, "madhu" meant "mead," a honey-wine whose name originally meant "wine of truth."

That brings us to "gahi," which most Sanskrit dictionaries define as "family name." This makes sense, actually, if we apprehend that "gahi" is "the family name" discussed at length (but never disclosed) in Workbook lessons 183: I call upon God's Name and on my own and 184: The Name of God is my inheritance.

These back-to-back lessons are, in fact, vitally important. Hence the links. Course-Jesus doesn't tell us the name -- nor does he call it a "family name" in so many words. He does, however, imply as much in the following from Lesson 183:

God’s Name is holy, but no holier than yours. To call upon His Name is but to call upon your own. A father gives his son his name, and thus identifies the son with him. His brothers share his name, and thus are they united in a bond to which they turn for their identity. Your Father’s Name reminds you who you are, even within a world that does not know; even though you have not remembered it.

God’s Name can not be heard without response, nor said without an echo in the mind that calls you to remember. Say His Name, and you invite the angels to surround the ground on which you stand, and sing to you as they spread out their wings to keep you safe, and shelter you from every worldly thought that would intrude upon your holiness.



The Course and the Rig Veda are, in fact, uncannily simpatico, when both divinely-revealed teachings are right-mindedly read, interpreted, and compared. Something the Rig Veda and the Course both emphasize is that we INCREASE the power of the Atonement by joining together in the Holy Resting Place to give the perception-correcting miracles we have received. And, as I keep saying, that conscious-unconscious giving-and-receiving practice, service, or charity is the yajna presided over by "Agni" -- the Fire of God's presence occupying the chariot-throne on the Seventh Plane. And through the Vishwapurusha and his Vishvedevas -- the miracle-workers performing those yajnas for the benefit of all -- Agni (the One Son higher up) advances knowledge of the Song of Heaven -- the elixir of immortality or "Amrita" that restores the memory of the Truth of our Being.


In the 1930s, Jesus appeared to Sister Faustina, a cloistered Polish nun, with the twin rays of the Atonement streaming from his heart (the Golden Egg of Soma). While praying in the aftermath of her vision, she heard these words in her mind: "The two rays denote Blood and Water. The pale ray stands for the water that makes souls righteous (right-minded or spiritually sane). The red ray stands for the blood which is the life of souls."


Knowing Jesus and Soma both represent the Vishwapurusha helps us apprehend all he revealed to and through Sister Faustina, simply by appearing to her as he did. Symbolically speaking, the heart from which the two rays shone forth represents the Temple, Moon, Lesser Light, Golden Egg, and/or Walled City -- the dream-headquarters of the Vishwapurusha. By appearing as Jesus Christ, he also communicated visually that HE -- the Vishwapurusha -- directs the energy of the two Great Rays.

Or, as Course-Jesus explains:

I am in charge of the process of Atonement, which I undertook to begin. When you offer a miracle to any of my brothers, you do it to yourself and me. The reason you come before me is that I do not need miracles for my own Atonement, but I stand at the end in case you fail temporarily. My part in the Atonement is the cancelling out of all errors that you could not otherwise correct. When you have been restored to the recognition of your original state, you naturally become part of the Atonement yourself. As you share my unwillingness to accept error in yourself and others, you must join the great crusade to correct it; listen to my voice, learn to undo error and act to correct it. The power to work miracles belongs to you. I will provide the opportunities to do them, but you must be ready and willing. Doing them will bring conviction in the ability, because conviction comes through accomplishment. The ability is the potential, the achievement is its expression, and the Atonement, which is the natural profession of the children of God, is the purpose. (ACIM, T-1.III.1:1-10)


This beautiful picture illustrates the true yajna "circle," wherein we call upon the Holy Name we share with God to extend the Living Water to everyone.

Okay, so ... what's the difference between Jesus and the Holy Spirit? The more I study the Course and grow in spiritual understanding, the more I find myself asking this question. Is there, in fact, a difference between Jesus and the Holy Spirit? Before we move on to the Sukta's fifth line, let me share two excerpts from the Course providing the answer:

The Holy Spirit is the Christ Mind which is aware of the knowledge that lies beyond perception. He came into being with the separation as a protection, inspiring the Atonement principle at the same time. Before that there was no need for healing, for no one was comfortless. The Voice of the Holy Spirit is the Call to Atonement, or the restoration of the integrity of the mind. ⁵When the Atonement is complete and the whole Sonship is healed there will be no Call to return. But what God creates is eternal. The Holy Spirit will remain with the Sons of God, to bless their creations and keep them in the light of joy. (ACIM, T-5.I.5:1-7)

I am the manifestation of the Holy Spirit, and when you see me it will be because you have invited Him. For He will send you His witnesses if you will but look upon them. Remember always that you see what you seek, for what you seek you will find. The ego finds what it seeks, and only that. It does not find love, for that is not what it is seeking. Yet seeking and finding are the same, and if you seek for two goals you will find them, but you will recognize neither. You will think they are the same because you want both of them. The mind always strives for integration, and if it is split and wants to keep the split, it will still believe it has one goal by making it seem to be one. (ACIM, T-12.VII.6:1-8)


So, there we have it, straight from the Messiah's mouth. Jesus is a manifestation of the Holy Spirit of the Christ Mind, Mind of the Atonement, and/or Vishwapurusha, which didn't exist before the separation. He is, therefore, an atonement teaching device, rather than "the Only Begotten Son of God, seated at the right hand of the Father in Heaven."

Got it?

Let's move on to the second Rik's fifth line, which now reads: indraś ca cetathaḥ sutānāṃ vājinīvasū tāvā yātanupa dravat vayav. Converted into English, those hallowed words communicate the following:

The Supreme Power of Love works through the awake-consciousness of the sacred Wholeness (or sound of the Holy Name) of the Vajin and Vasu, the Holy Powers of the atonement governing the waters flowing from the Voice for God.

ind-ras = The supreme power of love
ca = works through
cetathah = the awake-consciousness
su-tanam = of the sacred Wholeness (or, perhaps, suta-nam = of sound of the Holy Name)
vajinivasu = of the Vajin (the twin rays) and Vasu (the seven spirits or lamps?), the Holy Powers
tava = of the atonement
yat-anupa = governing the rivers or waters
dravat = streaming or flowing
vayav = from the Voice for God

This teaching is interesting for two reasons. Firstly, it defines Indra(s), the king of the gods in the Hindu pantheon, as the "supreme power of love." This is, in fact, Satya, because Divine Love or Agape is indeed the most powerful force in Creation. Secondly, it tells us that the shakti-force of God's Love works through the awake Christ Mind in Heaven, to wake up its sleeping parts through the Vajin and the Vasu. And these same Great Truths are expressed in the Course.


The Sukta's sixth line reads as follows: indraś ca sunvata ā yātanupa niṣkṛtam makṣv itthā dhiyā narā ||

The Supreme Power of Love works through the holy Lamp of God governing the waters  of the atonement to produce the sound bringing forth the radiance of Nara. 

Ind-ras = the Supreme Power of Love
ca = works through
su-n(i)vata = the holy lamp
a = of God
yatanupa = governing the waters
niskrtam = of the atonement
ma-ksv = to produce the sound (or humming in the ear)
ittha = bringing forth
dhiya = the light or radiance of
nara = Nara, the Red or Blood Ray

This verse actually reveals how the two atonement rays or "Lamps of God" work in partnership to dissolve the ego's delusive and destructive thought-system. In partnership with the Supreme Power of Love, the Water Ray produces the vibratory sound that eradicates the fearful thinking the Ego Mind inspires, thereby increasing the radiant power of Nara, the Blood Ray, underneath the illusion. I speak from experience when I say we feel that power in our heart chakras, while meditating on the Om vibration or Living Water -- as the image below of the light-filled "sacred heart" clearly illustrates.


In the Course, Jesus similarly calls the Great Rays the Lamps of God and/or Lamps of Heaven. In one place, he essentially parrots the Vedic verse under discussion:

No one can escape from illusions unless he looks at them, for not looking is the way they are protected. There is no need to shrink from illusions, for they cannot be dangerous. We are ready to look more closely at the ego’s thought system because together we have the lamp that will dispel it, and since you realize you do not want it, you must be ready. Let us be very calm in doing this, for we are merely looking honestly for truth. The “dynamics” of the ego will be our lesson for a while, for we must look first at this to see beyond it, since you have made it real. We will undo this error quietly together, and then look beyond it to truth. (ACIM, T-11.V.1:1-6)

If I'm not mistaken, this marks the first mention of "Nara" -- the Red Ray -- in the Rig Veda. Nara's partner, who isn't named herein, is indeed "the Holy Lamp of God governing the waters of the atonement." Nara's partner, the Water Ray, is called Narayana or Narayani in the Hindu literature. 

A watercolor painting from the British Museum depicting Nara (Ner) and Narayana (Narayan), who are said to be twin incarnations of Lord Vishnu. Vishnu is also sometimes worshipped as Narayana.

Nara and Narayana performing "tapas" -- the Atonement process described in Rv 1.2.6


The final three lines of the Sukta are generally cast as invocations. But are they? Let's find out. By my calculations, the first of the final three lines translates thusly:

To have peace, invoke the pure-minded Water of Joy working through the sound of eternal Wholeness by which the lamp (of the Water Ray) purifies the perception supporting darkness.

Mit-ram = To have peace
huve = invoke
putadaksam = the pure-minded
var-unam = Water of Joy 
ca = working through
ri-sada-sam =  the sound of eternal wholeness
dhiyam = by which the lamp (the Temple Menorah?)
ghrtacim = purifies the perception
sa-d(v)hanta = supporting darkness

What this verse describes is the second lesson of the Holy Spirit: "To have peace, teach peace to learn it." How do we teach peace? One way is by meditating on the Living Water with the right-minded intention of sharing it with everyone.

Or, to quote Course-Jesus:

Since you cannot NOT teach, your salvation lies in teaching the exact opposite of everything the ego believes. This is how you will learn the truth that will set you free, and will keep you free as others learn it of you. The only way to have peace is to teach peace. By teaching peace you must learn it yourself, because you cannot teach what you still dissociate. Only thus can you win back the knowledge that you threw away. An idea that you share you must have. It awakens in your mind through the conviction of teaching it. Everything you teach you are learning. Teach only love, and learn that love is yours and you are love. (ACIM, T-6.III.4:1-9)

While the words mitram and varunam are typically translated as god-names, I don't believe that's the correct interpretation in this case -- mainly because both words end in "m." And that "m" suggests (in my limited experience) either formal singularity (the Mitra) or possessiveness (Mitra's). The verse should also refer back in some way -- and also build on -- the previous teaching. And to suddenly invoke or introduce two gods not previously mentioned makes no sense whatsoever, either structurally or logically.

As used herein, Mitram is almost certainly a compound of "mit" (to have) and "ram" (peace). Although most Sanskrit dictionaries define Mitra as "friend" and Varuna as "water-god" or "Lord of the Waters," those definitions seem to stem from preconceived notions about these two deific forces. I say this because the syllables in the two names don't support those definitions. And Sanskrit is all about linking syllables to form words.

Besides which, as I said, this verse uses "mitram" and "varunum," which most translators gerrymander as "O Mitra" and "O Varuna" -- a total cop-out, in my humble opinion. "Mitram" also is said to mean "covenant," "oath," or "alliance," which makes more sense, but still misses the mark. Varunum, meanwhile, works best in context when divided as "var" and "unam," which means "Water of Joy."

Although Course-Jesus never uses the specific phrase "Water of Joy," he does express parallel ideas in the following excerpt from the Text:

This world of light, this circle of brightness is the real world, where guilt meets with forgiveness. Here the world outside is seen anew, without the shadow of guilt upon it. Here are you forgiven, for here you have forgiven everyone. Here is the new perception, where everything is bright and shining with innocence, washed in the waters of forgiveness, and cleansed of every evil thought you laid upon it. Here there is no attack upon the Son of God, and you are welcome. Here is your innocence, waiting to clothe you and protect you, and make you ready for the final step in the journey inward. Here are the dark and heavy garments of guilt laid by, and gently replaced by purity and love. (ACIM, T-18.IX.9:1-7


Marching onward, the Rik's second-to-last line reads: ṛtena mitrāvaruṇāv ṛtāvṛdhāv ṛtaspṛśā kratum bṛhantam āśāthe, which I've painstakingly worked out very differently than is the norm.

Equal in power, Mitra and Varuna are two parts of the holy mind defending the pervading truth given and received in the offering expanding the egg-shaped universe of God's Holy Creation.

rt-ena = equal in power
mi-trava-runav = Mitra and Varuna are two parts of
rtavrdh-av = the holy mind defending
rtasp-rasa = the pervading truth given and received
kratum = in the offering
brh-antam = expanding the egg-shaped universe (or Completion/Wholeness)
a-sathe = of God's Holy Creation

I really struggled with this one, largely because the words "rtavrdhav" and "rtasprasa" are generally believed to refer to "rta" -- a shorthand Vedic designation for Divine Law and Order, basically. To find the true definition of these words, I had to break that old mold. The verse now makes perfect sense, as well as speaks Satya. We can also now ascertain the following pertaining to the nature of the powers the Vedas call Mitra and Varuna. Mitra, the Blood Ray, is the "shakti" by which the Vishwepurusha bestows Peace, while Varuna, the Water Ray, is the "shakti" of Joy.

Ergo, Bible-Jesus (speaking as the manifest Vishwapurusha) is invoking the power of Mitra when he says to his disciples, in John 14:27:

Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled, and do not be afraid.

And the final line reads kavī iti nah mitrāvaruṇā tuvijātā urukṣayā dakṣaṃ dadhāte apasam, which translates thusly:

Enlightenment (or Spiritual Sight) arises from the bringing together of Mitra (Peace), Varuna (Joy), and Indra (Love) in the Holy Meeting Place to bestow the Holy Instant given and received in brotherhood.

kavi = Enlightenment (or Holy Vision)
iti = arises from
nah =  the coming together or bringing together
mitra-varuna = Mitra and Varuna (the Great Rays of Peace and Joy)  
tuvi-jatau =  to give their light and strength
or, tuvijat-au = "tuvijat" means Lord Indra, the Supreme Power of Love and "au" designates the sacred-syllable, Om/Aum, so ... the sacred sound of the Supreme Power of Love 
uruksaya = in the Holy Meeting or Resting Place
da-ksam = to bestow the miracle, Holy Instant, or gift of forgiveness
dadhate = given and received
apasam = in fellowship, brotherhood, or one to another

Here, very importantly, the rishis identify the TRUE Holy Trinity as Peace (Mitra), Joy (Varuna), and Love (Indra). They also tell us enlightenment occurs when we bring these three together in the Holy Meeting Place. That is, in point of fact, why it's called "the Holy Meeting Place." In the Course, Jesus says a great deal along these same lines, some of which I've shared below:

Guilt feelings are the preservers of time. They induce fears of retaliation or abandonment, and thus ensure that the future will be like the past. This is the ego’s continuity. It gives the ego a false sense of security by believing that you cannot escape from it. But you can and must. God offers you the continuity of eternity in exchange. When you choose to make this exchange, you will simultaneously exchange guilt for joy, viciousness for love, and pain for peace. My role is only to unchain your will and set it free. Your ego cannot accept this freedom, and will oppose it at every possible moment and in every possible way. And as its maker, you recognize what it can do because you gave it the power to do it. (ACIM, T-5.VI.2:1-10)

Herein lies salvation, and nowhere else. Without attack thoughts I could not see a world of attack. As forgiveness allows love to return to my awareness, I will see a world of peace and safety and joy. And it is this I choose to see, in place of what I look on now. (ACIM, W-55.3:2-5

We state again the truth about your Self, the holy Son of God Who rests in you, whose mind has been restored to sanity. You are the spirit lovingly endowed with all your Father’s Love and peace and joy. You are the spirit which completes Himself, and shares His function as Creator. He is with you always, as you are with Him. (ACIM, W-97.2:1-4)

To know reality is not to see the ego and its thoughts, its works, its acts, its laws and its beliefs, its dreams, its hopes, its plans for its salvation, and the cost belief in it entails. In suffering, the price for faith in it is so immense that crucifixion of the Son of God is offered daily at its darkened shrine, and blood must flow before the altar where its sickly followers prepare to die.

Yet will one lily of forgiveness change the darkness into light; the altar to illusions to the shrine of Life Itself. And peace will be restored forever to the holy minds which God created as His Son, His dwelling place, His joy, His love, completely His, completely one with Him.

(ACIM, W-pII.12.4:1–5:2


What I'm seeing in my mind is an equation: Mitra + Varuna = Indra. What I'm getting with that image is the idea that, to awaken in the Holy Instant, we need to merge or marry the twin rays in the ever-present echo of Perfect Love. I've also been told this very recently in meditation. This marriage of the radiant energy in our hearts with the Water of Joy sounding in our head is, I suspect, "the sacred marriage" (of the spiritual Bridegroom and Bride) depicted in all the SYMBOLIC images below:








And on that auspicious note, I will conclude today's discussion. If you have any questions, leave them in the comments -- or shoot me an email at purushaprasada@gmail.com.

May peace, joy, and love be with you until we meet again.